Inhibiting automatic negative social responses in alcohol intoxication: interactions with theory of mind ability and level of task guidance
Alcohol intoxication is associated with socially disinhibited behaviours that may reflect impaired social cognitive abilities that guide social behaviour. The effects of alcohol on social cognition and how this may contribute to disinhibited behaviour are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine whether intoxicated individuals could inhibit automatic negative responses to negative social information, whether these difficulties were reliant on theory of mind (ToM) ability and whether intoxicated individuals were able to adjust verbal responses when provided with guidelines about how to respond.
Sixty-four participants aged between 18 and 34 (balanced for gender) consumed a beverage containing either placebo or alcohol calculated to achieve a target BrAC of 0.080%, before completing a Flanker task, a go/no-go task and a novel measure of social disinhibition, the social disinhibition task.
Results indicate that alcohol-intoxicated individuals can inhibit negative responses to negative social information, but display difficulty inhibiting negative responses to social information that requires ToM. They also suggest that people under the influence of moderate-to-high-dose alcohol can adjust their responses when provided with specific guidelines on how to respond.
These findings may have important implications for understanding negative alcohol-related behaviours and promote the consideration of social context, social pressure and social cognitive abilities in the development of public policy and targeted interventions to prevent alcohol-related antisocial behaviours.
KeywordsAlcohol intoxication Social cognition Social disinhibition Theory of mind Alcohol myopia model
We wish to thank Tasmania Police (Launceston) for their support and loan of breathalyser equipment.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG, World Health Organization (2001) AUDIT: The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary health care. Retrieved from World Health Organisation: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67205/1/WHO_MSD_MSB_01.6a.pdf
- Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42(2):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021963001006643 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bibby H, McDonald S (2005) Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 43(1):99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
- Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64(1):135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimoska-Di Marco A, McDonald S, Kelly M, Tate R, Johnstone S (2011) A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33(4):471–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.533158 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolder PC, Holze F, Liakoni E, Harder S, Schmid Y, Liechti ME (2017) Alcohol acutely enhances decoding of positive emotions and emotional concern for positive stimuli and facilitates the viewing of sexual images. Psychopharmacology 234(1):41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4431-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dziobek I, Rogers K, Fleck S, Bahnemann M, Heekeren HR, Wolf OT, Convit A (2008) Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET). J Autism Dev Disord 38(3):464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hull JG, Slone LB (2004) Alcohol and self-regulation. In: Baumeister RF, Vohs KD (eds) Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford, New York, pp 466–491Google Scholar
- Inquisit 5.0.4 [Computer Software] (2016). Retrieved from http.//www.millisecond.com
- Manning M, Smith C, Mazerolle P (2013) The societal costs of alcohol misuse in Australia. Trends Issues Crim Crim Justice 454:1Google Scholar
- Martin CS, Earleywine M, Musty RE, Perrine M, Swift RM (1993) Development and validation of the biphasic alcohol effects scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 17(1):140–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00739.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald S, Gowland A, Randall R, Fisher A, Osborne-Crowley K, Honan C (2014) Cognitive factors underpinning poor expressive communication skills after traumatic brain injury: theory of mind or executive function? Neuropsychology 28(5):801–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000089 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald S, Honan C, Kelly M, Byom L, Rushby J (2013) Disorders of social cognition and social behaviour in adults with TBI. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code C (eds) Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
- Morgan A, McAtamney A (2009) Research in practice No. 04: Key issues in alcohol-related violence. Retrieved from Australian Institute of Criminology: http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/rip/rip04/rip04.pdf.