Dopaminergic stimulation increases selfish behavior in the absence of punishment threat
- 647 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
Rationale
People often face decisions that pit self-interested behavior aimed at maximizing personal reward against normative behavior such as acting cooperatively, which benefits others. The threat of social sanctions for defying the fairness norm prevents people from behaving overly selfish. Thus, normative behavior is influenced by both seeking rewards and avoiding punishment. However, the neurochemical processes mediating the impact of these influences remain unknown. Several lines of evidence link the dopaminergic system to reward and punishment processing, respectively, but this evidence stems from studies in non-social contexts.
Objectives
The present study investigates dopaminergic drug effects on individuals' reward seeking and punishment avoidance in social interaction.
Methods
Two-hundred one healthy male participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) or a placebo before playing an economic bargaining game. This game involved two conditions, one in which unfair behavior could be punished and one in which unfair behavior could not be punished.
Results
In the absence of punishment threats, L-DOPA administration led to more selfish behavior, likely mediated through an increase in reward seeking. In contrast, L-DOPA administration had no significant effect on behavior when faced with punishment threats.
Conclusions
The results of this study broaden the role of the dopaminergic system in reward seeking to human social interactions. We could show that even a single dose of a dopaminergic drug may bring selfish behavior to the fore, which in turn may shed new light on potential causal relationships between the dopaminergic system and norm abiding behaviors in certain clinical subpopulations.
Keywords
Dopamine Reward Punishment Normative behavior Decision makingNotes
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by a grant to DK by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P1_123381). CE acknowledges support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (PA00P1_134135).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Bayer HM, Glimcher PW (2005) Midbrain dopamine neurons encode a quantitative reward prediction error signal. Neuron 47:129–41PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bodi N, Keri S, Nagy H, Moustafa A, Myers CE, Daw N, Dibo G, Takats A, Bereczki D, Gluck MA (2009) Reward-learning and the novelty-seeking personality: a between- and within-subjects study of the effects of dopamine agonists on young Parkinson's patients. Brain 132:2385–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brischoux F, Chakraborty S, Brierley DI, Ungless MA (2009) Phasic excitation of dopamine neurons in ventral VTA by noxious stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4894–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buckholtz JW, Treadway MT, Cowan RL, Woodward ND, Benning SD, Li R, Ansari MS, Baldwin RM, Schwartzman AN, Shelby ES, Smith CE, Cole D, Kessler RM, Zald DH (2010) Mesolimbic dopamine reward system hypersensitivity in individuals with psychopathic traits. Nat Neurosci 13:419–421PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carver CS, White TL (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chamberlain SR, Muller U, Blackwell AD, Clark L, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2006) Neurochemical modulation of response inhibition and probabilistic learning in humans. Science 311:861–3PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dagher A, Robbins TW (2009) Personality, addiction, dopamine: insights from Parkinson's disease. Neuron 61:502–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Brita SA, Hodgins S (2009) Antisocial personality disorder. In: McMurran M, Howard R (eds) Personality, personality disorder and violence: an evidence based approach. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Eisenegger C, Knoch D, Ebstein RP, Gianotti LR, Sandor PS, Fehr E (2010) Dopamine receptor D4 polymorphism predicts the effect of L-DOPA on gambling behavior. Biol Psychiat 67:702–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guitart-Masip M, Chowdhury R, Sharot T, Dayan P, Duzel E, Dolan RJ (2012) Action controls dopaminergic enhancement of reward representations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7511–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gunter TD, Vaughn MG, Philibert RA (2010) Behavioral genetics in antisocial spectrum disorders and psychopathy: a review of the recent literature. Behav Sci Law 28:148–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analyses of ultimatium bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:367–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haselhuhn MP, Mellers BA (2005) Emotions and cooperation in economic games. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23:24–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henrich J, Ensminger J, McElreath R, Barr A, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, Gurven M, Gwako E, Henrich N, Lesorogol C, Marlowe F, Tracer D, Ziker J (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327:1480–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heym N, Ferguson E, Lawrence C (2008) An evaluation of the relationship between Gray's revised RST and Eysenck's PEN: distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Pers Indiv Differ 45:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ikemoto S, Panksepp J (1999) The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 31:6–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lammel S, Ion DI, Roeper J, Malenka RC (2011) Projection-specific modulation of dopamine neuron synapses by aversive and rewarding stimuli. Neuron 70:855–62PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lammel S, Lim BK, Ran C, Huang KW, Betley MJ, Tye KM, Deisseroth K, Malenka RC (2012) Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 491:212–7PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leyton M, Boileau I, Benkelfat C, Diksic M, Baker G, Dagher A (2002) Amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: a PET/[11C]raclopride study in healthy men. Neuropsychopharmacol 27:1027–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maia TV (2010) Two-factor theory, the actor-critic model, and conditioned avoidance. Learn Behav 38:50–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto M, Hikosaka O (2009) Two types of dopamine neuron distinctly convey positive and negative motivational signals. Nature 459:837–41PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mirenowicz J, Schultz W (1996) Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli. Nature 379:449–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mowrer O (1947) On the dual nature of learning – a re-interpretation of "conditioning" and "problem-solving". Harv Educ Rev 17:102–148Google Scholar
- Norris H (1971) The action of sedatives on brain stem oculomotor systems in man. Neuropharmacol 10:181–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O'Sullivan SS, Lees AJ (2011) Dopamine dysregulation syndrome Parkinson's disease. Blackwell, London, pp 202–214Google Scholar
- Pessiglione M, Seymour B, Flandin G, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2006) Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature 442:1042–5PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25:111–164Google Scholar
- Robinson OJ, Standing HR, DeVito EE, Cools R, Sahakian BJ (2010) Dopamine precursor depletion improves punishment prediction during reversal learning in healthy females but not males. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 211:187–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers RD (2011) The roles of dopamine and serotonin in decision making: evidence from pharmacological experiments in humans. Neuropsychopharmacol 36:114–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rouder JN, Speckman PL, Sun D, Morey RD, Iverson G (2009) Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev 16:225–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rounsaville BJ (2004) Treatment of cocaine dependence and depression. Biol Psychiat 56:803–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salamone JD (1994) The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation. Behav Brain Res 61:117–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scheres A, Sanfey AG (2006) Individual differences in decision making: Drive and reward responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games. Behav Brain Funct 2:35PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schultz W (2007) Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:259–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharot T, Shiner T, Brown AC, Fan J, Dolan RJ (2009) Dopamine enhances expectation of pleasure in humans. Curr Biol 19:2077–80PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soderstrom H, Blennow K, Manhem A, Forsman A (2001) CSF studies in violent offenders - I. 5-HIAA as a negative and HVA as a positive predictor of psychopathy. J Neural Transm 108:869–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spitzer M, Fischbacher U, Herrnberger B, Gron G, Fehr E (2007) The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron 56:185–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ungless MA, Magill PJ, Bolam JP (2004) Uniform inhibition of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area by aversive stimuli. Science 303:2040–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar