Psychopharmacology

, Volume 233, Issue 3, pp 393–404 | Cite as

Choosing voluntary exercise over sucrose consumption depends upon dopamine transmission: effects of haloperidol in wild type and adenosine A2AKO mice

  • Mercè Correa
  • Marta Pardo
  • Pilar Bayarri
  • Laura López-Cruz
  • Noemí San Miguel
  • Olga Valverde
  • Catherine Ledent
  • John D. Salamone
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) regulates behavioral activation and effort-related decision-making in motivated behaviors. Mesolimbic DA D2 receptors are co-localized with adenosine A2A receptors, and they interact in an antagonistic manner.

Objectives

A T-maze task was developed to assess dopaminergic involvement in preference between a reinforcer that involves vigorous voluntary activity (running wheel) and a reinforcer that requires minimal behavioral activation (sucrose pellets). Haloperidol (D2 antagonist) was administered to adenosine A2A receptor knockout (A2AKO) and wild-type (WT) littermate controls to assess the involvement of these two receptors in the selection of running wheel activity versus sucrose consumption.

Results

Under control conditions, mice spent more time running and less time eating. In WT mice, haloperidol reduced time running but actually increased time-consuming sucrose. However, A2AKO mice did not show the haloperidol-induced shift from running wheel activity to sucrose intake. Prefeeding reduced sucrose consumption in the T-maze in both strains, indicating that this paradigm is sensitive to motivational devaluation. Haloperidol increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACg) and nucleus accumbens (Acb) core of WT but not KO mice.

Conclusions

These results indicate that after DA antagonism, the preference for vigorous physical activity is reduced, while palatable food selection increases. Adenosine A2A receptor deletion provides resistance to these effects of D2 receptor antagonism. These two receptors in Acb core and ACg seem to be involved in the regulation of the intrinsic reinforcing characteristics of voluntary exercise but not in the regulation of the primary reinforcing characteristics of palatable sedentary reinforcers.

Keywords

Accumbens Reward Cingulate Running wheel Sucrose 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant to Mercè Correa from Pla Promoció Investigació UJI (P1.1 A 2013-01), to John D. Salamone from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH078023), and to Olga Valverde from Ministery of Economy, Spain (SAF-2013-41761-R). Personal grants were awarded to Marta Pardo (Predoc-UJI/ 2007/43), Noemí San Miguel (Predoc-UJI/2012/28), and Laura Lopez-Cruz (FPU AP2010-3793, Ministerio de Educación, Spain).

References

  1. Aberman JE, Salamone JD (1999) Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make rats more sensitive to high ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement. Neuroscience 92:545–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakshi VP, Kelley AE (1991) Dopaminergic regulation of feeding behavior: I. differential effects of haloperidol microinjection in three striatal subregions. Psychobiology 19:223–232Google Scholar
  3. Baldo BA, Sadeghian K, Basso AM, Kelley AE (2002) Effects of selective dopamine D1 or D2 receptor blockade within nucleus accumbens subregions on ingestive behavior and associated motor activity. Behav Brain Res 137:165–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum WM, Rachlin HC (1969) Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav 12:861–874PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beeler JA, Frazier CR, Zhuang X (2012) Putting desire on a budget: dopamine and energy expenditure, reconciling reward and resources. Front Integr Neurosci 6:49PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belke TW, Pierce WD (2014) Effect of sucrose availability and pre-running on the intrinsic value of wheel running as an operant and a reinforcing consequence. Behav Process 103:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belke TW, Wagner JP (2005) The reinforcing property and the rewarding aftereffect of wheel running in rats: a combination of two paradigms. Behav Process 68(2):165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belke TW, Oldford AC, Forgie MY, Beye JA (2005) Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of D-amphetamine. Behav Pharmacol 16:219–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berchicci M, Menotti F, Macaluso A, Di Russo F (2013) The neurophysiology of central and peripheral fatigue during sub-maximal lower limb isometric contractions. Front Hum Neurosci 7:135PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berridge KC (2000) Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:173–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cagniard B, Balsam PD, Brunner D, Zhuang X (2006) Mice with chronically elevated dopamine exhibit enhanced motivation, but not learning, for a food reward. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:1362–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cosgrove KP, Hunter RG, Carroll ME (2002) Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73:663–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishman RK, Berthoud HR, Booth FW, Cotman CW, Edgerton R, Fleshner MR, Gandevia SC, Gomez-Pinilla F, Greenwood BN, Hillman CH, Kramer AF, Levin BE, Moran TH, Russo-Neustadt AA, Salamone JD, Van Hoomissen JD, Wade CE, York DA, Zigmond MJ (2006) Neurobiology of exercise. Obesity 14:345–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El Yacoubi M, Ledent C, Parmentier M, Costentin J, Vaugeois JM (2001) Adenosine A2A receptor knockout mice are partially protected against drug-induced catalepsy. Neuroreport 12:983–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrar AM, Segovia KN, Randall PA, Nunes EJ, Collins LE, Stopper CM, Port RG, Hockemeyer J, Müller CE, Correa M, Salamone JD (2010) Nucleus accumbens and effort-related functions: behavioral and neural markers of the interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. Neuroscience 166:1056–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferré S, Ciruela F, Canals M, Marcellino D, Burgueno J, Casadó V, Hillion J, Torvinen M, Fanelli F, Benedetti PD, Goldberg SR, Bouvier M, Fuxe K, Agnati LF, Lluis C, Franco R, Woods A (2004) Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor-receptor heteromers. Targets for neuro-psychiatric disorders. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 10:265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Floresco SB (2015) The nucleus accumbens: an interface between cognition, emotion, and action. Annu Rev Psychol 66:25–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Floresco SB, St Onge JR, Ghods-Sharifi S, Winstanley CA (2008a) Cortico-limbic-striatal circuits subserving different forms of cost-benefit decision-making. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 8:375–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Floresco SB, Tse MT, Ghods-Sharifi S (2008b) Dopaminergic and glutamatergic regulation of effort- and delay-based decision making. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1966–1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman JH (2009) Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease patients. Curr Treat Options Neurol 11:186–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghods-Sharifi S, Floresco SB (2010) Differential effects on effort discounting induced by inactivations of the nucleus accumbens core or shell. Behav Neurosci 124:179–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hauber W, Sommer S (2009) Prefrontostriatal circuitry regulates effort-related decision making. Cereb Cortex 19:2240–2247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hosking JG, Floresco SB, Winstanley CA (2015) Dopamine antagonism decreases willingness to expend physical, but not cognitive, effort: a comparison of two rodent cost/benefit decision-making tasks. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1005–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ikemoto S, Panksepp J (1996) Dissociations between appetitive and consummatory responses by pharmacological manipulations of reward-relevant brain regions. Behav Neurosci 110:331–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  26. Lambert KG (2006) Rising rates of depression in today’s society: consideration of the roles of effort based rewards and enhanced resilience in day-to-day functioning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:497–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ledent C, Vaugeois JM, Schiffmann SN, Pedrazzini T, El Yacoubi M, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Costentin J, Heath JK, Vassart G, Parmentier M (1997) Aggressiveness, hypoalgesia and high blood pressure in mice lacking the adenosine A2a receptor. Nature 388:674–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lett BT, Grant VL, Byrne MJ, Koh MT (2000) Pairings of a distinctive chamber with the aftereffect of wheel running produce conditioned place preference. Appetite 34:87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine AS, Kotz CM, Gosnell BA (2003) Sugars: hedonic aspects, neuroregulation, and energy balance. Am J Clin Nutr 78:834S–842SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mai B, Sommer S, Hauber W (2012) Motivational states influence effort-based decision making in rats: the role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 12:74–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McMillan DE, McClure GY, Hardwick WC (1995) Effects of access to a running wheel on food, water and ethanol intake in rats bred to accept ethanol. Drug Alcohol Depend 40:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mueller DT, Loft A, Eikelboom R (1997) Alternate-day wheel access: effects on feeding, body weight, and running. Physiol Behav 62:905–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nunes EJ, Randall PA, Hart EE, Freeland C, Yohn S, Baqi Y, Müller CE, Lopez-Cruz L, Correa M, Salamone JD (2013) Effort-related motivational effects of the VMAT-2 inhibitor tetrabenazine: implications for animal models of the motivational symptoms of depression. J Neurosci 33:19120–19130PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pardo M, Lopez-Cruz L, Valverde O, Ledent C, Baqi Y, Müller CE, Salamone JD, Correa M (2012) Adenosine A2A receptor antagonism and genetic deletion attenuate the effects of dopamine D2 antagonism on effort-based decision making in mice. Neuropharmacology 62:2068–2077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pardo M, Lopez-Cruz L, Valverde O, Ledent C, Baqi Y, Müller CE, Salamone JD, Correa M (2013) Effect of subtype-selective adenosine receptor antagonists on basal or haloperidol-regulated striatal function: studies of exploratory locomotion and c-Fos immunoreactivity in outbred and A2AR KO mice. Behav Brain Res 247:217–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pardo M, Lopez-Cruz L, San Miguel N, Salamone JD, Correa M (2015) Selection of sucrose concentration depends on the effort required to obtain it: studies using tetrabenazine, D1, D2 and D3 receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology 232:2377–2391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peciña S, Cagniard B, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW, Zhuang X (2003) Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher “wanting” but not “liking” for sweet rewards. J Neurosci 23:9395–9402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira M, Farrar AM, Hockemeyer J, Müller CE, Salamone JD, Morrell JI (2011) Effect of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist MSX-3 on motivational disruptions of maternal behavior induced by dopamine antagonism in the early postpartum rat. Psychopharmacology 213:69–79PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pierce WD, Epling WF, Boer DP (1986) Deprivation and satiation: the interrelations between food and wheel running. J Exp Anal Behav 46:199–210PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinna A, Wardas J, Cozzolino A, Morelli M (1999) Involvement of adenosine A2A receptors in the induction of c-fos expression by clozapine and haloperidol. Neuropsychopharmacology 20:44–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Premack D, Premack AJ (1963) Increased eating in rats deprived of running. J Exp Anal Behav 6:209–212PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Randall PA, Pardo M, Nunes EJ, López-Cruz L, Vemuri VK, Makriyannis A, Baqi Y, Müller CE, Correa M, Salamone JD (2012) Dopaminergic modulation of effort-related choice behavior as assessed by a progressive ratio chow feeding choice task: pharmacological studies and the role of individual differences. PLoS One 7:e47934PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2007) A role for mesencephalic dopamine in activation: commentary on Berridge (2006). Psychopharmacology 191:433–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Routtenberg A (1968) “Self-starvation” of rats living in activity wheels: adaptation effects. J Comp Physiol Psychol 66:234–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salamone JD (1988) Dopaminergic involvement in activational aspects of motivation: effects of haloperidol on schedule induced activity, feeding and foraging in rats. Psychobiology 16:196–206Google Scholar
  46. Salamone JD, Correa M (2002) Motivational views of reinforcement: implications for understanding the behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine. Behav Brain Res 137:3–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salamone JD, Correa M (2009) Dopamine/adenosine interactions involved in effort-related aspects of food motivation. Appetite 53:422–425PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salamone JD, Correa M (2012) The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron 76:470–485PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salamone JD, Zigmond MJ, Stricker EM (1990) Characterization of the impaired feeding behavior in rats given haloperidol or dopamine depleting brain lesions. Neuroscience 39(17):24Google Scholar
  50. Salamone JD, Steinpreis RE, McCullough LD, Smith P, Grebel D, Mahan K (1991) Haloperidol and nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion suppress lever pressing for food but increase free food consumption in a novel food choice procedure. Psychopharmacology 104:515–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salamone JD, Mahan K, Rogers S (1993) Ventrolateral striatal dopamine depletions impair feeding and food handling in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44:605–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salamone JD, Cousins MS, Bucher S (1994) Anhedonia or anergia? effects of haloperidol and nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion on instrumental response selection in a T-maze cost/benefit procedure. Behav Brain Res 65:221–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salamone JD, Correa M, Nunes EJ, Randall PA, Pardo M (2012) The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond. J Exp Anal Behav 97:125–146PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Santerre JL, Nunes EJ, Kovner R, Leser CE, Randall PA, Collins-Praino LE, Lopez-Cruz L, Correa M, Baqi Y, Müller CE, Salamone JD (2012) The novel adenosine A(2A) antagonist prodrug MSX-4 is effective in animal models related to motivational and motor functions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 102:477–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schweimer J, Saft S, Hauber W (2005) Involvement of catecholamine neurotransmission in the rat anterior cingulate in effort-related decision making. Behav Neurosci 119:1687–1692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sherwin CM (1998) Voluntary wheel running: a review and novel interpretation. Anim Behav 56:11–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith MA, Schmidt KT, Iordanou JC, Mustroph ML (2008) Aerobic exercise decreases the positive reinforcing effects of cocaine. Drug Alc Depend 988:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Treadway MT, Buckholtz JW, Cowan RL, Woodward ND, Li R, Ansari MS, Baldwin RM, Schwartzman AN, Kessler RM, Zald DH (2012) Dopaminergic mechanisms of individual differences in human effort-based decision-making. J Neurosci 32:6170–6176PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mercè Correa
    • 1
  • Marta Pardo
    • 1
  • Pilar Bayarri
    • 1
  • Laura López-Cruz
    • 1
  • Noemí San Miguel
    • 1
  • Olga Valverde
    • 2
  • Catherine Ledent
    • 3
  • John D. Salamone
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychobiologyUniversitat Jaume ICastellóSpain
  2. 2.Department of Experimental and Health SciencesUniversitat Pompeu Fabra and IMIM-Hospital del Mar Research InstituteBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et MoléculaireUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, IRIBHMBruxellesBelgium
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations