Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 380, Issue 1, pp 168–177 | Cite as

Use of the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate in countercurrent chromatography

Original Paper

Abstract

Room temperature ionic liquids (RTIL) are molten salts that are liquids at room temperature. Their liquid state makes them possible candidates as solvents in countercurrent chromatography (CCC), which uses solvents as both the mobile and stationary phases. The study focuses on 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate (BMIM PF6), an easy to synthesize and purify RTIL whose melting point is −8°C. It is shown that BMIM PF6 behaves like a solvent of significant polarity (comparable with that of ethanol). The ternary phase diagram water–acetonitrile–BMIM PF6 is given, because it was necessary to add acetonitrile to reduce the ionic liquid viscosity. The 40:20:40% w/w water–acetonitrile–BMIM PF6 biphasic liquid system was found to be appropriate as a biphasic liquid system for CCC. Different aromatic solutes, including bases, acids, and neutral compounds, were injected into the CCC column to estimate their distribution constants between the ionic liquid-rich phase and the aqueous phase. The resulting Kil/w constants were compared with the corresponding literature octanol–water partition coefficients, Ko/w. The important drawbacks in the use of RTIL in CCC are clearly pointed out: high viscosity producing pressure build-up, UV absorbance limiting the use of the convenient UV detector, and non-volatility precluding the use of the evaporative light-scattering detector for continuous detection.

Keywords

Countercurrent chromatography 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate Ionic liquid Distribution constant Hydrophobicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

SCB thanks the European Community for the Marie Curie fellowship HPMF-CT-2000-00440 (Human Potential) and the foundation Caixa Castelló Bancaixa, both of which made this work possible. AB thanks the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR–5180 for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Berthod A (2002) Countercurrent chromatography. The support-free liquid stationary phase. In: Barcelo D (ed) Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol 38. Elsevier, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Craig LC, Post O (1949) Apparatus for countercurrent distribution. Anal Chem 21:500–504Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rice NM, Irving HMNH, Leonard MA (1993) Nomenclature for liquid-liquid distribution (solvent extraction). Pure Appl Chem 65:2373–2396Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mandava NB, Ito Y (1985) Countercurrent chromatography, theory and practice. Chromatographic Science Series, vol 44. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conway WD (1990) Countercurrent chromatography, apparatus, theory and applications. VCH Publishers, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poole CF (2004) Chromatographic and spectroscopic methods for the determination of solvent properties of room temperature ionic liquids. J Chromatogr A 1039:377–399Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Welton T (1999) Room temperature ionic liquid. Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. Chem Rev 99:2071–2083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Earle MJ, Seddon KR (2000) Ionic liquids. Green solvents for the future. Pure Appl Chem 72:1391–1398Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chauvin Y, Olivier-Bourbigou H (1995) Nonaqueous ionic liquids as reaction solvents, Chemtech 25:26–30Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ngo HL, LeCompte K, Hargens L, McEwen AB (2000) Thermal properties of imidazolium ionic liquid, Thermochim Acta 357:97–102Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carda-Broch S, Berthod A, Armstrong DW (2003) Solvent properties of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ionic liquid. Anal Bioanal Chem 375:191–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berthod A, Carda-Broch S (2003) A new class of solvents for CCC: the room temperature ionic liquids. J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol 26:1493–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ito Y (1999) Coil planet centrifuge for high speed countercurrent chromatography. In: Menet JM, Thiebaut D (eds) Countercurrent chromatography. Chromatographic Science Series, vol 82. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berthod A, Bully M (1991) High speed countercurrent chromatography used for alkylbenzene liquid-liquid partition coefficient determination, Anal Chem 63:2508–2512Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Du Q, Wu C, Qian G, Wu P, Ito Y (1999) Relationship between the flow-rate of the mobile phase and retention of the stationary phase in CCC. J Chromatogr A 835:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Menges RA, Bertrand GL, Armstrong DW (1990) Direct measurement of octanol-water partition coefficients using centrifugal partition chromatography with a back-flushing technique. J Liq Chromatogr 13:3061–3077Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gluck SJ, Martin EJ (1990) Assessment of centrifugal partition chromatography for determination of octanol-water partition coefficients. J Liq Chromatogr 13:2529–2542Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berthod A (1995) Liquid–liquid partition coefficients. The particular case of octanol-water coefficients. In: Foucault A (ed) Centrifugal partition chromatography. Chromatographic Science Series, vol 68, chap 7. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 167–197Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ClogP Computer Program, version 4.01. BioByte Corp., Claremont. http://www.daylight.com/daycgi/clogp

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire des Sciences Analytiques, CNRSUniversité de Lyon 1VilleurbanneFrance

Personalised recommendations