, Volume 231, Issue 15, pp 2999–3008 | Cite as

Effects of alcohol hangover on simulated highway driving performance

  • Joris C. VersterEmail author
  • Adriana C. Bervoets
  • Suzanne de Klerk
  • Rick A. Vreman
  • Berend Olivier
  • Thomas Roth
  • Karel A. Brookhuis
Original Investigation



The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of alcohol hangover on simulated highway driving performance.


Driving performance of forty-two social drinkers was tested the morning following an evening of consuming on average 10.2 (SD = 4.2) alcoholic drinks (alcohol hangover) and on a control day (no alcohol consumed). Subjects performed a standardized 100-km highway driving test in the STISIM driving simulator. In addition to the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; i.e., the weaving of the car), lapses of attention were examined. Self-reported driving quality and driving style were scored, as well as mental effort to perform the test, sleepiness before and after driving, and hangover severity.


Driving performance was significantly impaired during alcohol hangover as expressed by an SDLP increase of +1.9 cm (t (1,41) = 2.851, p = 0.007), increased number of lapses relative to the control day (7.7 versus 5.3 lapses, t (1,41) = 2.125, p = 0.019), and an increased total lapse time (182.7 versus 127.3 s, p = 0.040). During alcohol hangover, subjects reported their driving quality to be significantly poorer (t (1,41) = 4.840, p = 0.001) and less safe (t (1,41) = 5.078, p = 0.001), wise (t (1,41) = 4.061, p = 0.001), predictable (t (1,41) = 3.475, p = 0.001), and responsible (t (1,41) = 4.122, p = 0.001). Subjects further reported being significantly more tense while driving (t (1,41) = 3.280, p = 0.002), and more effort was needed to perform the driving test (t (1,41) = 2.941, p = 0.001). There was a significant interaction with total sleep time and hangover effects on SDLP and the number of lapses.


In conclusion, driving is significantly impaired during alcohol hangover, as expressed in an elevated SDLP and increased number of lapses. Total sleep time has a significant impact on the magnitude of driving impairment.


Alcohol Hangover Driving SDLP Lapses 



Thanks to Gene Laska for his help with the symmetry analysis and Pieter van Dorp van Vliet for the artwork.

Conflict of interest

This study was funded by Utrecht University.

Joris Verster has received grants/research support from the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Takeda, and Red Bull and has acted as a consultant for the Canadian Beverage Association, Centraal Bureau Drogisterijbedrijven, Coleman Frost, Deenox, Purdue, Red Bull, Sanofi-Aventis, Sepracor, Takeda, Transcept, and Trimbos Institute.

Thomas Roth has received grants/research support from Aventis, Cephalon, GlaxoSmithKline, Neurocrine, Pfizer, Sanofi, Schering-Plough, Sepracor, Somaxon, Syrex, Takeda, TransOral, Wyeth, and Xenoport; has acted as a consultant for Abbott, Acadia, Acoglix, Actelion, Alchemers, Alza, Ancil, Arena, AstraZeneca, Aventis, AVER, BMS, BTG, Cephalon, Cypress, Dove, Elan, Eli Lilly, Evotec, Forest, GlaxoSmithKline, Hypnion, Impax, Intec, Intra-Cellular, Jazz, Johnson & Johnson, King, Lundbeck, McNeil, MediciNova, Merck, Neurim, Neurocrine, Neurogen, Novartis, Orexo, Organon, Prestwick, Procter & Gamble, Pfizer, Purdue, Resteva, Roche, Sanofi, Schering-Plough, Sepracor, Servier, Shire, Somaxon, Syrex, Takeda, TransOral, Vanda, Vivometrics, Wyeth, Yamanuchi, and Xenoport.

Berend Olivier is a scientific advisor for Emotional Brain BV and has received research support from Emotional Brain, PsychoGenics Inc, Sepracor, Servier, Abbott, and the Dutch Brain Research Organization.

Karel Brookhuis has received grants/research support from NWO, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, European Commission, Wyeth, Sanofi, Schering, Nissan, JARI, Mercedes Benz, and Verbond van Verzekeraars.

The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.


  1. Åkerstedt T, Gillberg M (1990) Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci 52:29–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookhuis KA, De Waard D, Samyn N (2004) Effects of MDMA (ecstacy), and multiple drug use on (simulated) driving performance and traffic safety. Psychopharmacology 173:440–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Helland A, Jenssen GD, Lervåg LE, Westin AA, Moen T, Sakshaug K, Lydersen S, Mørland J, Slørdal L (2013) Comparison of driving simulator performance with real driving after alcohol intake: a randomised, single blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Accid Anal Prev 53:9–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Howland J, Rohsenow DJ, Edwards EM (2008) Are some drinkers resistant to hangover? A literature review. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 1:42–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 3:203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim DJ, Kim W, Yoon SJ, Choi BM, Kim JS, Go HJ, Kim YK, Jeong J (2003) Effects of alcohol hangover on cytokine production in healthy subjects. Alcohol 31:167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laska E, Meisner M, Wanderling J (2012) A maximally selected test of symmetry about zero. Stat Med 31:3178–3191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laurell H, Törnros J (1983) Investigation of alcoholic hangover effects on driving performance. Blut Alcohol 20:489–499Google Scholar
  9. Ling J, Stephens R, Heffernan TM (2010) Cognitive and psychomotor performance during alcohol hangover. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 3:80–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Louwerens JW, Gloerich ABM, De Vries G, Brookhuis KA, O’Hanlon JF (1987) The relationship between drivers’ blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and actual driving performance during high speed travel. In: Noordzij PC, Roszbach R (eds) Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety-T86. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 183–183Google Scholar
  11. McCormick IA, Walkey FH, Green DE (1987) Comparative perceptions of driver ability—a confirmation and expansion. Accid Anal Prev 18:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McKinney A, Coyle K (2004) Next day effects of a normal night's drinking on memory and psychomotor performance. Alcohol Alcohol 39:509–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McKinney A, Coyle K (2006) Alcohol hangover effects on measures of affect the morning after a normal night's drinking. Alcohol Alcohol 41:54–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meijman TF, Thunnissen MJ, de Vries-Griever AGH (1990) The after-effects of a prolonged period of day-sleep on subjective sleep quality. Work Stress 4:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mets MA, Kuipers E, de Senerpont Domis LM, Leenders M, Olivier B, Verster JC (2011) Effects of alcohol on highway driving in the STISIM driving simulator. Hum Psychopharmacol 26:434–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Hanlon JF, Haak TW, Blauw GJ, Riemersma JBJ (1982) Diazepam impairs lateral position control in highway driving. Science 217:79–81Google Scholar
  17. Penning R, McKinney A, Verster JC (2012) Alcohol hangover symptoms and their contribution to overall hangover severity. Alcohol Alcoholism 47:248–252Google Scholar
  18. Penning R, van Nuland M, Fliervoet LA, Olivier B, Verster JC (2010) The pathology of alcohol hangover. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 3:68–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Penning R, McKinney A, Bus LD, Olivier B, Slot K, Verster JC (2013) Measurement of alcohol hangover severity: development of the Alcohol Hangover Severity Scale (AHSS). Psychopharmacology 225:803–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roehrs T, Beare D, Zorick F, Roth T (1994) Sleepiness and ethanol effects on simulated driving. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 8:154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rohsenow DJ, Howland J, Minsky S, Greece J, Almeida A, Roehrs TA (2007) The acute hangover scale: a new measure of immediate hangover symptoms. Addict behav 32:1314–1320PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephens R, Ling J, Heffernan TM, Heather N, Jones K (2008) A review of the literature on the cognitive effects of alcohol hangover. Alcohol Alcohol 43:163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Törnros J, Laurell H (1991) Acute and hangover effects of alcohol on simulated driving performance. Blut Alcohol 28:24–30Google Scholar
  24. Verster JC, Roth T (2011) Standard operation procedures for conducting the on-the-road driving test, and measurement of the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Int J Gen Med 4:359–371PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Verster JC, Roth T (2012) Predicting psychopharmacological drug effects on actual driving (SDLP) from psychometric tests measuring driving-related skills. Psychopharmacology 220(2):293–301PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verster JC, Stephens R, Penning R, Rohsenow D, McGeary J, Levy D, McKinney A, Finnigan F, Piasecki TM, Adan A, Batty GD, Fliervoet LAL, Heffernan T, Howland J, Kim D-J, Kruisselbrink LD, Ling J, McGregor N, Murphy RJL, van Nuland M, Oudelaar AM, Parkes A, Prat G, Reed N, Slutske WS, Smith G, Young M, on behalf of the Alcohol Hangover Research Group (2010) The Alcohol Hangover Research Group consensus statement on best practice in alcohol hangover research. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 3:116–127PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verster JC, Tiplady B, McKinney A (2012) Mobile technology and naturalistic study designs in addiction research. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 5:169–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Verster JC, van der Maarel M, McKinney A, Olivier B, de Haan L (2014a) Driving during alcohol hangover among Dutch professional truck drivers. Traffic Inj Prev. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.833329 Google Scholar
  29. Verster JC, Bervoets AC, de Klerk S, Roth T (2014b) Lapses of attention as outcome measure of the on-the-road driving test. Psychopharmacology 231:283–292Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joris C. Verster
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Adriana C. Bervoets
    • 1
  • Suzanne de Klerk
    • 1
  • Rick A. Vreman
    • 1
  • Berend Olivier
    • 1
  • Thomas Roth
    • 3
  • Karel A. Brookhuis
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Human PsychopharmacologySwinburne UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Sleep Disorders and Research CenterHenry Ford Health SystemDetroitUSA
  4. 4.Faculty of Behavioral and Social SciencesGroningen UniversityGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations