A comparison of cannabidiolic acid with other treatments for anticipatory nausea using a rat model of contextually elicited conditioned gaping
- First Online:
- 310 Downloads
The effectiveness of cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) was compared with other potential treatments for anticipatory nausea (AN), using a rat model of contextually elicited conditioned gaping reactions.
The potential of ondansetron (OND), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), chlordiazepoxide (CDP), CBDA, and co-administration of CBDA and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) to reduce AN and modify locomotor activity was evaluated.
Materials and methods
Following four pairings of a novel context with lithium chloride (LiCl), the rats were given a test for AN. On the test trial, they received pretreatment injections of the following: vehicle, OND (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg), THC (0.5 mg/kg), CBDA (0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg), CDP (1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) or co-administration of subthreshold doses of CBDA (0.1 μg/kg), and THCA (5 μg/kg). Immediately following the AN test trial in all experiments, rats were given a 15 min locomotor activity test. Finally, the potential of CBDA (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/kg) to attenuate conditioned freezing to a shock-paired tone was assessed.
THC, CBDA, and CDP, but not OND, reduced contextually elicited gaping reactions. Co-administration of subthreshold doses of CBDA and THCA also suppressed AN, and this effect was blocked by pretreatment with either a cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) receptor antagonist or a 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT1A) receptor antagonist. CDP (but not CBDA, THC or CBDA and THCA) also suppressed locomotor activity at effective doses. CBDA did not modify the expression of conditioned fear.
CBDA has therapeutic potential as a highly potent and selective treatment for AN without psychoactive or locomotor effects.
KeywordsCannabidiolic acid Ondansetron Chlordiazepoxide Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid Conditioned fear Nausea Anticipatory nausea Activity
- Fegley D, Gaetani S, Duranti A, Tontini A, Mor M, Tarzia G et al (2005) Characterization of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3′-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB597): effects on anandamide and oleoylethanolamide deactivation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 313:352–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kamen C, Tejani MA, Chandwani K, Janelsins M, Peoples AR, Roscoe JA et al (2014) Anticipatory nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy. Eur J Pharmacol 722:172–179Google Scholar
- Limebeer CL, Parker LA (2000) The anti-emetic drug, ondansetron, interferes with lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions, but not lithium-induced conditioned taste avoidance. J Exp Psych: Animal Behav Proc 26:371–384Google Scholar
- Limebeer CL, Parker LA (2003) The 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT dose-dependently interferes with the establishment and the expression of lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 166:120–126Google Scholar
- Parker LA, Kwiatkowska M, Mechoulam R (2006) Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, but not ondansetron, interfere with conditioned retching reactions elicited by a lithium-paired context in Suncus murinus: an animal model of anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Physiol Behav 87:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, De Brier F, Van Heer C, Kaufman L et al (1993) Prevention of adjustment disorders and anticipatory nausea secondary to adjuvant chemotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the usefulness of alprazolam. J Clin Oncol 11:1384–1390PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rock EM, Bolognini D, Limebeer C, Cascio M, Anavi-Goffer S, Fletcher P et al (2012) Cannabidiol, a non-psychotropic component of cannabis, attenuates vomiting and nausea-like behaviour via indirect agonism of 5-HT(1A) somatodendritic autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Br J Pharmacol 165:2620–2634PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar