Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 394, Issue 4, pp 1193–1203 | Cite as

Simultaneous on-line size and chemical analysis of gas phase and particulate phase of cigarette mainstream smoke

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper describes the combined set-up of on-line chemical analysis of gas phase by single-photon ionisation/resonance enhanced multiphoton ionisation–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SPI/REMPI-TOFMS) and on-line particle size analysis by differential electrical mobility particle spectrometry (DMS 500) for the investigation of fresh cigarette mainstream smoke. SPI is well suited for the investigation of a great variety of organic species, whereas REMPI is highly sensitive for aromatic compounds. Gas phase measurements of filtered and unfiltered smoke are possible with the SPI/REMPI-TOFMS in order to determine the influence of the presence of particles on the chemical composition of the gas phase. Initial results are shown for the characterisation and comparison of three pure Virginia tobacco research cigarettes having filter ventilations of 0%, i.e. no filter ventilation, 35% and 70% ventilation. The three cigarette types are smoked under two different smoking regimes, a standard regime using puff parameters equivalent to the conventional International Standard Organisation regime and a more intense smoking regime. For the gas phase, qualitative puff-by-puff resolved yields of three selected compounds (acetaldehyde, phenol and styrene) are shown and compared. For particulate matter, particle number, count median diameter and total surface area are illustrated on a puff-by-puff basis. Yields of the chemicals analysed, puff number and surface area are in good agreement with the intensity of the smoking regime and the dilution of smoke by filter ventilation. However, gaseous compounds are influenced differently, depending whether an absolute particle filter is present or not, i.e. they can be totally removed (phenol), partially removed (styrene) or not affected (acetaldehyde). For particle analysis, the count median diameter decreases from puff to puff and is strongly dependent on the smoking regime and ventilation rate. Thereby, 0% ventilated cigarettes smoked under the intense regime result in the smallest count median diameters of ca. 180 nm, whereas 70% ventilated cigarettes smoked with a standard regime lead to the largest values of up to 280 nm. As particle diameter increases, particle number decreases as a consequence of increasing time for particle coagulation.

Keywords

Photoionisation Electrical mobility particle spectrometry Cigarette smoke Tobacco smoke Gas phase Particulate phase Particle diameter 

References

  1. 1.
    Baker RR (1999) Smoke chemistry in tobacco: production, chemistry, and technology. Davis LD, Nielsen MT (eds.) Blackwell Science, Oxford, U. K.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaworski CL, Dozier MM, Eldridge SR, Morrissey R, Rajendran N, Gerhart JM (1998) Inhal Toxicol 10:857–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman V (1977) Rec. Adv Tob Sci 3:28–58Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holtzclaw J, Rose S, Wyatt J, Rounbehler D, Fine D (1984) Anal Chem 56:2952–2956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baren RE, Parrish ME, Shafer KH, Harward CN, Shi Q, Nelson DD, MacManus JB, Zahniser MS (2004) Spectrochim Acta A 60:3437–3447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vilcins G (1975) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 8(4):181–185Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ceschini P, Lafaye A (1976) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 8(6):378–381Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parrish ME, Lyons-Hart JL, Shafer KH (2001) Vib Spectrosc 27:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li S, Banyasz JL, Parrish ME, Lyons-Hart J, Shafer KH (2002) J Anal Appl Pyrol 65:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parrish ME, Harward CN, Vilcins G (1986) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 13(4):169–181Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parrish ME, Harward CN (2000) Appl Spectrosc 54(11):1665–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shi Q, Nelson DD, McManus JB, Zahniser MS, Parrish ME, Baren RE, Shafer KH, Harward CN (2003) Anal Chem 75:5180–5190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plunkett S, Parrish ME, Shafer KH, Nelson D, Shorter J, Zahniser M (2001) Vib Spectrosc 27:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plunkett S, Parrish ME, Shafer KH, Shorter JH, Nelson DD, Zahniser MS (2002) Spectrochim Acta A 58:2505–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomas CE, Koller KB (2001) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 19(7):345–351Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li S, Olegario RM, Banyasz JL, Shafer KH (2003) J Anal Appl Pyrol 66:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wagner KA, Higby R, Stutt K (2005) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 21(5):273–279Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitschke S, Adam T, Streibel T, Baker RR, Zimmermann R (2005) Anal Chem 77(8):2288–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmermann R, Heger HJ, Kettrup A, Boesl U (1997) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 11:1095–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boesl U (2000) J Mass Spectrom 35:289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gittins CM, Castaldi MJ, Senkan SM, Rohlfing EA (1997) Anal Chem 69(3):286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oudejans L, Touati A, Gullett BK (2004) Anal Chem 76:2517–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McEnally CS, Pfefferle LD, Mohammed RK, Smooke MD, Colket MB (1999) Anal Chem 71:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shi YJ, Hu XK, Mao DM, Dimov SS, Lipson RH (1998) Anal Chem 70:4534–4539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mühlberger F, Zimmermann R, Kettrup A (2001) Anal Chem 73(15):3590–3604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Adam T, Mitschke S, Streibel T, Baker RR, Zimmermann R (2006) Chem Res Toxicol 19:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Adam T, Mitschke S, Streibel T, Baker RR, Zimmermann R (2006) Anal Chim Acta 572:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adam T, Baker RR, Zimmermann R (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    British Standards Institution (2000) BS 5202-14:2000 ISO 4387:2000Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Health Canada Tobacco Control Program (1999) Test Method T-115:1-5Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Symonds JPR, Reavell KSJ, Olfert JS, Campbell BW, Swift SJ (2007) J Aerosol Sci 38:52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reavell K (2002) Proc Aeros Soc 121 - 124Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reavell K, Hands T, Collings N (2002) SAE Tech. Pap. 2002-01-2714Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Norman A (1999) 11 B. Cigarette design and materials in Tobacco. Production, Chemistry and Technology Davis LD, Nielsen MT (eds.) Blackwell Science, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mühlberger F, Hafner K, Kaesdorf S, Ferge T, Zimmermann R (2004) Anal Chem 76(22):6753–6764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Streibel T, Hafner K, Mühlberger F, Adam T, Zimmermann R (2006) Appl Spectros 60:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hafner KM (2004) PhD thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mitschke S (2007) PhD thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mirme A, Noppel M, Piel I, Salm J, Tamm E, Tammet H (1984) Conference Proceeding: 11th international conference on atmospheric aerosols: 155-159Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baker RR (2002) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 20(1):23–41Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wartman WB Jr, Cogbill EC, Harlow ES (1959) Anal Chem 31:1705–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dube MF, Green CR (1982) Rec Adv Tob Sci 8:42–102Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baker RR (1977) Combust Flame 30:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baker RR, Robinson DP (1990) Rec Adv Tob Sci 16:3–101Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kalaitzoglou M, Samara C (2005) Beitr Tabakforsch Int 21(6):331–344Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kalaitzoglou M, Samara C (2006) Food Chem 44:1432–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Baker RR, Dixon M (2006) Inhal Toxicol 18:255–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bernstein DM (2004) Inhal Toxicol 16:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anjilvel S, Asgharian B (1995) Fund Appl Toxicol 28:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pankow JF, 11 (2001) Chem Res Toxicol 14:1465–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Analytical Chemistry, Institute of PhysicsUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Ecological ChemistryHelmholtz Zentrum MünchenNeuherbergGermany
  3. 3.Group R&D CentreBritish American TobaccoSouthamptonUK
  4. 4.bifa-Umweltinstitut-Bavarian Institute of Applied Environmental Research and Technology GmbHAugsburgGermany
  5. 5.Analytical Chemistry, Institute of ChemistryUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations