Psychopharmacology

, Volume 233, Issue 13, pp 2593–2605 | Cite as

Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats

  • Christopher P. King
  • Abraham A. Palmer
  • Leah C. Solberg Woods
  • Larry W. Hawk
  • Jerry B. Richards
  • Paul J. Meyer
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Disorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues.

Objectives

To determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during the CRT were also assessed.

Methods

In the CRT task, rats were required to withhold responding until one of two lights indicated whether responses into a left or right port would be reinforced with water. Reaction time on correct trials and premature responses were the operational definitions of attention and response inhibition, respectively. Rats were also pretreated with oral methylphenidate (0, 2, 4 mg/kg) during the CRT task to determine whether this drug would improve performance. Subsequently, during PavCA, presentation of an illuminated lever predicted the delivery of a food pellet into a food-cup. Lever-directed approach (sign-tracking) and food-cup approach (goal-tracking) were the primary measures, and rats were categorized as “sign-trackers” and “goal-trackers” using an index based on these measures.

Results

Sign-trackers made more premature responses than goal-trackers but showed no differences in reaction time. There were sex differences in both tasks, with females having higher sign-tracking, completing more CRT trials, and making more premature responses after methylphenidate administration.

Conclusions

These results indicate that response inhibition is related to reward-cue responsivity, suggesting that these traits are influenced by common genetic factors.

Keywords

Autoshaping Associative learning Conditioned response Action impulsivity Motivation Stimulant drugs Classical conditioning Reward stimuli Incentive salience Feeding behavior 

References

  1. Abikoff HB, Jensen PS, Arnold LL, Hoza B, Hechtman L, Pollack S, Martin D, Alvir J, March JS, Hinshaw S, Vitiello B, Newcorn J, Greiner A, Cantwell DP, Conners CK, Elliott G, Greenhill LL, Kraemer H, Pelham WE Jr, Severe JB, Swanson JM, Wells K, Wigal T (2002) Observed classroom behavior of children with ADHD: relationship to gender and comorbidity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30:349–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett AB, Pennington BF, Willcutt EG, DeFries JC, Olson RK (2015) Sex differences in ADHD symptom severity. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:632–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashare RL, Wileyto EP, Perkins KA, Schnoll RA (2013) The First 7 Days of a Quit Attempt Predicts Relapse: Validation of a Measure for Screening Medications for Nicotine Dependence. J Addict Med 7:249–254Google Scholar
  4. Bari A, Robbins TW (2013) Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol 108:44–79Google Scholar
  5. Becker JB, Molenda H, Hummer DL (2001) Gender differences in the behavioral responses to cocaine and amphetamine. Implications for mechanisms mediating gender differences in drug abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci 937:172–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Belin D, Mar AC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2008) High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking. Science 320:1352–5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentley J, Snyder F, Brown SD, Brown RW, Pond BB (2015) Sex differences in the kinetic profiles of d- and l- methylphenidate in the brains of adult rats. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19:2514–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Berridge CW, Devilbiss DM, Andrzejewski ME, Arnsten AF, Kelley AE, Schmeichel B, Hamilton C, Spencer RC (2006) Methylphenidate preferentially increases catecholamine neurotransmission within the prefrontal cortex at low doses that enhance cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry 60:1111–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bindra D (1978) How adaptive behavior is produced: a perceptual-motivation alternative to response reinforcement. Behav Brain Res 1:41–91Google Scholar
  10. Bizarro L, Patel S, Murtagh C, Stolerman IP (2004) Differential effects of psychomotor stimulants on attentional performance in rats: nicotine, amphetamine, caffeine and methylphenidate. Behav Pharmacol 15:195–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boakes R (1977) Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, Hurwitz H (eds) Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 67–97Google Scholar
  12. Bower GH (1961) A contrast effect in differential conditioning. J Exp Psychol 62:196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broos N, Schmaal L, Wiskerke J, Kostelijk L, Lam T, Stoop N, Weierink L, Ham J, de Geus EJ, Schoffelmeer AN, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, de Vries TJ, Pattij T, Goudriaan AE (2012) The relationship between impulsive choice and impulsive action: a cross-species translational study. PLoS One 7, e36781CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bubnik MG, Hawk LW Jr, Pelham WE Jr, Waxmonsky JG, Rosch KS (2015) Reinforcement enhances vigilance among children with ADHD: comparisons to typically developing children and to the effects of methylphenidate. J Abnorm Child Psychol 43:149–61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Burton CL, Fletcher PJ (2012) Age and sex differences in impulsive action in rats: the role of dopamine and glutamate. Behav Brain Res 230:21–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Caprioli D, Jupp B, Hong YT, Sawiak SJ, Ferrari V, Wharton L, Williamson DJ, McNabb C, Berry D, Aigbirhio FI, Robbins TW, Fryer TD, Dalley JW (2015) Dissociable rate-dependent effects of oral methylphenidate on impulsivity and D2/3 receptor availability in the striatum. J Neurosci 35:3747–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Castellanos FX, Elia J, Kruesi MJ, Marsh WL, Gulotta CS, Potter WZ, Ritchie GF, Hamburger SD, Rapoport JL (1996) Cerebrospinal fluid homovanillic acid predicts behavioral response to stimulants in 45 boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 14:125–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Charach A, Yeung E, Climans T, Lillie E (2011) Childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and future substance use disorders: comparative meta-analyses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 50:9–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chelaru MI, Yang PB, Dafny N (2012) Sex differences in the behavioral response to methylphenidate in three adolescent rat strains (WKY, SHR, SD). Behav Brain Res 226:8–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Childress AR, Ehrman RN, Wang Z, Li Y, Sciortino N, Hakun J, Jens W, Suh J, Listerud J, Marquez K, Franklin T, Langleben D, Detre J, O’Brien CP (2008) Prelude to passion: limbic activation by “unseen” drug and sexual cues. PLoS ONE 3, e1506CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole BJ, Robbins TW (1987) Amphetamine impairs the discriminative performance of rats with dorsal noradrenergic bundle lesions on a 5-choice serial reaction time task: new evidence for central dopaminergic-noradrenergic interactions. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 91:458–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Wit H (2009) Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol 14:22–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. DeVito EE, Blackwell AD, Clark L, Kent L, Dezsery AM, Turner DC, Aitken MR, Sahakian BJ (2009) Methylphenidate improves response inhibition but not reflection-impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Psychopharmacol (Berl) 202:531–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diergaarde L, Pattij T, Poortvliet I, Hogenboom F, de Vries W, Schoffelmeer AN, De Vries TJ (2008) Impulsive choice and impulsive action predict vulnerability to distinct stages of nicotine seeking in rats. Biol Psychiatry 63:301–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Doremus-Fitzwater TL, Spear LP (2011) Amphetamine-induced incentive sensitization of sign-tracking behavior in adolescent and adult female rats. Behav Neurosci 125:661–667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Eagle DM, Baunez C (2010) Is there an inhibitory-response-control system in the rat? Evidence from anatomical and pharmacological studies of behavioral inhibition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:50–72CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Economidou D, Pelloux Y, Robbins TW, Dalley JW, Everitt BJ (2009) High impulsivity predicts relapse to cocaine-seeking after punishment-induced abstinence. Biol Psychiatry 65:851–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Evenden JL (1999) Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 146:348–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fillmore MT, Rush CR (2002) Impaired inhibitory control of behavior in chronic cocaine users. Drug Alcohol Depend 66:265–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Flagel SB, Robinson TE, Clark JJ, Clinton SM, Watson SJ, Seeman P, Phillips PE, Akil H (2010) An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:388–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Flaherty CF (1982) Incentive contrast: a review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward. Anim Learn Behav 10:409–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flaherty CF, Largen J (1975) Within-subjects positive and negative contrast effects in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 88:653–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fosco WD, Hawk LW Jr, Rosch KS, Bubnik MG (2015) Evaluating cognitive and motivational accounts of greater reinforcement effects among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behav Brain Funct 11:20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Franklin T, Wang Z, Suh JJ, Hazan R, Cruz J, Li Y, Goldman M, Detre JA, O’Brien CP, Childress AR (2011) Effects of varenicline on smoking cue-triggered neural and craving responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68:516–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Gaub M, Carlson CL (1997) Gender differences in ADHD: a meta-analysis and critical review. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:1036–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Grubbs FE (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 11:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gunther T, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Konrad K (2010) Sex differences in attentional performance and their modulation by methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 20:179–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hearst E, Jenkins HM (1974) Sign-tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Monograph of the Psychonomic SocietyGoogle Scholar
  39. Kambeitz J, Romanos M, Ettinger U (2014) Meta-analysis of the association between dopamine transporter genotype and response to methylphenidate treatment in ADHD. Pharmacogenomics J 14:77–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim E, Cheon KA, Joung YS, Kim JY, Song DH (2015) The relationship between symptomatic and functional changes of Korean children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system-methylphenidate. Clin Neuropharmacol 38:30–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Leeman RF, Ralevski E, Limoncelli D, Pittman B, O’Malley SS, Petrakis IL (2014) Relationships between impulsivity and subjective response in an IV ethanol paradigm. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 231:2867–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leth-Steensen C, King Elbaz Z, Douglas VI (2000) Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. Acta Psychologica 104:167–190Google Scholar
  43. Lloyd DR, Gancarz AM, Ashrafioun L, Kausch MA, Richards JB (2012) Habituation and the reinforcing effectiveness of visual stimuli. Behav Process 91:184–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Robinson TE (2011) Rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues are also prone to impulsive action. Behav Brain Res 223:255–61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer PJ, Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Flagel SB, Morrow JD, Robinson TE (2012) Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. PLoS One 7, e38987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Milton AL, Everitt BJ (2010) The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: implications for the treatment of addiction. Eur J Neurosci 31:2308–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mott R, Talbot CJ, Turri MG, Collins AC, Flint J (2000) A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:12649–12654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Murray JE, Dilleen R, Pelloux Y, Economidou D, Dalley JW, Belin D, Everitt BJ (2013) Increased Impulsivity Retards the Transition to Dorsolateral Striatal Dopamine Control of Cocaine Seeking. Biol Psychiatry 76(1):15–22Google Scholar
  49. Navarra R, Graf R, Huang Y, Logue S, Comery T, Hughes Z, Day M (2008) Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on attention and impulsivity in the 5-choice serial reaction time test. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:34–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Oosterlaan J, Logan GD, Sergeant JA (1998) Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: a meta-analysis of studies with the stop task. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39:411–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Parker CC, Chen H, Flagel SB, Geurts AM, Richards JB, Robinson TE, Solberg Woods LC, Palmer AA (2013) Rats are the smart choice: Rationale for a renewed focus on rats in behavioral genetics. Neuropharmacology 76:250–258Google Scholar
  52. Pelham WE Jr, Walker JL, Sturges J, Hoza J (1989) Comparative effects of methylphenidate on ADD girls and ADD boys. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 28:773–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Penades R, Catalan R, Rubia K, Andres S, Salamero M, Gasto C (2007) Impaired response inhibition in obsessive compulsive disorder. Eur Psychiatry 22:404–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Perry JL, Carroll ME (2008) The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 200:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pitchers KK, Flagel SB, O’Donnell EG, Solberg Woods LC, Sarter M, Robinson TE (2015) Individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue: Influence of sex. Behav Brain Res 278:462–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Posner MI, Snyder CR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol 109:160–74Google Scholar
  57. Puumala T, Ruotsalainen S, Jakala P, Koivisto E, Riekkinen P Jr, Sirvio J (1996) Behavioral and pharmacological studies on the validation of a new animal model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurobiol Learn Mem 66:198–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Richards JB, Lloyd DR, Kuehlewind B, Militello L, Paredez M, Solberg Woods L, Palmer AA (2013) Strong genetic influences on measures of behavioral-regulation among inbred rat strains. Genes Brain Behav 12:490–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Robbins T (2002) The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology 163:362–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Robinson ES (2012) Blockade of noradrenaline re-uptake sites improves accuracy and impulse control in rats performing a five-choice serial reaction time tasks. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 219:303–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Robinson TE, Flagel SB (2009) Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol Psychiatry 65:869–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Robinson TE, Yager LM, Cogan ES, Saunders BT (2014) On the motivational properties of reward cues: individual differences. Neuropharmacology 76:450–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Robinson MJ, Anselme P, Suchomel K, Berridge KC (2015) Amphetamine-Induced Sensitization and Reward Uncertainty Similarly Enhance Incentive Salience for Conditioned Cues. Behav Neurosci 129:502–511Google Scholar
  64. Roeding RL, Perna MK, Cummins ED, Peterson DJ, Palmatier MI, Brown RW (2014) Sex differences in adolescent methylphenidate sensitization: effects on glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Behav Brain Res 273:139–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosch KS, Fosco WD, Pelham WE Jr, Waxmonsky JG, Bubnik MG, Hawk LW Jr (2016) Reinforcement and stimulant medication ameliorate deficient response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 44:309–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sabol KE, Richards JB, Broom SL, Roach JT, Hausknecht K (2003) Effects of stimulus salience and methamphetamine on choice reaction time in the rat: central tendency versus distribution skew. Behav Pharmacol 14:489–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2010) A cocaine cue acts as an incentive stimulus in some but not others: implications for addiction. Biol Psychiatry 67:730–6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Saunders BT, Yager LM, Robinson TE (2013) Cue-evoked cocaine “craving”: role of dopamine in the accumbens core. J Neurosci 33:13989–4000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Semrud-Clikeman M, Walkowiak J, Wilkinson A, Butcher B (2010) Executive functioning in children with Asperger syndrome, ADHD-combined type, ADHD-predominately inattentive type, and controls. J Autism Dev Disord 40:1017–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Sharp WS, Walter JM, Marsh WL, Ritchie GF, Hamburger SD, Castellanos FX (1999) ADHD in girls: clinical comparability of a research sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38:40–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Solberg Woods LC, Holl K, Tschannen M, Valdar W (2010a) Fine-mapping a locus for glucose tolerance using heterogeneous stock rats. Physiol Genomics 41:102–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Solberg Woods LC, Stelloh C, Regner KR, Schwabe T, Eisenhauer J, Garrett MR (2010b) Heterogeneous stock rats: a new model to study the genetics of renal phenotypes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298:F1484–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Solberg Woods LC, Holl KL, Oreper D, Xie Y, Tsaih SW, Valdar W (2012) Fine-mapping diabetes-related traits, including insulin resistance, in heterogeneous stock rats. Physiol Genomics 44:1013–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Coghill D, Markowitz JS, Swanson JM, Vandenberghe M, Hatch SJ (2007) Sex differences in the response of children with ADHD to once-daily formulations of methylphenidate. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:701–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Spencer SV, Hawk LW Jr, Richards JB, Shiels K, Pelham WE Jr, Waxmonsky JG (2009) Stimulant treatment reduces lapses in attention among children with ADHD: the effects of methylphenidate on intra-individual response time distributions. J Abnorm Child Psychol 37:805–16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Stein MA, Waldman I, Newcorn J, Bishop J, Kittles R, Cook EH Jr (2014) Dopamine transporter genotype and stimulant dose–response in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 24:238–44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Strand MT, Hawk LW Jr, Bubnik M, Shiels K, Pelham WE Jr, Waxmonsky JG (2012) Improving working memory in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the separate and combined effects of incentives and stimulant medication. J Abnorm Child Psychol 40:1193–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Tavares H, Gentil V (2007) Pathological gambling and obsessive-compulsive disorder: towards a spectrum of disorders of volition. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 29:107–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Tomie A, Lincks M, Nadarajah SD, Pohorecky LA, Yu L (2012) Pairings of lever and food induce Pavlovian conditioned approach of sign-tracking and goal-tracking in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res 226:571–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Torres-Reveron A, Dow-Edwards DL (2005) Repeated administration of methylphenidate in young, adolescent, and mature rats affects the response to cocaine later in adulthood. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 181:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Gaalen MM, Brueggeman RJ, Bronius PF, Schoffelmeer AN, Vanderschuren LJ (2006) Behavioral disinhibition requires dopamine receptor activation. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 187:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weafer J, de Wit H (2013) Inattention, impulsive action, and subjective response to d-amphetamine. Drug Alcohol Depend 133:127–133Google Scholar
  83. Williamson D, Johnston C (2015) Gender differences in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a narrative review. Clin Psychol Rev 40:15–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yager LM, Robinson TE (2010) Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues. Behav Brain Res 214:30–4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhuang X, Oosting RS, Jones SR, Gainetdinov RR, Miller GW, Caron MG, Hen R (2001) Hyperactivity and impaired response habituation in hyperdopaminergic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:1982–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher P. King
    • 1
  • Abraham A. Palmer
    • 2
  • Leah C. Solberg Woods
    • 3
  • Larry W. Hawk
    • 1
  • Jerry B. Richards
    • 4
  • Paul J. Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Pediatrics, Human and Molecular GeneticsCenter Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.Research Institute on AddictionsBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations