Moral decision making under modafinil: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover fMRI study
Modafinil is increasingly used by healthy humans as a neuroenhancer in order to improve cognitive functioning. Research on the effects of modafinil on cognition yielded most consistent findings for complex tasks relying on the prefrontal cortex (PFC).
The present randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study aimed to investigate the effect of a single dose of modafinil (200 mg) on everyday moral decision making and its neural correlates, which have been linked to the ventro- and dorsomedial PFC.
Healthy male study participants were presented with short stories describing everyday moral or neutral dilemmas. Each moral dilemma required a decision between a personal desire and a moral standard, while the neutral dilemmas required decisions between two personal desires. The participants underwent this task twice, once under the influence of modafinil and once under placebo. Brain activity associated with the processing of the dilemmas was assessed by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging.
For the processing of moral vs. neutral dilemmas, activations were found in a network of brain regions linked to social cognitive processes including, among others, the bilateral medial PFC, the insula, and the precuneus. Modafinil was found to increase the number of moral decisions and had no effect on brain activity associated with dilemma processing. Exploratory analyses revealed reduced response-locked activity in the dorsomedial PFC for moral compared to neutral dilemmas under modafinil, but not under placebo.
The results are discussed in terms of altered predictions of others’ emotional states under modafinil, possibly due to higher processing efficiency.
KeywordsMoral reasoning Decision making Modafinil Prefrontal cortex fMRI
We would like to thank the Mercator Foundation for financial support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bellebaum C, Kuchinke L, Roser P (2017) Modafinil alters decision making based on feedback history—a randomized placebo-controlled double blind study in humans. J Psychopharmacol 31:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116668591
- Bernhardt BC, Singer T (2012) The neural basis of empathy. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150536 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bond AJ, Lader MH (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cabanis M, Pyka M, Mehl S, Müller BW, Loos-Jankowiak S, Winterer G, Wölwer W, Musso F, Klingberg S, Rapp AM, Langohr K, Wiedemann G, Herrlich J, Walter H, Wagner M, Schnell K, Vogeley K, Kockler H, Shah NJ, Stöcker T, Thienel R, Pauly K, Krug A, Kircher T (2013) The precuneus and the insula in self-attributional processes. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 13:330–345. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0143-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esposito R, Cilli F, Pieramico V, Ferretti A, Macchia A, Tommasi M, Saggino A, Ciavardelli D, Manna A, Navarra R, Cieri F, Stuppia L, Tartaro A, Sensi SL (2013) Acute effects of modafinil on brain resting state networks in young healthy subjects. PLoS One 8:e69224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069224 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ethofer T, Bretscher J, Wiethoff S, Bisch J, Schlipf S, Wildgruber D, Kreifelts B (2013) Functional responses and structural connections of cortical areas for processing faces and voices in the superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage 76:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franke AG, Bonertz C, Christmann M, Huss M, Fellgiebel A, Hildt E, Lieb K (2011) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 44:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268417 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greene JD (2007) Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cogn Sci 11:322–323; author reply 323-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004
- Madras BK, Xie Z, Lin Z, Jassen A, Panas H, Lynch L, Johnson R, Livni E, Spencer TJ, Bonab AA, Miller GM, Fischman AJ (2006) Modafinil occupies dopamine and norepinephrine transporters in vivo and modulates the transporters and trace amine activity in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 319:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.106583 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R (2007) Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends Cogn Sci 11:319–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.001
- Ott T, Nieder A (2019) Dopamine and cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 23:213–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.006
- Raichle ME (2015) The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 38:433–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasetti R, Mattay VS, Stankevich B, Skjei K, Blasi G, Sambataro F, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Goldberg TE, Callicott JH, Apud JA, Weinberger DR (2010) Modulatory effects of modafinil on neural circuits regulating emotion and cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2101–2109. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.83 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sommer M, Rothmayr C, Döhnel K, Meinhardt J, Schwerdtner J, Sodian B, Hajak G (2010) How should I decide? The neural correlates of everyday moral reasoning. Neuropsychologia 48:2018–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Logan J, Alexoff D, Zhu W, Telang F, Wang G-J, Jayne M, Hooker JM, Wong C, Hubbard B, Carter P, Warner D, King P, Shea C, Xu Y, Muench L, Apelskog-Torres K (2009) Effects of modafinil on dopamine and dopamine transporters in the male human brain: clinical implications. JAMA 301:1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.351 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar