Effects of acute alcohol tolerance on perceptions of danger and willingness to drive after drinking
- 753 Downloads
Drinking and driving is associated with elevated rates of motor vehicle accidents and fatalities. Previous research suggests that alcohol impairs judgments about the dangers of risky behaviors; however, how alcohol affects driving-related judgments is less clear. Impairments have also been shown to differ across limbs of the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) curve, which is known as acute tolerance.
The objectives of this study were to examine whether perceptions about the dangerousness of driving after drinking and willingness to drive differed across the ascending and descending limbs of the BAC curve and to test whether reductions in perceived danger were associated with willingness to drive on the descending limb.
Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to receive either a moderate dose of alcohol (peak BAC = 0.10 g%) or placebo. We assessed perceived dangerousness and willingness to drive at matched BACs (~0.067–0.068 g%) on the ascending and descending limbs.
Both perceived danger and willingness to drive showed acute tolerance in the alcohol group. Participants judged driving to be significantly less dangerous and were more willing to drive on the descending limb compared to the ascending limb. The magnitude of change in perceived danger significantly predicted willingness to drive on the descending limb.
Decreased impairment associated with acute tolerance may lead individuals to underestimate the dangerousness of driving after drinking and in turn make poor decisions regarding driving. This study further emphasizes the descending limb as a period of increased risk and offers support for enhancing prevention efforts by targeting drivers at declining BAC levels.
KeywordsDrinking and driving Perceived danger Alcohol administration Acute tolerance Descending limb
This research was supported by grants (R01 AA019546, T32 AA013526) from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The authors thank Dr. Chia-Lin Tsai for contributions to data analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest in conducting this research. This study complies with the laws of the United States of America.
- Fromme K, D’Amico EJ, Katz EC (1999) Intoxicated sexual risk taking: an expectancy or cognitive impairment explanation? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 60:54–63Google Scholar
- Goldman MS, Del Boca FK, Darkes J (1999) Alcohol expectancy theory: the application of cognitive neuroscience. In: Leonard KE, Blane HT (eds) Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism. Guilford, New York, pp 203–245Google Scholar
- Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE (2011) Monitoring the future. National results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings, 2010. National Insttute on Drug Abuse, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
- Maisto SA, Carey MP, Carey KB, Gordon CM (2002) The effects of alcohol and expectancies on risk perception and behavioral skills televant to safer sex among heterosexual young adult women. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 63:476–485Google Scholar
- NHTSA (2012) Traffic safety facts 2011: alcohol-impaired driving, DOT HS 811 700. NHTSA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- NIAAA (2005) National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism—recommended council guidelines on ethyl alcohol administration in human experimentation. NIAAA, Bethedsa, MDGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham HeightsGoogle Scholar
- Yi H, Chen CM, Williams GD (2006) Trends in alcohol-related fatal traffic crashes, United States, 1982–2004. NIAAA, Bethedsa, MDGoogle Scholar