Current functional theory for multi-electron configuration
- 62 Downloads
The density functional theory (DFT) formalism is reformulated into a framework of currents so as to give the energy a parameter dependent behaviour, e.g., time. This “current” method is aimed at describing the transition of electrons from one orbital to another and especially from the ground state to an excited state and extended to the relativistic region in order to include magnetic fields which is relevant especially for heavy metallic compounds. The formalism leads to a set of coupled first order partial differential equations to describe the time evolution of atoms and molecules. The application of the method to ZnO and H2O to calculate the occupation probabilities of the orbitals lead to the results that compare favorably with those obtained from DFT. Furthermore, evolution equations for electrons in both atoms and molecules can be derived. Applications to specific examples of small molecules (being metallo-oxides and water) are mentioned at the end.
KeywordsDensity functional theory Current DFT Continuity equations
The staff at QuP Center and the Department of Physics at the Technical University of Denmark and especially Karl J. Jalkanen, FRSC, are acknowledged for helpful discussions and computer-aid. Furthermore, Professors Benny Lautrup and Holger Bech Nielsen are acknowledged for helpful critique.
- 7.Jalkanen KJ, Suhai S, Bohr HG (2009) Handbook of molecular biophysics, 7–66. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 8.Davidov AS (1965) Quantum mechanics. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 9.Koostra F, de Boeis PL, van Leeuwen R, Snijders JG (2002) Reviews of modern quantum chemistry. In: Sen KD (ed) World Scientific, Singapore, pp 1155–1185Google Scholar
- 10.Harbola MK (2002) Reviews of modern quantum chemistry. In: Sen KD (ed) World Scientific, Singapore, pp 1226–1236Google Scholar
- 11.Sen KD (ed) (2002) Reviews of modern quantum chemistry. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bang JN, Bohr HG, da Providencia J (2009) Handbook of molecular biophysics. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp 135–165Google Scholar
- 14.Kamke E (1983) Differentialgleichungen. Teupner, StuttgarttGoogle Scholar
- 18.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD and Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2004) Gaussian 03, Revision E.01. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CTGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hameka H (2002) Reviews of modern quantum chemistry. In: Sen KD (ed) World Scientific, Singapore, pp 1237–1246Google Scholar