Electro-physiological changes in the brain induced by caffeine or glucose nasal spray
- 588 Downloads
A direct link between the mouth cavity and the brain for glucose (GLUC) and caffeine (CAF) has been established. The aim of this study is to determine whether a direct link for both substrates also exist between the nasal cavity and the brain.
Ten healthy male subjects (age 22 ± 1 years) performed three experimental trials, separated by at least 2 days. Each trial included a 20-s nasal spray (NAS) period in which solutions placebo (PLAC), GLUC, or CAF were provided in a double-blind, randomized order. During each trial, four cognitive Stroop tasks were performed: two familiarization trials and one pre- and one post-NAS trial. Reaction times and accuracy for different stimuli (neutral, NEUTR; congruent, CON; incongruent INCON) were determined. Electroencephalography was continuously measured throughout the trials. During the Stroop tasks pre- and post-NAS, the P300 was assessed and during NAS, source localization was performed using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA).
Results and discussion
NAS activated the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). CAF-NAS also increased θ and β activity in frontal cortices. Furthermore, GLUC-NAS increased the β activity within the insula. GLUC-NAS also increased the P300 amplitude with INCON (P = 0.046) and reduced P300 amplitude at F3-F4 and P300 latency at CP1-CP2-Cz with NEUTR (P = 0.001 and P = 0.016, respectively). The existence of nasal bitter and sweet taste receptors possibly induce these brain responses.
Greater cognitive efficiency was observed with GLUC-NAS. CAF-NAS activated cingulate, insular, and sensorymotor cortices, whereas GLUC-NAS activated sensory, cingulate, and insular cortices. However, no effect on the Stroop task was found.
KeywordsEEG Stroop Attention ERP P300 Source localization sLORETA
BR is a postdoctoral fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO).
Compliance with ethical standards
The experiment was approved by the institutional medical ethical committee of UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Belgium) (B.U.N. 143201421380). The subjects were provided written and oral information about the experimental procedures and potential risks before giving informed consent to participate in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Burke LM, Maughan RJ (2015) The governor has a sweet tooth—mouth sensing of nutrients to enhance sports performance. European. J Sports Sci 15(1):29–40Google Scholar
- Coles M, Smid H, Scheffers M, Otten L (1995) Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In: Rugg M, Coles M (eds) Electrophysiology of the mind: event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford Psychology Series, Oxford, pp. 86–131Google Scholar
- Donchin E, Karis D, Bashore TR, Coles MGH, Gratton G (1986) Cognitive psychophysiology: systems, processes, and applications. In: Coles MGH, Donchin E, Porges S (eds) Psychophysiology: systems, processes, and applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 244–267Google Scholar
- Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiment. Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gagnon C, Desjardins-Crépeau L, Tournier I, Desjardins M, Lesage F, Greenwood CE, Bherer L (2012) Near-infrared imaging of the effects of glucose ingestion and regulation on prefrontal activation during dual-task execution in healthy fasting older adults. Behav Brain Res 232:137–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman JE (1990) Event-related potentials and automatic and controlled processes. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson Jr R (eds) Event related brain potentials. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 145–157Google Scholar
- Jeukendrup AE, Rollo I, Carter JM (2013) Carbohydrate mouth rinse: performance effects and mechanisms. Sports Science Exchange 26(118):1–8Google Scholar
- Lee RJ, Kofonow JM, Rosen PL, Siebert AP, Chen B, Doghramji L, Xiong G, Adappa ND, Palmer JN, Kennedy DW, Kreindler JL, Margolskee RF, Cohen NA (2014) Bitter and sweet taste receptors regulate human upper respiratory innate immunity. J Clin Invest 124(3):1393–1405PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva F (2005) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Pascual-Marqui RD, Esslen M, Kechi K, Lehmann D (2002) Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): review, new comparisons, and validation. Japanese. J Clin Neurophysiol 30:81–94Google Scholar
- Stevens A, Lowe J (1997) Human histology. Mosby, Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar