Advertisement

DFT study of small gas molecules adsorbed on undoped and N-, Si-, B-, and Al-doped graphene quantum dots

  • F. Montejo-Alvaro
  • J. Oliva
  • M. Herrera-Trejo
  • H. M. Hdz-García
  • A. I. Mtz-EnriquezEmail author
Regular Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

A theoretical study about the interaction between small gas molecules (H2O, CO, CO2, NH3, and CH4) with graphene quantum dots (GQDs) was performed. To develop gas sensors with ultralow detection levels, the nature of the bonds between the gas molecules and the GQDs should be understood and controlled. It was found that the binding energy (Eb) of the gas molecules with the GQDs can be controlled if the GQDs are doped. In the first part of the investigation, a choice of appropriated exchange/correlation functionals and basis sets was achieved. After this, the pure generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functionals, including the non-local (NL) density-dependent dispersion correction and the atom-pairwise dispersion correction (D3), were employed and found that they described accurately the Eb for the adsorption of water on GQDs. The use of NL and D3 corrected GGA functionals revealed that the Eb for the adsorption of H2O, CO, and NH3 on Si- and Al-doped GQDs can be improved, which indicates that the detection limit for the detection of these gases can be enhanced. To understand the nature of the bonds involved in the adsorption, different approaches were used, such as the quantum theory of atom in molecules and the electron localization function.

Keywords

DFT van der Waals corrected functionals Gas sensor Graphene Coronene 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Conacyt. The authors wish to thank the supercomputer facilities of Xiuhcoatl and Abacus. FMA thanks to Conacyt for the received PhD scholarship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Schedin F, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Hill EW, Blake P, Katsnelson MI, Novoselov KS (2007) Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater 6:652–655.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peyghan AA, Rastegar SF, Bagheri Z (2015) Selective detection of F2 in the presence of CO, N2, O2, and H2 molecules using a ZnO nanocluster. Monatshefte Fur Chem 146:1233–1239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-014-1378-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pashangpour M, Peyghan AA (2015) Adsorption of carbon monoxide on the pristine, B- and Al-doped C3N nanosheets. J Mol Model 2:1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-015-2648-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim JH, Zhou Q, Chang J (2017) Suspended graphene-based gas sensor with 1-mW energy consumption. Micromachines 8:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8020044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ao ZM, Yang J, Li S, Jiang Q (2008) Enhancement of CO detection in Al doped graphene. Chem Phys Lett 461:276–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.07.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lv R, Li Q, Botello-Méndez AR, Hayashi T, Wang B, Berkdemir A, Hao Q, Eléas AL, Cruz-Silva R, Gutiérrez HR, Kim YA, Muramatsu H, Zhu J, Endo M, Terrones H, Charlier JC, Pan M, Terrones M (2012) Nitrogen-doped graphene: beyond single substitution and enhanced molecular sensing. Sci Rep 2:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Y-H, Chen Y-B, Zhou K-G, Liu C-H, Zeng J, Zhang H-L, Peng Y (2009) Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: a first-principles study. Nanotechnology 20:185504.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai J, Yuan J, Giannozzi P (2009) Gas adsorption on graphene doped with B, N, Al, and S: a theoretical study. Appl Phys Lett 9:5.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3272008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen Y, Gao B, Zhao JX, Cai QH, Fu HG (2012) Si-doped graphene: an ideal sensor for NO- or NO 2-detection and metal-free catalyst for N 2O-reduction. J Mol Model 18:2043–2054.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-011-1226-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peyghan AA, Rastegar SF, Hadipour NL (2014) DFT study of NH3 adsorption on pristine, Ni- and Si-doped graphynes. Phys Lett Sect A Gen At Solid State Phys 378:2184–2190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2014.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ketabi N, de Boer T, Karakaya M, Zhu J, Podila R, Rao AM, Kurmaev EZ, Moewes A (2016) Tuning the electronic structure of graphene through nitrogen doping: experiment and theory. RSC Adv 6:56721–56727.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA07546K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lv R, Chen G, Li Q, McCreary A, Botello-Méndez A, Morozov SV, Liang L, Declerck X, Perea-López N, Cullen DA, Feng S, Elías AL, Cruz-Silva R, Fujisawa K, Endo M, Kang F, Charlier J-C, Meunier V, Pan M, Harutyunyan AR, Novoselov KS, Terrones M (2015) Ultrasensitive gas detection of large-area boron-doped graphene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:14527–14532.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505993112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li H, Gao Z, Lin W, He W, Li J, Yang Y (2017) Improving the sensitive property of graphene-based gas sensor by illumination and heating. Sens Rev 37:142–146.  https://doi.org/10.1108/SR-09-2016-0168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mortazavi Zanjani SM, Sadeghi MM, Holt M, Chowdhury SF, Tao L, Akinwande D (2016) Enhanced sensitivity of graphene ammonia gas sensors using molecular doping. Appl Phys Lett 108:033106.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lange U, Hirsch T, Mirsky VM, Wolfbeis OS (2011) Hydrogen sensor based on a graphene-palladium nanocomposite. Electrochim Acta 56:3707–3712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu S, Sun H, Liu X, Zhuang J, Zhao L (2017) Room-temperature NH3sensing of graphene oxide film and its enhanced response on the laser-textured silicon. Sci Rep 7:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15270-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rad AS (2016) Al-doped graphene as a new nanostructure adsorbent for some halomethane compounds: DFT calculations. Surf Sci 645:6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2015.10.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Esrafili MD, Nematollahi P, Abdollahpour H (2016) A comparative DFT study on the CO oxidation reaction over Al- and Ge-embedded graphene as efficient metal-free catalysts. Appl Surf Sci 378:418–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang Y, Chen J, Huang X (2016) Adsorption behavior of B-doped/N-doped graphene sheets toward NO2, NO and NH3 molecules: a first-principles study. Phys Status Solidi 12:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.201600110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chi M, Zhao YP (2009) Adsorption of formaldehyde molecule on the intrinsic and Al-doped graphene: a first principle study. Comput Mater Sci 46:1085–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang Y, Chen W, Li C, Pan L, Dai X, Ma D (2015) Adsorption behavior of Co anchored on graphene sheets toward NO, SO2, NH3, CO and HCN molecules. Appl Surf Sci 342:191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deretzis I, Forte G, Grassi A, La Magna A, Piccitto G, Pucci R (2010) A multiscale study of electronic structure and quantum transport in C6n2H6n -based graphene quantum dots. J Phys Condens Matter 22:095504.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/9/095504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qiu NX, Xue Y, Guo Y, Sun WJ, Chu W (2012) Adsorption of methane on carbon models of coal surface studied by the density functional theory including dispersion correction (DFT-D3). Comput Theor Chem 992:37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2012.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rubeš M, Nachtigall P, Vondrášek J, Bludský O (2009) Structure and stability of the water–graphite complexes. J Phys Chem C 113:8412–8419.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp901410m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joucken F, Tison Y, Le Fèvre P, Tejeda A, Taleb-Ibrahimi A, Conrad E, Repain V, Chacon C, Bellec A, Girard Y, Rousset S, Ghijsen J, Sporken R, Amara H, Ducastelle F, Lagoute J (2015) Charge transfer and electronic doping in nitrogen-doped graphene. Sci Rep 5:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neese F (2012) The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hujo W, Grimme S (2011) Performance of the van der Waals density functional VV10 and (hybrid)GGA variants for thermochemistry and noncovalent interactions. J Chem Theory Comput 7:3866–3871.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200644w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L (2010) Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J Comput Chem 32:1456–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weigend F, Ahlrichs R (2005) Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:3297.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b508541a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boys SF, Bernardi F (1970) The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol Phys 19:553–566.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977000101561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lu T, Chen F (2012) Multiwfn: a multifunctional wave function analyzer. J Comput Chem 33:580–592.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Voloshina E, Usvyat D, Schütz M, Dedkov Y, Paulus B (2011) On the physisorption of water on graphene: a CCSD(T) study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:12041–12047.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP20609E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu XQ, Xue Y, Tian ZY, Mo JJ, Qiu NX, Chu W, Xie HP (2013) Adsorption of CH4 on nitrogen- and boron-containing carbon models of coal predicted by density-functional theory. Appl Surf Sci 285:190–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wood BC, Bhide SY, Dutta D, Kandagal VS, Pathak AD, Punnathanam SN, Ayappa KG, Narasimhan S (2012) Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption on edge-functionalized graphene: a comparative DFT study. J Chem Phys 137:054702.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4736568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ma J, Alfè D, Michaelides A, Wang E (2009) The water-benzene interaction: insight from electronic structure theories. J Chem Phys 130:154303.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3111035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsuzuki S, Honda K, Uchimaru T, Mikami M, Tanabe K (2000) Origin of the attraction and directionality of the NH/pi interaction: comparison with OH/pi and CH/pi Interactions. J Am Chem Soc 122:11450–11458.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja001901a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Silvestrelli PL, Ambrosetti A (2014) Including screening in van der Waals corrected density functional theory calculations: the case of atoms and small molecules physisorbed on graphene. J Chem Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cheng B-M, Grover JR, Walters EA (1995) Dissociation energy of the benzene-water van der Waals complex. Chem Phys Lett 232:364–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(94)01363-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Courty A, Mons M, Dimicoli I, Piuzzi F, Gaigeot MP, Brenner V, de Pujo P, Millié P (1998) Quantum effects in the threshold photoionization and energetics of the benzene-H2O and benzene-D2O complexes: experiment and simulation. J Phys Chem A 102:6590–6600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rad AS, Foukolaei VP (2015) Density functional study of Al-doped graphene nanostructure towards adsorption of CO, CO2 and H2O. Synth Met 210:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Denis PA (2010) Band gap opening of monolayer and bilayer graphene doped with aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, and sulfur. Chem Phys Lett 492:251–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chen Y, Gao B, Zhao J, Cai Q (2012) Si-doped graphene: an ideal sensor for NO- or NO2 -detection and metal-free catalyst for N2O-reduction. J Mol Model 18:2043–2054.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-011-1226-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thierfelder C, Witte M, Blankenburg S, Rauls E, Schmidt WG (2011) Methane adsorption on graphene from first principles including dispersion interaction. Surf Sci 605:746–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2011.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Anithaa VS, Shankar R, Vijayakumar S (2017) DFT-based investigation on adsorption of methane on pristine and defected graphene. Struct Chem 28:1935–1952.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-0988-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Steiner T (2002) The hydrogen bond in the solid state. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:49–76.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020104)41:1%3c48:AID-ANIE48%3e3.0.CO;2-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Varghese SS, Swaminathan S, Singh KK, Mittal V (2016) Ab initio study on gas sensing properties of group III (B, Al and Ga) doped graphene. Comput Condens Matter 9:40–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocom.2016.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zou Y, Li F, Zhu ZH, Zhao MW, Xu XG, Su XY (2011) An ab initio study on gas sensing properties of graphene and Si-doped graphene. Eur Phys J B 81:475–479.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20225-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gaston N, Schwerdtfeger P (2006) From the van der Waals dimer to the solid state of mercury with relativistic ab initio and density functional theory. Phys Rev B 74:024105.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.024105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mandado M, Krishtal A, Van Alsenoy C, Bultinck P, Hermida-Ramón JM (2007) Bonding study in all-metal clusters containing Al4 units. J Phys Chem A 111:11885–11893.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074973y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Alcantar-Medina KO, Herrera-Trejo M, Tlahuice-Flores A, Martinez-Vargas S, Oliva J, Martinez AI (2017) Evolution of the structural and electronic properties of small alkali metal-doped aluminum clusters. Comput Theor Chem 1099:55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2016.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Martinez AI (2009) Computational study of organometallic structures for hydrogen storage, effects of ligands. J Nano Res 5:113–119.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.5.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shakourian-Fard M, Jamshidi Z, Bayat A, Kamath G (2015) Meta-hybrid density functional theory study of adsorption of imidazolium- and ammonium-based ionic liquids on graphene sheet. J Phys Chem C 119:7095–7108.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp512020q CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cinvestav Unidad SaltilloRamos ArizpeMexico
  2. 2.CONACYT-Facultad de Ciencias QuimicasUniversidad Autónoma de CoahuilaSaltilloMexico
  3. 3.Corporación Mexicana de Investigación en Materiales S.A. de C.VSaltilloMexico

Personalised recommendations