Synergistic interaction between caloric restriction and amphetamine in food-unrelated approach behavior of rats
Approach behavior is regulated by the brain integrating information about environment and body state. Psychoactive drugs interact with this process.
We examined the extent to which caloric (i.e., food) restriction, amphetamine (AMPH) and lithium interact in potentiating locomotor activity and responding reinforced by visual stimulus (VS), a reward unrelated to energy homeostasis.
Rats either had ad libitum access to food or received daily rations that maintained 85–90 % of their original body weights. Leverpressing turned on a cue light for 1 s and turned off house light for 5 s. AMPH and lithium were administered through intraperitoneal injections and diet, respectively.
Food restriction or AMPH (1 mg/kg) alone had little effect on VS-reinforced responding; however, the combination of the two conditions markedly potentiated VS-reinforced responding (fourfold). Food restriction lasting 7 days or longer was needed to augment AMPH's effect on VS-reinforced responding. AMPH (0.3–3 mg/kg) potentiated locomotor activity similarly between food-restricted and ad libitum groups. Repeated injections of AMPH-sensitized locomotor activity, but not VS-reinforced responding. In addition, while chronic lithium treatments (0.2 % lithium carbonate chow) reduced VS-reinforced responding, chronic lithium further augmented AMPH-potentiated VS-reinforced responding.
Food restriction interacts with psychoactive drugs to potentiate goal-directed responding unrelated to food seeking in a much more powerful manner than previously thought. The novel finding that lithium can augment a psychostimulant effect of AMPH suggests caution when combining lithium and psychostimulant drugs in clinical settings.
KeywordsDietary restriction Incentive motivation Manic–depressive illness Visual sensation Drug abuse Amphetamine Lithium
The present work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Ms. Amy N. Hamaker for conducting a pilot experiment and Dr. T. D. Gould for helping with lithium concentration analysis.
The authors have no financial disclosure to make.
- American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, p 567Google Scholar
- Bindra D (1969) The interrelated mechanisms of reinforcement and motivation, and the nature of their influence on response. In: Arnold WJ, Levine D (eds) Nebraska symposium on motivation, vol. 17. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 1–33Google Scholar
- Bond DJ, Hadjipavlou G, Lam RW, McIntyre RS, Beaulieu S, Schaffer A, Weiss M (2012) The Canadian network for mood and anxiety treatments (CANMAT) task force recommendations for the management of patients with mood disorders and comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Ann Clin Psychiatry 24:23–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Breitbart W, Alici Y (2010) Psychostimulants for cancer-related fatigue. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8:933–942Google Scholar
- Cabeza de Vaca S, Krahne LL, Carr KD (2004) A progressive ratio schedule of self-stimulation testing in rats reveals profound augmentation of d-amphetamine reward by food restriction but no effect of a “sensitizing” regimen of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 175:106–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Damasio AR (2010) Self comes to mind. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Donny EC, Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Evans-Martin FF, Booth S, Gharib MA, Clements LA, Sved AF (2003) Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 169:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garatitini S (eds) Amphetamine and related compounds. Raven Press, New York, pp 781–795Google Scholar
- Ikemoto S, Panksepp J (1999) The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res Rev 31:6–41Google Scholar
- Kish GB (1966) Studies of sensory reinforcement. In: Honing WK (ed) Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 109–159Google Scholar
- McDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- McElroy SL, Altshuler LL, Suppes T, Paul E, Keck J, Frye MA, Denicoff KD, Nolen WA, Kupka RW, Leverich GS, Rochussen JR, Rush AJ, Post RM (2001) Axis I psychiatric comorbidity and its relationship to historical illness variables in 288 patients with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 158:420–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council (2011) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- NDP Group (2013) The NPD Group reports dieting is at an all-time low-dieting season has begun, but it's not what it used to be! Available via https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/the-npd-group-reports-dieting-is-at-an-all-time-low-dieting-season-has-begun-but-its-not-what-it-used-to-be/. Accessed 30 Aug 2013
- Panksepp J (1998) Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar