Effect of combined oral doses of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) on acute and anticipatory nausea in rat models
- 433 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of oral combined cannabis constituents to reduce nausea.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of combining subthreshold oral doses of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) on acute and anticipatory nausea in rat models of conditioned gaping.
Material and methods
The potential of intragastric (i.g.) administration of THC, CBDA, or combined doses, to interfere with acute nausea-induced conditioned gaping (acute nausea) or the expression of contextually elicited conditioned gaping (anticipatory nausea), was evaluated.
For acute nausea, i.g. administration of subthreshold doses of THC (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) or CBDA (0.5 and 1 μg/kg) significantly suppressed acute nausea-induced gaping, whereas higher individual doses of both THC and CBDA were maximally effective. Combined i.g. administration of higher doses of THC and CBDA (2.5 mg/kg THC-2.5 μg/kg CBDA; 10 mg/kg THC-10 μg/kg CBDA; 20 mg/kg THC-20 μg/kg CBDA) also enhanced positive hedonic reactions elicited by saccharin solution during conditioning. For anticipatory nausea, combined subthreshold i.g. doses of THC (0.1 mg/kg) and CBDA (0.1 μg/kg) suppressed contextually elicited conditioned gaping. When administered i.g., THC was effective on its own at doses ranging from 1 to 10 mg/kg, but CBDA was only effective at 10 μg/kg. THC alone was equally effective by intraperitoneal (i.p.) and i.g. administration, whereas CBDA alone was more effective by i.p. administration (Rock et al. in Psychopharmacol (Berl) 232:4445–4454, 2015) than by i.g. administration.
Oral administration of subthreshold doses of THC and CBDA may be an effective new treatment for acute nausea and anticipatory nausea and appetite enhancement in chemotherapy patients.
KeywordsCBDA THC Oral administration Acute nausea Anticipatory nausea Conditioned gaping Hedonic reactions Locomotor activity
This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Collaborative Research and Development Grant (CRDPJ 476416–14) to LAP in partnership with Prairie Plant Systems Inc, as well as grants to LAP from NSERC (92056) and Canadian Institute of Health Research (137122).
- Bolognini D, Rock EM, Cluny NL, Cascio MG, Limebeer CL, Duncan M, Stott CG, Javid FA, Parker LA, Pertwee RG (2013) Cannabidiolic acid prevents vomiting in Suncus murinus and nausea-induced behaviour in rats by enhancing 5-HT1A receptor activation. Br J Pharmacol 168:1456–70. doi: 10.1111/bph.12043 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hesketh PJ, Van Belle S, Aapro M, Tattersall FD, Naylor RJ, Hargreaves R, Carides AD, Evans JK, Horgan KJ (2003) Differential involvement of neurotransmitters through the time course of cisplatin-induced emesis as revealed by therapy with specific receptor antagonists. Eur J Cancer 39:1074–1080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limebeer CL, Vemuri VK, Bedard H, Lang ST, Ossenkopp KP, Makriyannis A, Parker LA (2010) Inverse agonism of cannabinoid CB1 receptors potentiates LiCl-induced nausea in the conditioned gaping model in rats. Br J Pharmacol 161:336–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00885.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Parker LA, Mechoulam R, Schlievert C, Abbott L, Fudge ML, Burton P (2003) Effects of cannabinoids on lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions in a rat model of nausea. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 166(2):156–62Google Scholar
- Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, De Brier F, Van Heer C, Kaufman L, Derde MP, Beauduin M, Piccart M (1993) Prevention of adjustment disorders and anticipatory nausea secondary to adjuvant chemotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the usefulness of alprazolam. J Clin Oncol 11:1384–1390PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rock EM, Bolognini D, Limebeer CL, Cascio MG, Anavi-Goffer S, Fletcher PJ, Mechoulam R, Pertwee RG, Parker LA (2012) Cannabidiol, a non-psychotropic component of cannabis, attenuates vomiting and nausea-like behaviour via indirect agonism of 5-HT(1A) somatodendritic autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Br J Pharmacol 165:2620–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01621.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rock EM, Limebeer CL, Navaratnam R, Sticht MA, Bonner N, Engeland K, Downey R, Morris H, Jackson M, Parker LA (2014a) A comparison of cannabidiolic acid with other treatments for anticipatory nausea using a rat model of contextually elicited conditioned gaping. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 231:3207–15. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3498-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rock EM, Limebeer CL, Parker LA (2015) Effect of combined doses of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol THC) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) on acute and anticipatory nausea using rat (Sprague- Dawley) models of conditioned gaping. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 232:4445–54. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4080-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tomiyasu H, Takahashi M, Fujino Y, Ohno K, Tsujimoto H (2010) Gastrointestinal and hematologic adverse events after administration of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin in dogs with lymphoma that underwent a combination multidrug chemotherapy protocol. J Vet Med Sci 72:1391–1397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar