Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats
- 292 Downloads
Disorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues.
To determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during the CRT were also assessed.
In the CRT task, rats were required to withhold responding until one of two lights indicated whether responses into a left or right port would be reinforced with water. Reaction time on correct trials and premature responses were the operational definitions of attention and response inhibition, respectively. Rats were also pretreated with oral methylphenidate (0, 2, 4 mg/kg) during the CRT task to determine whether this drug would improve performance. Subsequently, during PavCA, presentation of an illuminated lever predicted the delivery of a food pellet into a food-cup. Lever-directed approach (sign-tracking) and food-cup approach (goal-tracking) were the primary measures, and rats were categorized as “sign-trackers” and “goal-trackers” using an index based on these measures.
Sign-trackers made more premature responses than goal-trackers but showed no differences in reaction time. There were sex differences in both tasks, with females having higher sign-tracking, completing more CRT trials, and making more premature responses after methylphenidate administration.
These results indicate that response inhibition is related to reward-cue responsivity, suggesting that these traits are influenced by common genetic factors.
KeywordsAutoshaping Associative learning Conditioned response Action impulsivity Motivation Stimulant drugs Classical conditioning Reward stimuli Incentive salience Feeding behavior
- Abikoff HB, Jensen PS, Arnold LL, Hoza B, Hechtman L, Pollack S, Martin D, Alvir J, March JS, Hinshaw S, Vitiello B, Newcorn J, Greiner A, Cantwell DP, Conners CK, Elliott G, Greenhill LL, Kraemer H, Pelham WE Jr, Severe JB, Swanson JM, Wells K, Wigal T (2002) Observed classroom behavior of children with ADHD: relationship to gender and comorbidity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30:349–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashare RL, Wileyto EP, Perkins KA, Schnoll RA (2013) The First 7 Days of a Quit Attempt Predicts Relapse: Validation of a Measure for Screening Medications for Nicotine Dependence. J Addict Med 7:249–254Google Scholar
- Bari A, Robbins TW (2013) Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol 108:44–79Google Scholar
- Berridge CW, Devilbiss DM, Andrzejewski ME, Arnsten AF, Kelley AE, Schmeichel B, Hamilton C, Spencer RC (2006) Methylphenidate preferentially increases catecholamine neurotransmission within the prefrontal cortex at low doses that enhance cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry 60:1111–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bindra D (1978) How adaptive behavior is produced: a perceptual-motivation alternative to response reinforcement. Behav Brain Res 1:41–91Google Scholar
- Boakes R (1977) Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, Hurwitz H (eds) Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 67–97Google Scholar
- Broos N, Schmaal L, Wiskerke J, Kostelijk L, Lam T, Stoop N, Weierink L, Ham J, de Geus EJ, Schoffelmeer AN, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, de Vries TJ, Pattij T, Goudriaan AE (2012) The relationship between impulsive choice and impulsive action: a cross-species translational study. PLoS One 7, e36781CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Caprioli D, Jupp B, Hong YT, Sawiak SJ, Ferrari V, Wharton L, Williamson DJ, McNabb C, Berry D, Aigbirhio FI, Robbins TW, Fryer TD, Dalley JW (2015) Dissociable rate-dependent effects of oral methylphenidate on impulsivity and D2/3 receptor availability in the striatum. J Neurosci 35:3747–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Castellanos FX, Elia J, Kruesi MJ, Marsh WL, Gulotta CS, Potter WZ, Ritchie GF, Hamburger SD, Rapoport JL (1996) Cerebrospinal fluid homovanillic acid predicts behavioral response to stimulants in 45 boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 14:125–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hearst E, Jenkins HM (1974) Sign-tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Monograph of the Psychonomic SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Kim E, Cheon KA, Joung YS, Kim JY, Song DH (2015) The relationship between symptomatic and functional changes of Korean children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system-methylphenidate. Clin Neuropharmacol 38:30–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leth-Steensen C, King Elbaz Z, Douglas VI (2000) Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. Acta Psychologica 104:167–190Google Scholar
- Murray JE, Dilleen R, Pelloux Y, Economidou D, Dalley JW, Belin D, Everitt BJ (2013) Increased Impulsivity Retards the Transition to Dorsolateral Striatal Dopamine Control of Cocaine Seeking. Biol Psychiatry 76(1):15–22Google Scholar
- Parker CC, Chen H, Flagel SB, Geurts AM, Richards JB, Robinson TE, Solberg Woods LC, Palmer AA (2013) Rats are the smart choice: Rationale for a renewed focus on rats in behavioral genetics. Neuropharmacology 76:250–258Google Scholar
- Posner MI, Snyder CR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol 109:160–74Google Scholar
- Robinson MJ, Anselme P, Suchomel K, Berridge KC (2015) Amphetamine-Induced Sensitization and Reward Uncertainty Similarly Enhance Incentive Salience for Conditioned Cues. Behav Neurosci 129:502–511Google Scholar
- Spencer SV, Hawk LW Jr, Richards JB, Shiels K, Pelham WE Jr, Waxmonsky JG (2009) Stimulant treatment reduces lapses in attention among children with ADHD: the effects of methylphenidate on intra-individual response time distributions. J Abnorm Child Psychol 37:805–16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Strand MT, Hawk LW Jr, Bubnik M, Shiels K, Pelham WE Jr, Waxmonsky JG (2012) Improving working memory in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the separate and combined effects of incentives and stimulant medication. J Abnorm Child Psychol 40:1193–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Weafer J, de Wit H (2013) Inattention, impulsive action, and subjective response to d-amphetamine. Drug Alcohol Depend 133:127–133Google Scholar