, Volume 231, Issue 23, pp 4443–4453 | Cite as

Compromised frontocerebellar circuitry contributes to nonplanning impulsivity in recovering alcoholics

  • Young-Chul Jung
  • Tilman Schulte
  • Eva M. Müller-Oehring
  • Kee Namkoong
  • Adolf Pfefferbaum
  • Edith V. Sullivan
Original Investigation



Degradation of frontocerebellar circuitry is a principal neural mechanism of alcoholism-related executive dysfunctions affecting impulse control and cognitive planning.


We tested the hypothesis that alcoholic patients would demonstrate compromised dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) –cerebellar functional connectivity when adjusting their strategies to accommodate uncertain conditions and would recruit compensatory brain regions to overcome ineffective response patterns.


Twenty-six alcoholics and 26 healthy participants underwent functional MRI in two sequential runs while performing a decision-making task. The first run required a response regardless of level of ambiguity of the stimuli; the second run allowed a PASS option (i.e., no response choice), which was useful on ambiguous trials.


Healthy controls demonstrated strong synchronous activity between the dACC and cerebellum while planning and executing a behavioral strategy. By contrast, alcoholics showed synchronous activity between the dACC and the premotor cortex, perhaps enabling successful compensation for accuracy and reaction time in certain conditions; however, a negative outcome of this strategy was rigidity in modifying response strategy to accommodate uncertain conditions. Compared with the alcoholic group, the control group had lower nonplanning impulsiveness, which correlated with using the option PASS to respond in uncertain conditions.


These findings suggest that compromised dACC–cerebellar functional circuitry contributes to recruitment of an alternative network—dACC–premotor cortex— to perform well under low-risk, unambiguous conditions. This compensatory network, however, was inadequate to enable the alcoholics to avert making poor choices in planning and executing an effective behavioral strategy in high-risk, uncertain conditions.


Alcoholism Nonplanning impulsivity Anterior cingulate cortex Cerebellum 



The authors would like to thank William Hawkes for data collection and analysis. This research was supported by NIH grants AA010723, AA012388, AA017168, and AA017923.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

213_2014_3594_MOESM1_ESM.bmp (2.6 mb)
ESM 1 (BMP 2686 kb)
213_2014_3594_MOESM2_ESM.bmp (1.8 mb)
ESM 2 (BMP 1829 kb)


  1. Bogg T, Fukunaga R, Finn PR, Brown JW (2012) Cognitive control links alcohol use, trait disinhibition, and reduced cognitive capacity: evidence for medial prefrontal cortex dysregulation during reward-seeking behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend 122(1–2):112–118PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chanraud S, Pitel AL, Müller-Oehring EM, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2013) Remapping the brain to compensate for impairment in recovering alcoholics. Cereb Cortex 23(1):97–104PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen AC, Porjesz B, Rangaswamy M, Kamarajan C, Tang Y, Jones KA, Chorlian DB, Stimus AT, Begleiter H (2007) Reduced frontal lobe activity in subjects with high impulsivity and alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31(1):156–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunha PJ, Nicastri S, de Andrade AG, Bolla KI (2010) The frontal assessment battery (FAB) reveals neurocognitive dysfunction in substance-dependent individuals in distinct executive domains: abstract reasoning, motor programming, and cognitive flexibility. Addict Behav 35(10):875–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Rosa E, Sullivan EV (2003) Enhanced release from proactive interference in nonamnesic alcoholic individuals: implications for impaired associative binding. Neuropsychology 17(3):469–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vito EE, Meda SA, Jiantonio R, Potenza MN, Krystal JH, Pearlson GD (2013) Neural correlates of impulsivity in healthy males and females with family histories of alcoholism. Neuropsychopharmacology 38(10):1854–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dosenbach NU, Fair DA, Miezin FM, Cohen AL, Wenger KK, Dosenbach RA, Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2007) Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(26):11073–11078PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, National Institute of Mental Health (1997) User’s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders: SCID-I clinician version. American Psychiatric, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SC, Frackowiak RS, Turner R (1995) Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 2(1):45–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glover S, Wall MB, Smith AT (2012) Distinct cortical networks support the planning and online control of reaching-to-grasp in humans. Eur J Neurosci 35(6):909–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Habas C, Kamdar N, Nguyen D, Prater K, Beckmann CF, Menon V, Greicius MD (2009) Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J Neurosci 29(26):8586–8594PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harding IH, Solowij N, Harrison BJ, Takagi M, Lorenzetti V, Lubman DI, Seal ML, Pantelis C, Yücel M (2012) Functional connectivity in brain networks underlying cognitive control in chronic cannabis users. Neuropsychopharmacology 37(8):1923–1933PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Irimia C, Wiskerke J, Natividad LA, Polis IY, de Vries TJ, Pattij T, Parsons LH (2013) Increased impulsivity in rats as a result of repeated cycles of alcohol intoxication and abstinence. Addict Biol. doi: 10.1111/adb.12119 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung YC, Ku J, Namkoong K, Lee W, Kim SI, Kim JJ (2010) Human orbitofrontal-striatum functional connectivity modulates behavioral persistence. Neuroreport 21(7):502–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jung YC, Schulte T, Müller-Oehring EM, Hawkes W, Namkoong K, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2014) Synchrony of anterior cingulate cortex and insular–striatal activation predicts ambiguity aversion in individuals with low impulsivity. Cereb Cortex. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht008 Google Scholar
  16. Kam JW, Dominelli R, Carlson SR (2012) Differential relationships between sub-traits of BIS-11 impulsivity and executive processes: an ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol 85(2):174–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamarajan C, Rangaswamy M, Tang Y, Chorlian DB, Pandey AK, Roopesh BN, Manz N, Saunders R, Stimus AT, Porjesz B (2010) Dysfunctional reward processing in male alcoholics: an ERP study during a gambling task. J Psychiatr Res 44(9):576–590PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim DH, Adalsteinsson E, Glover GH, Spielman DM (2002) Regularized higher-order in vivo shimming. Magn Reson Med 48(4):715–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krienen FM, Buckner RL (2009) Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 19(10):2485–2497PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee S, Lee E, Ku J, Yoon K, Namkoong K, Jung YC (2013) Disruption of orbitofronto-stiatal functional connectivity underlies maladaptive persistent behaviors in alcohol-dependent patients. Psychiatr Investig 10(3):266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Makris N, Oscar-Berman M, Jaffin SK, Hodge SM, Kennedy DN, Caviness VS, Marinkovic K, Breiter HC, Gasic GP, Harris GJ (2008) Decreased volume of the brain reward system in alcoholism. Biol Psychiatry 64(3):192–202PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moeller FG, Steinberg JL, Lane SD, Buzby M, Swann AC, Hasan KM, Kramer LA, Naravana RA (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging in MDMA users and controls: association with decision making. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 33(6):777–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moselhy HF, Georgiou G, Kahn A (2001) Frontal lobe changes in alcoholism: a review of the literature. Alcohol Alcohol 36(5):357–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oscar-Berman M, Marinković K (2007) Alcohol: effects on neurobehavioral functions and the brain. Neuropsychol Rev 17(3):239–257PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 51(6):768–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfeuffer J, Van de Moortele PF, Ugurbil K, Hu X, Glover GH (2002) Correction of physiologically induced global off-resonance effects in dynamic echo-planar and spiral functional imaging. Magn Reson Med 47(2):344–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitel AL, Zahr NM, Jackson K, Sassoon SA, Rosenbloom MJ, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2011) Signs of preclinical Wernicke’s encephalopathy and thiamine levels as predictors of neuropsychological deficits in alcoholism without Korsakoff’s syndrome. Neuropsychopharmacology 36(3):580–588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, Nieuwenhuis S (2004) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306(5695):443–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption II. Addiction 88(12):791–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saunders B, Farag N, Vincent AS, Collins FL Jr, Sorocco KH, Lovallo WR (2008) Impulsive errors on a Go–NoGo reaction time task: disinhibitory traits in relation to a family history of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32(5):888–894PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schulte T, Müller-Oehring EM, Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A (2012) Synchrony of corticostriatal-midbrain activation enables normal inhibitory control and conflict processing in recovering alcoholic men. Biol Psychiatry 71(3):269–278PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skinner HA (1982) Development and validation of a lifetime alcohol consumption assessment procedure. Addiction Research Foundation, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Sullivan EV (2003) Compromised pontocerebellar and cerebellothalamocortical systems: speculations on their contributions to cognitive and motor impairment in nonamnesic alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27(9):1409–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A (2005) Neurocircuitry in alcoholism: a substrate of disruption and repair. Psychopharmacology 180(4):583–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sullivan EV, Harding AJ, Pentney R, Dlugos C, Martin PR, Parks MH, Desmond JE, Chen SH, Pryor MR, De Rosa E, Pfefferbaum A (2003) Disruption of frontocerebellar circuitry and function in alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27(2):301–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sullivan EV, Harris RA, Pfefferbaum A (2010) Alcohol’s effects on brain and behavior. Alcohol Res Health 33(1):127–143PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. van Noordt SJ, Segalowitz SJ (2012) Performance monitoring and the medial prefrontal cortex: a review of individual differences and context effects as a window on self-regulation. Front Hum Neurosci 6:197PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Venkatraman V, Rosati AG, Taren AA, Huettel SA (2009) Resolving response, decision, and strategic control: evidence for a functional topography in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29(42):13158–13164PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walton ME, Devlin JT, Rushworth MF (2004) Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7(11):1259–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wechsler D (2001) Wechsler test of adult reading. Pearson Education, San AntonioGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Young-Chul Jung
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Tilman Schulte
    • 3
  • Eva M. Müller-Oehring
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kee Namkoong
    • 1
    • 4
  • Adolf Pfefferbaum
    • 2
    • 3
  • Edith V. Sullivan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Neuroscience ProgramSRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Behavioral Science in MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations