A critical analysis of alcohol hangover research methodology for surveys or studies of effects on cognition
- 1.3k Downloads
Alcohol hangover may be defined as an adverse effect of heavy alcohol consumption present after sufficient time has elapsed for the alcohol to have been eliminated from the blood. Understanding how hangover may impair performance is important for public safety; yet, there is relatively little hangover research. This paper outlines good practice for future studies.
This paper presents a critical analysis of hangover methodology for surveys or studies of effects on cognition with human subjects and provides suggestions for optimum research practice for laboratory-based and naturalistic alcohol hangover studies.
Four hangover symptom scales have been developed and subjected to psychometric testing. For retrospective assessment, we recommend the Hangover Symptoms Scale (HSS) or the Alcohol Hangover Severity Scale (AHSS). For concurrent assessment of hangover symptoms, we recommend either the Acute Hangover Scale (AHS), the five-item version of the HSS, or the AHSS. In research aiming to assess the cognitive effects of alcohol hangover, we suggest focusing on the cognitive domains of attention, memory and executive function, and we specify a number of tests within these cognitive domains that are likely to be sensitive to any decrements due to hangover. Finally, we argue that naturalistic studies should assess biological markers to improve the accuracy of estimates of alcohol consumption. Specifically, we recommend the assessment of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) for this purpose.
Recommendations are made with respect to assessing hangover symptoms, cognitive effects of hangover and biological markers of alcohol consumption.
KeywordsReview Alcohol hangover Symptoms Cognitive performance Biological markers Ethyl glucuronide
This research was supported by EU 7th Framework Marie Curie Research Fellowship Project No: 301424.
- Anderson S, Dawson J (1999) Neuropsychological correlates of alcoholic hangover. S Afr J Sci 95:145–147Google Scholar
- Baker EL, Letz RE, Fidler AT, Stuart S, Plantamura D, Lyndon M (1985) A computer-based neurobehavioral evaluation system for occupational and environmental pidemiology: methodology and validation studies. Neurotoxicol Teratol 7:369–377Google Scholar
- Finnigan F, Hammersley R (1992) The effects of alcohol on performance. In: Smith AP, Jones DM (eds) Handbook of human performance. Academic, London, pp 73–126Google Scholar
- Grange JA, Houghton G (in press) Task switching and cognitive control New York NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Laurell H, Törnros J (1983) Investigation of alcoholic hangover effects on driving performance. Blutalkohol 20:489–499Google Scholar
- McKinney A, Coyle K (2007) Next-day effects of alcohol and an additional stressor on memory and psychomotor performance. J Stud Alcohol 68:446–454Google Scholar
- Norman DA, Shallice T (1986) Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D (eds) Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory vol 4. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Perry RJ, Hodges JR (1999) Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Crit Rev Brain 122:383–404Google Scholar
- Piasecki TM, Slutske WS, Wood PK, Hunt-Carter EE (2010) Frequency and correlates of diary-measured hangoverlike experiences in a college sample. Psychol Addict Behav 24:163–169Google Scholar
- Rutherford A, Markopoulos G, Bruno D, Brady-Van-den-Bos M (2012) Long-term memory: encoding to retrieval. In: Braisby N, Gellatly A (eds) Cognitive psychology . Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Schacter DL (1987) Implicit memory: history and current status. J Exp Psychol 3:501–518Google Scholar
- Turgay A, Binder C, Snyder R, Fisman S (2003) Long-term safety and efficacy of risperidone for the treatment of disruptive behavior disorders in children with subaverage IQs. Pediatrics 110:97–109Google Scholar