Amphetamine self-administration and dopamine function: assessment of gene × environment interactions in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats
Previous research suggests both genetic and environmental influences on substance abuse vulnerability.
The current work sought to investigate the interaction of genes and environment on the acquisition of amphetamine self-administration as well as amphetamine-stimulated dopamine (DA) release in nucleus accumbens shell using in vivo microdialysis.
Inbred Lewis (LEW) and Fischer (F344) rat strains were raised in either an enriched condition (EC), social condition (SC), or isolated condition (IC). Acquisition of amphetamine self-administration (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) was determined across an incrementing daily fixed ratio (FR) schedule. In a separate cohort of rats, extracellular DA and the metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were measured in the nucleus accumbens shell following an acute amphetamine injection (1 mg/kg).
“Addiction-prone” LEW rats had greater acquisition of amphetamine self-administration on a FR1 schedule compared to “addiction-resistant” F344 rats when raised in the SC environment. These genetic differences were negated in both the EC and IC environments, with enrichment buffering against self-administration and isolation enhancing self-administration in both strains. On a FR5 schedule, the isolation-induced increase in amphetamine self-administration was greater in F344 than LEW rats. While no group differences were obtained in extracellular DA, gene × environment differences were obtained in extracellular levels of the metabolite DOPAC. In IC rats only, LEW rats showed attenuation in the amphetamine-induced decrease in DOPAC compared to F344 rats. IC LEW rats also had an attenuated DOPAC response to amphetamine compared to EC LEW rats.
The current results demonstrate gene × environment interactions in amphetamine self-administration and amphetamine-induced changes in extracellular DOPAC in nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell. However, the behavioral and neurochemical differences were not related directly, indicating that mechanisms independent of DA metabolism in NAc shell likely mediate the gene × environment effects in amphetamine self-administration.
KeywordsGene × environment interactions Self-administration Microdialysis Amphetamine Environmental enrichment Inbred rat strains Lewis Fischer 344 Dopamine
- Bardo MT, Valone JM, Robinet PM, Shaw WB, Dwoskin LP (1999) Environmental enrichment enhances the stimulant effect of intravenous amphetamine: search for a cellular mechanism in the nucleus accumbens. Psychobiology 27:292–299Google Scholar
- Carroll ME, Lac ST (1993) Autoshaping i.v. cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 110:5–12Google Scholar
- Cooper JR, Bloom FE, Roth RH (2003) The biochemical basis of neuropharmacology, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Green TA, Alibhai IN, Roybal CN, Winstanley CA, Theobald DEH, Birnbaum SG et al (2010) Environmental enrichment produces a behavioral phenotype mediated by low cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding (CREB) activity in nucleus accumbens. Biol Psychiatry 67:28–35PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopfer CJ, Crowley TJ, Hewitt JK (2003) Review of twin and adoption studies of adolescent substance use. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:710–719Google Scholar
- Lecca D, Valentini V, Cacciapaglia F, Acquas E, Di Chiara G (2007b) Reciprocal effects of response contingent and noncontingent intravenous heroin on in vivo nucleus accumbens shell versus core dopamine in the rat: a repeated sampling microdialysis study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 194:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miserendino MJ, Haile CN, Kosten TA (2003) Strain differences in response to escapable and inescapable novel environments and their ability to predict amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 167:281–290Google Scholar
- Paxinos G, Watson C (2007) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 6th edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Shoblock JR, Sullivan EB, Maisonneuve IM, Glick SD (2003) Neurochemical and behavioral differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 165:359–369Google Scholar