Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 392, Issue 3, pp 523–531 | Cite as

Method development and validation for melamine and its derivatives in rice concentrates by liquid chromatography. Application to animal feed samples

  • Roberto Muñiz-Valencia
  • Silvia G. Ceballos-Magaña
  • Daniel Rosales-Martinez
  • Raquel Gonzalo-Lumbreras
  • Ana Santos-Montes
  • Angel Cubedo-Fernandez-Trapiella
  • Roberto C. Izquierdo-Hornillos
Original Paper

Abstract

An isocratic LC method for the determination of melamine and its degradation products (ammelide, ammeline, and cyanuric acid), used to increase the apparent protein content of rice protein concentrate, has been developed. Method development involved optimization of different RP columns, aqueous mobile phases, pH, phosphate concentration, and temperature. The optimum separation of these compounds was achieved using a Luna CN column (30 °C), 5 mmol L−1 sodium phosphate (pH 5.0) as mobile phase, 1 mL min−1 flow-rate, UV absorbance-DAD detection at 220 nm, and resorcine as internal standard; this enabled separation of these compounds with baseline resolution (values in the 2.1–10.1 range) in about 8 min. Prior to HPLC, the developed sample preparation procedure consisted in a leaching process using the above mentioned mobile phase. Method validation was carried out in rice protein concentrates in accordance with the European Commission decision 2002/657/EC criteria. For this purpose, eight mandatory performance characteristics for the conventional validation approach were determined: calibration graphs, extraction efficiencies, decision limits, detection capabilities, precision (repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility), accuracy, selectivity, and robustness. The extraction efficiencies for these compounds were in the range 99–100% and the within-laboratory reproducibility at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 detection capabilities concentration levels were smaller than 5, 4, and 3%, respectively. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the analysis of other rice protein concentrates and several animal feed samples.

Keywords

Rice protein concentrate Animal feed Melamine Cyanuric acid Ammelide Ammeline Liquid chromatography 

References

  1. 1.
    European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). www.efsa.europa.eu. Question N° EFSA-Q-2007–093
  2. 2.
    Pichon V, Chen L, Guenu S, Hennion MC (1995) J Chromatogr A 711:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ehling S, Tefera S, Ho IP (2007) Food Addit Contam 24:1319–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FDA (2007) Interim melamine and analogues safety/risk assessment, May 25Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Toxicology Program. TR-245 Carcinogenesis bioassay of melamine (CAS No. 108–78–1) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 mice (feed study). http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/12025
  6. 6.
    Van der Lee MK, van der Weg G, Tragg WA, Mol HGJ (2008) J Chromatogr A 1186:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marwah A, Marwah P, Lardy H (2005) J Chromatogr B 824:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ono S, Funato T, Inoue Y, Munechika T, Yoshimura T, Morita H, Rengakuji S, Shimasaki C (1998) J Chromatogr A 815:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sugita T, Ishiwata H, Yoshihira K, Maekawa A (1990) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 44:567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sancho JV, Ibañez M, Grimalt S, Pozo OJ, Hernandez F (2005) Anal Chim Acta 530:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    FDA. GC-MS screen for the presence of melamine, ammeline, ammelide and cyanuric acid. Version 2.1. www.fda.gov/cvm/GCMSMelamine.htm
  12. 12.
    Downes CJ, Mitchell JW, Viotto ES, Eggers NJ (1984) Water Res 18:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    www.nutral.com. May 2008
  14. 14.
    Commission of EC. Council directive 2002/657/EC. Off J Eur Communities L 221 (2002) 8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1993; EA-4/16. Guidelines on the expression of uncertainty in quantitative testing, Rev. 00. December 2003; NIST. Technical Note 1297. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results, September 1994Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Logan BK (1994) Anal Chim Acta 288:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim B, Perkins LB, Bushway RJ, Nesbit S, Fan T, Sheridan R, Greene V (2008) JAOAC 91:408–413Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Muñiz-Valencia
    • 1
  • Silvia G. Ceballos-Magaña
    • 1
  • Daniel Rosales-Martinez
    • 1
  • Raquel Gonzalo-Lumbreras
    • 1
  • Ana Santos-Montes
    • 2
  • Angel Cubedo-Fernandez-Trapiella
    • 3
  • Roberto C. Izquierdo-Hornillos
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Ciencias QuímicasUniversidad ComplutenseMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica. E.T.S.I.Universidad Pontificia ComillasMadridSpain
  3. 3.Nutral, S.A. Chemical-microbiologic LaboratoryColmenar ViejoSpain

Personalised recommendations