Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 378, Issue 7, pp 1710–1715 | Cite as

A rapid enzyme assay for β-galactosidase using optically gated sample introduction on a microfabricated chip

Original Paper

Abstract

The ability to perform enzyme assays on microchips is demonstrated using optically gated sample introduction. The hydrolysis of fluorescein mono-β-d-galactopyranoside (FMG) by β-d-galactosidase (β-Gal) is continuously monitored using a microchip for 5 to 10 min. The outcome of the reaction was analyzed by performing serial on-chip separations of fluorescent substrate, FMG, and product, fluorescein. Kinetic information about β-Gal has been successfully obtained by varying the concentration of FMG. β-Gal enzymes from two different sources including bovine liver and E. coli., have been examined and compared to each other and to results obtained using traditional assay methods. In addition, the competitive inhibition of β-Gal by phenylethyl β-d-thiogalactoside (PETG) and β-lactose has been studied using this technique. PETG is found to have higher inhibition than lactose in the hydrolysis. This separation-based enzyme assay technique avoids the possible fluorescence interference between FMG and fluorescein, which is a problem with the traditional plate assay method. Additionally, the amount of the enzyme and substrate required with this technique is at least four orders of magnitude lower than the traditional plate assay method. By using optically gated sample introduction, microchips allow continuous serial injections and separations without any potential switch, thus making this technique ideal as a sensor for enzyme assays. This technique should therefore be valuable for high-throughput screening in the drug discovery industry.

Keywords

Enzyme assay Optically gated sample introduction Microfabricated chip 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research is provided by the National Institute of Heath and National Science Foundation. The authors thank Marc Maxson, at the Huck Institute, Pennsylvania State University, for helpful suggestions, the EMPRL Nanofabrication Facility, Pennsylvania State University, for assistance with microchip fabrication, and Dr Anne M. Andrews, Department of Chemistry, for helpful suggestions with the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramsey JM, Jacobson SC, Knapp MR (1995) Nat Med 1:1093–1096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kricka LJ (1998) J Clin Chem 44:2008–2014Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khandurina J, Guttman A (2002) J Chromatogr A 943:159–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guilbault GG (1990) Practical fluorescence. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auroux PA, Iossifidis D, Reyes DR, Manz A (2002) Anal Chem 74:2637–2652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guijt RM, Baltussen E, Dedem GW (2002) Electrophoresis. 23:823–835Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medintz IL, Paegel BM, Blazej RG, Emrich CA, Berti L, Scherer JR, Mathies RA (2001) Electrophoresis 22:3845–3856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitnik L, Novotny M, Felten C, Buonocore S, Koutny L, Schmalzing D (2001) Electrophoresis 22:4104–4117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verpoorte E (2002) Electrophoresis 23:677–712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang J (2002) Electrophoresis 23:713–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hadd AG, Raymond DE, Halliwell JW, Jacobson SC, Ramsey JM (1997) Anal Chem 69:3407–3412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hadd AG, Jacobson SC, Ramsey JM (1999) Anal Chem 71:5206–5212Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen CB, Chin-Dixon E, Jeong S, Nikiforov TT (1999) Anal Biochem 273:89–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Starkey DE, Han A, Bao JJ, Ahn CH, Wehmeyer KR, Prenger MC, Halsall HB, Heineman WR (2001) J Chromatogr B 762:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burke BJ, Regnier FE (2003) Anal Chem 75:1786–1791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapos JA, Ewing AG (2000) Anal Chem 72:4598–4602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roddy ES, Lapos JA, Ewing AG (2003) J Chromatogr (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu H, Roddy TP, Lapos JA, Ewing A G (2002) Anal Chem 74:5517–5522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu H, Roddy ES, Roddy TP, Lapos JA, Ewing AG (2003) (in press)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wallenfels K, Well R (1972) The enzymes, vol 7. Academic Press, New York, pp 617–663Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou QZ, Chen XD, Li X (2003) Biotechnol Bioeng 81:127–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carrara CR, Rubiolo AC (1997) Chem Eng J 65:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Russo-Marie F, Roederer M, Sager B, Herzenberg LA, Kaiser D (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8194–8198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang Z, Haugland RP, Szalecka D (1992) Biotech 13:543–546Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hofmann J, Sernetz M (1983) Anal Biochem 131:180–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang Z (1991) Biochem 30:8530–8534Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hofmann J, Sernetz M (1984) Anal Chim Acta 163:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM (1993) Principles of biochemistry. Worth, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.152 Davey Lab, Department of ChemistryPennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations