Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 377, Issue 2, pp 356–361 | Cite as

Amperometric and spectrophotometric determination of carbaryl in natural waters and commercial formulations

  • Dionísia C. Portela
  • Isabel M. F. Pereira
  • Paula Paíga
  • Cristina Delerue-Matos
  • M. Carmo V. F. Vaz
Original Paper

Abstract

The work presented describes the development and evaluation of two flow-injection analysis (FIA) systems for the automated determination of carbaryl in spiked natural waters and commercial formulations. Samples are injected directly into the system where they are subjected to alkaline hydrolysis thus forming 1-naphthol. This product is readily oxidised at a glassy carbon electrode. The electrochemical behaviour of 1-naphthol allows the development of an FIA system with an amperometric detector in which 1-naphthol determination, and thus measurement of carbaryl concentration, can be performed. Linear response over the range 1.0×10−7 to 1.0×10−5 mol L−1, with a sampling rate of 80 samples h−1, was recorded. The detection limit was 1.0×10−8 mol L−1. Another FIA manifold was constructed but this used a colorimetric detector. The methodology was based on the coupling of 1-naphthol with phenylhydrazine hydrochloride to produce a red complex which has maximum absorbance at 495 nm. The response was linear from 1.0×10−5 to 1.5×10−3 mol L−1 with a detection limit of 1.0×10−6 mol L−1. Sample-throughput was about 60 samples h−1. Validation of the results provided by the two FIA methodologies was performed by comparing them with results from a standard HPLC–UV technique. The relative deviation was <5%. Recovery trials were also carried out and the values obtained ranged from 97.0 to 102.0% for both methods. The repeatability (RSD, %) of 12 consecutive injections of one sample was 0.8% and 1.6% for the amperometric and colorimetric systems, respectively.

Keywords

Amperometry Spectrophotometry Carbaryl Pesticides Flow-injection analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Guiberteau A, Díaz TG, Salinas F, Ortiz JM (1995) Anal Chim Acta 307:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pérez-López JA, Zapardiek A, Bermejo E, Arauzo E, Hernández L (1994) Fresenius J Anal Chem 350:620–625Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gil-Agusti M, Alvarez-Rodriguez L, Monferrer-Pons L, Bose D, Durgbanshi A, Esteve-Romero J (2002) Anal Lett 35:1721–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Toscano IAS, Ribeiro ML, Santelli SE, Guardia M (2000) Quim Nova 23:466–471Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hidalgo C, Sancho JV, Roig-Navarro A, Hernandez F (1998) Chromatographia 47:596–600Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abad A, Moreno MJ, Pelegri R, Martinez MI, Saez A, Gamon M, Montoya A (1999) J Chromatogr A 833:3–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diaz TG, Guiberteau A, Salinas F, Ortiz JM (1996) J Liq Chromatogr Related Technol 19:2681–2690Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patil VB, Shingare MS (1993) J Chromatogr A 653:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tunceli A, Bag H, Turker AR ( 2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 371:1134–1138Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demirbas A (2000) Environ Technol 21:351–356Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demirbas A (1998) Sci Total Environ 220:235–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alvarez Rodriguez L, Monferrer-Pons L, Esteve Romero JS, Garcia Alvarez CMC, Ramis Ramos G (1997) Analyst 122:459–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daghbouche Y, Garrigues S, Guardia M (1995) Anal Chim Acta 314:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reis BF, Morales-Rubio A, Guardia M (1999) Anal Chim Acta 392:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cassela RJ, Garrigues S, Santelli RE, Guardia M (2000) Talanta 52:717–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    La Rosa C, Pariente F, Hernández L, Lorenzo E (1995) Anal Chim Acta 308:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alegret S, Alonso J, Bartroli J, Machado AASC, Lima JLFC, Paulis JM (1987) Quim Anal 6:278–292Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riedel–de Haën (1999) Certificate of analysis, carbarylGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruzicka J, Hansen EH (1988) Flow-injection analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Metrohm (1984) Electrochemical detection in HPLC. Metrohm AG, CH-9100, HerisauGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller JC, Miller JN (1993) Statistics for analytical chemistry, 3rd edn. Ellis Horwood, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dionísia C. Portela
    • 1
  • Isabel M. F. Pereira
    • 1
  • Paula Paíga
    • 1
  • Cristina Delerue-Matos
    • 1
  • M. Carmo V. F. Vaz
    • 1
  1. 1.CEQUP/Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do PortoInstituto Politécnico do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations