Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 386, Issue 5, pp 1497–1503 | Cite as

Improvement of HS-SPME for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in water samples by simultaneous direct fiber cooling and freezing of analyte solution

Original Paper

Abstract

The sensitivity and precision of headspace solid-phase micro extraction (HS-SPME) at an analyte solution temperature (T as) of +35 °C and a fiber temperature (T fiber) of +5 °C were compared with those for HS-SPME at T as and T fiber of −20 °C for analysis of the volatile organic compounds benzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, toluene, o-xylene, ethylbenzene, m/p-xylene, and tetrachloroethylene in water samples. The effect of simultaneous fiber cooling and analyte solution freezing during extraction was studied. The compounds are of different hydrophobicity, with octanol/water partition coefficients (Kow) ranging from 126 and 2511. During a first set of experiments the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) SPME fiber was cooled to +5 °C with simultaneous heating of the aqueous analyte solution to +35 °C. During a second set of experiments, both SPME fiber holder and samples were placed in a deep freezer maintained at −20 °C for a total extraction time of 30 min. After approximately 2 min the analyte solution in the vial began to freeze from the side inwards and from the bottom upwards. After approximately 30 min the solution was completely frozen. Analysis of VOC was performed by coupling HS-SPME to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In general, i.e. except for tetrachloroethylene, the sensitivity of HS-SPME increased with increasing compound hydrophobicity at both analyte solution and fiber temperatures. At T as of +35 °C and T fiber of +5 °C detection limits of HS-SPME were 0.5 μg L−1 for benzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene, 0.125 μg L−1 for toluene, and 0.025 μg L−1 for ethylbenzene, m/p-xylene, and o-xylene. In the experiments with T as and T fiber of −20 °C, detection limits were reduced for compounds of low hydrophobicity (Kow<501), for example benzene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and trichloroethylene. In the concentration range 0.5–62.5 μg L−1, the sensitivity of HS-SPME was enhanced by a factor of approximately two for all compounds by performing the extraction at −20 °C. A possible explanation is that freezing of the water sample results in higher concentration of the target compounds in the residual liquid phase and gas phase (freezing-out), combined with enhanced adsorption of the compounds by the cooled fiber. The precision of HS-SPME, expressed as the relative standard deviation and the linearity of the regression lines, is increased for more hydrophobic compounds (Kow>501) by simultaneous direct fiber cooling and freezing of analyte solution. Background contamination during analysis is reduced significantly by avoiding the use of organic solvents.

Keywords

HS-SPME VOC Freezing-out Volatile organic compounds Water samples 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Ligocki MP, Leuenberger C, Pankow JF (1985) Atmos Environ 19:1609–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czuczwa J, Leuenberger C, Giger W (1988) Atmos Environ 22:907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Achten C, Kolb A, Püttmann W (2001) Atmos Environ 35:6337–6345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schimming E, Levsen K, Köhme C, Schürmann W (1999) Fresenius Anal Chem 363:88–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Achten C, Kolb A, Püttmann W (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 371:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J (1990) Anal Chem 62:2145–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pawliszyn J (1997) Solid phase micro extraction, theory and practice. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arthur CL, Killam LM, Motlagh S, Lim M, Potter DP, Pawliszyn J (1992) Environ Sci Technol 26:979–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poerschmann J, Górecki T, Kopinke F-D (2000) Environ Sci Technol 34:3824–3830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Z, Pawliszyn J (1993) J Anal Chem 65:1843–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang Z, Pawliszyn J (1995) Anal Chem 67:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Achten C, Püttmann W (2000) Environ Sci Technol 34:1359–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Potter DW, Pawliszyn J (1992) J Chromatogr 625:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexandrou N, Lawrence M, Pawliszyn J (1992) Anal Chem 64:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robbat A, Liu T, Abraham B (1992) Anal Chem 64:1477–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fischer A, Müller M, Klasmeier J (2004) Chemosphere 54:689–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shapiro J (1961) Science 133:2063–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burris L, Stockmann CH, Dilon IG (1955) J Metals 7:1017Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pfann WG (1952) J Metals 4:747Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pfann WG (1966) Zone melting. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilcox WR, Zief M (1967) Fractional solidification. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sato K (2003) PhD Thesis, Osaka Prefecture UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jayne JT, Duan SX, Davidovits P, Worsnop DR, Zahniser MS, Kolb CE (1991) J Phys Chem 95:6329CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Atmosphäre und UmweltJ.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations