Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 379, Issue 3, pp 332–334 | Cite as

Molecularly imprinted polymers for solid-phase extraction

  • Jun HaginakaEmail author
Trends

Molecular recognition plays an important role in biological and chemical processes. Since molecular imprinting techniques can afford complementary binding site(s) for a target molecule, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) have been used as chromatographic media, solid-phase extraction media, artificial antibodies, and sensors [1, 2, 3] for the specific recognition of target molecules. The use of MIPs in sample concentration, clean up, screening, and isolation by solid-phase extraction (SPE) with compound-specific or group-specific extractions are highly attractive and promising applications.

Two types of MIP formats, particle and membrane types, are available for use in SPE [3]. Usually, the particle MIPs have been prepared by a non-aqueous bulk polymerization method, in which the resultant polymer rod had to be crushed, ground, and sieved to produce materials for SPE. To improve this tedious procedure, several new preparation methods for MIPs have emerged over the last decade. For...

Keywords

Target Compound Functional Monomer Template Molecule Dispersion Polymerization Alprenolol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Sellergren B (ed) (2001) Molecularly imprinted polymers: man-made mimics of antibodies and their applications in analytical chemistry. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haupt K (2003) Anal Chem 75:376A–383APubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takeuchi T, Haginaka J (1999) J Chromatogr B 728:1–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sellergren B (1994) J Chromatogr A 673:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kempe H, Kempe M (2004) Macromol Rapid Commun 25:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayes AG, Mosbach K (1996) Anal Chem 68:3769–3774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang J, Cormack PAG, Sherington DC, Khoshdel E (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:5336–5338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hosoya K, Yoshizako K, Tanaka N, Kimata K, Araki T, Haginaka J (1994) Chem Lett 1437–1438Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sergeyeva TA, Matuschewski H, Piletsky SA, Bendig J, Schedler U, Ulbricht M (2001) J Chromatogr A 907:89–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ulbricht M (2004) J Chromatogr B (in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hennion M-C, Pichon V (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:29–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boos K-S, Grimm C-H (1999) Trends Anal Chem 18:175–180Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koeber R, Fleischer, Lanza F, Boos K-S, Sellergren B, Barcelo D (2001) Anal Chem 73:2437–2444Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haginaka J, Takehira H, Hosoya K, Tanaka N (1999) J Chromatogr A 849:331–339Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanbe H, Haginaka J (2003) Analyst 128:593–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haginaka J, Sanbe H, Takehira H (1999) J Chromatogr A 857:117–125Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chapuis F, Pichon V, Lanza F, Sellergren B, Hennion M-C (2003) J Chromatogr A 999:23–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu L, Xu X (2003) J Chromatogr A 991:151–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie J, Zhu L, Xu X (2002) Anal Chem 74:2352–2360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesMukogawa Women’s UniversityNishinomiya 663-8179Japan

Personalised recommendations