Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 387, Issue 6, pp 2101–2110

Development of an electronic tongue based on a PEDOT-modified voltammetric sensor

  • V. Martina
  • K. Ionescu
  • L. Pigani
  • F. Terzi
  • A. Ulrici
  • C. Zanardi
  • R. Seeber
Original Paper

Abstract

Three different electrodes were tested for use as nonspecific amperometric sensors for blind analysis on real matrices, namely different fruit juices from different fruits or different brands. The first two electrodes were traditional Pt and Au electrodes, while the third one was modified with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) conducting polymer. The sensors were tested separately, tested coupled to each other, and also tested together. The responses of the electrode system(s) were first screened via PCA and then their discriminant capabilities were quantified in terms of the sensitivities and specificities of their corresponding PLS-DA multivariate classification models. Particular attention was paid to analyzing the evolution of the response over subsequent potential sweeps. The modified electrode demonstrated the most discriminating ability, and it was the only system capable of satisfactorily performing the most complex task attempted during the analysis: discriminating between juices from the same fruit but from different brands. Moreover, the electrode “cleaning” procedure required between two subsequent potential sweeps was much simpler for the modified electrode than for the others. This electrode system was therefore shown to be a good candidate for use as an informative element in an electronic tongue applied to the analysis of other food matrices.

Keywords

Amperometric sensor Electronic tongue Conducting polymer Classification Fruit juices 

References

  1. 1.
    Vlasov YU, Legin A, Rudnitskaya A, Di Natale C, D’Amico A (2005) Pure Appl Chem 77:1965–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toko K (1998) Sens Update 3:131–158Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Legin A, Rudnitskaya A, Vlasov Y (2002) Sensor Update 10:143–184Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vlasov Y, Legin A, Rudnitskaya A (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 373:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deisingh AK, Stone DC, Thompson M (2004) Int J Food Sci Technol 39:587–604Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toko K (1996) Mater Sci Eng C4:69–82Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toko K (2000) Sensor Actuat B 64:205–215Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toko K (1998) Biosens Bioelectron 13:701–709Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krantz-Rulcker C, Stenberg M, Winquist F, Lundstrom I (2001) Anal Chim Acta 426:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winquist F, Krantz-Rulcker C, Lundstrom I (2004) MRS Bull 726–731Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soon Y-S, Goodey A, Anslyn EV, McDevitt JT, Shear JB, Neikirk D (2005) Biosens Bioelectron 21:303–312Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Legin A, Rudnitskaya A, Vlasov Yu, Di Natale C, Mazzone E, D’Amico A (2000) Sensor Actuat B 65:232–234Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cortina M, Gutes A, Alegret S, Del Valle M (2005) Talanta 66:1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ciosek P, Brzozka Z, Wroblewski W (2004) Sensor Actuat B 103:76–83Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutes A, Cespedes F, Alegret S, Del Valle M (2005) Talanta 66:1187–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parra V, Arrieta AA, Fernandez-Escudero JA, Garcia H, Apetrei C, Rodriguez-Mendez ML, de Saja JA (2006) Sensor Actuat B 115:54–61Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winquist F, Wide P, Lundstrom I (1997) Anal Chim Acta 357:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penza M, Cassano G, Tortorella F, Zaccaria G (2001) Sensor Actuat B 73:76–87Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Riul A Jr, De Sousa HC, Malmegrim RR, Dos Santos DS Jr, Carvalho ACPLF, Fonseca FJ, Oliveira ON Jr, Mattoso LHC (2004) Sensor Actuat B 98:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winquist F, Holmin S, Krantz-Rulcker C, Wide P, Lundstrom I (2000) Anal Chim Acta 406:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ivarsson P, Holmin S, Hojer N-E, Krantz-Rulcker C, Winquist F (2001) Sensor Actuat B 76:449–454Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ivarsson P, Kikkawa Y, Winquist F, Krantz-Rulcker C, Hojer N-E, Hayashi K, Toko K, Lundstrom I (2001) Anal Chim Acta 449:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Winquist F, Bjorklund R, Krantz-Rulcker C, Lundstrom I, Ostergren K, Skoglund T (2005) Sensor Actuat B 111–112:299–304Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riul A Jr, Gallardo Soto AM, Mello SV, Bone S, Taylor DM, Mattoso LHC (2003) Synth Met 132:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Riul A Jr, Malmegrim RR, Fonseca FJ, Mattoso LHC (2003) Biosens Bioelectron 18:1365–1369Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Apetrei C, Rodrigues-Mendez ML, Parra V, Gutierrez F, de Saja JA (2004) Sensor Actuat B 103:145–152Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arrieta AA, Apetrei C, Rodrigues-Mendez ML, de Saja JA (2004) Electrochim Acta 49:4543–4551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirchmeyer S, Reuter K (2005) J Mater Chem 15:2077–2088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Groenendaal L, Jonas F, Freitag D, Pielartzik H, Reynolds JR (2000) Adv Mater 12:481–494Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Soderstrom C, Rudnitskaya A, Legin A, Krantz-Rulcker C (2005) J Biotechnol 119:200–308Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ciosek P, Wroblewski W (2006) Sensor Actuat B 114:85–93Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parra V, Arrieta AA, Fernandez-Escudero JA, Iniguez M, de Saja JA, Rodrıguez-Mendez ML (2006) Anal Chim Acta 563:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Martina
    • 1
  • K. Ionescu
    • 1
  • L. Pigani
    • 1
  • F. Terzi
    • 1
  • A. Ulrici
    • 2
  • C. Zanardi
    • 1
  • R. Seeber
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di ChimicaUniversità di Modena e Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze AgrarieUniversità degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly

Personalised recommendations