Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 389, Issue 6, pp 1869–1878 | Cite as

Rapid determination of pK a values of 20 amino acids by CZE with UV and capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detections

  • Yveline Henchoz
  • Julie Schappler
  • Laurent Geiser
  • Josiane Prat
  • Pierre-Alain Carrupt
  • Jean-Luc Veuthey
Original Paper

Abstract

A rapid and universal capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) method was developed to determine the dissociation constants (pK a) of the 20 standard proteogenic amino acids. Since some amino acids are poorly detected by UV, capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection (C4D) was used as an additional detection mode. The C4D coupling proved to be very successful on a conventional CE-UV instrument, neither inducing supplementary analyses nor instrument modification. In order to reduce the analysis time for pK a determination, two strategies were applied: (i) a short-end injection to reduce the effective length, and (ii) a dynamic coating procedure to generate a large electroosmotic flow (EOF), even at pH values as low as 1.5. As a result, the analysis time per amino acid was less than 2 h, using 22 optimized buffers covering a pH range from 1.5 to 12.0 at a constant ionic strength of 50 mM. pK a values were calculated using an appropriate mathematical model describing the relationship between effective mobility and pH. The obtained pK a values were in accordance with the literature.

Figure

a UV (1) and C4D (2) detectors placed on-line on the CE capillary. b Curve of effective mobility as a function of pH for histidine

Keywords

Amino acids Capillary zone electrophoresis Capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection Dissociation constants Dynamic coating 

Abbreviations

ADME

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion

BGE

Background electrolyte

C4D

Capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection

CE

Capillary electrophoresis

CZE

Capillary zone electrophoresis

EOF

Electroosmotic flow

FS

Fused silica

ID

Internal diameter

NCE

New chemical entity

References

  1. 1.
    Poole SK, Patel S, Dehring K, Workman H, Poole CF (2004) J Chromatogr 1037:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uhrova M, Miksik I, Deyl Z, Bellini S (1997) Proc Control Qual 10:151–167Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerns EH (2001) J Pharm Sci 90:1838–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jia Z (2005) Curr Pharm Anal 1:41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wan H, Thompson RA (2005) Drug Discov Today 2:171–178Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wan H, Ulander J (2006) Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuban P, Hauser PC (2004) Electroanalysis 16:2009–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guijt RM, Evenhuis CJ, Macka M, Haddad PR (2004) Electrophoresis 25:4032–4057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zemann AJ (2003) Electrophoresis 24:2125–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solinova V, Kasicka V (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1743–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macka M, Hutchinson J, Zemann A, Shusheng Z, Haddad PR (2003) Electrophoresis 24:2144–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kasicka V (2003) Electrophoresis 24:4013–4046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang L, Yuan Z (1999) Electrophoresis 20:2877–2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vcelakova K, Zuskova I, Kenndler E, Gas B (2004) Electrophoresis 25:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuskova I, Novotna A, Vcelakova K, Gas B (2006) J Chromatogr B 841:129–134Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barron D, Jimenez-Lozano E, Irles A, Barbosa J (2000) J Chromatogr 871:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barron D, Jimenez-Lozano E, Barbosa J (2000) J Chromatogr 871:395–406Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishihama Y, Nakamura M, Miwa T, Kajima T, Asakawa N (2002) J Pharm Sci 91:933–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller JM, Blackburn AC, Shi Y, Melzak AJ, Ando HY (2002) Electrophoresis 23:2833–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wan H, Holmen A, Nagard M, Lindberg W (2002) J Chromatogr 979:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Szakacs Z (2006) Electrophoresis 27:3399–3409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou C, Jin Y, Kenseth JR, Stella M, Wehmeyer KR, Heineman WR (2005) J Pharm Sci 94:576–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Geiser L, Henchoz Y, Galland A, Carrupt PA, Veuthey JL (2005) J Sep Sci 28:2374–2380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davies CW (1938) J Chem Soc 2093–2098Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nancollas GH, Tomson MB (1982) Pure Appl Chem 54:2675–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Onsager LL (1926) Physik Z 27:388–392Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Onsager LL (1927) Physik Z 28:277–298Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li D, Fu S, Lucy CA (1999) Anal Chem 71:687–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu X, Kok WTh, Poppe H (1996) J Chormatogr 742:211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Beckers JL, Bocek P (2003) Electrophoresis 24:518–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Avdeef A (2003) Absorption and drug development. Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dawson RMC, Elliott DC, Elliott WH, Jones KM (1986) Data for biochemical research. Oxford Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Passing H, Bablok W (1983) J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:709–720Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Passing H, Bablok W (1988) J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 26:783–790Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wan H, Holmen AG, Wang Y, Lindberg W, Englund M, Nagard MB, Thompson RA (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:2639–2648CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yveline Henchoz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julie Schappler
    • 1
  • Laurent Geiser
    • 1
  • Josiane Prat
    • 1
  • Pierre-Alain Carrupt
    • 2
  • Jean-Luc Veuthey
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Chimie Analytique Pharmaceutique, Section des sciences pharmaceutiquesUniversité de Genève, Université de LausanneGeneva 4Switzerland
  2. 2.Unité de Pharmacochimie, Section des sciences pharmaceutiquesUniversité de Genève, Université de LausanneGeneva 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations