Alcohol attenuates amygdala–frontal connectivity during processing social signals in heavy social drinkers
- 920 Downloads
Convergent evidence shows that alcohol exerts its effects on social behavior via modulation of amygdala reactivity to affective stimuli. Given that affective processing involves dynamic interactions between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex (PFC), alcohol’s effects are likely to extend beyond regional changes in brain activity to changes that manifest on a broader functional circuit level.
The current study examines alcohol’s effects on functional connectivity (i.e., "coupling") between the amygdala and the PFC during the processing of socio-emotional stimuli using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
In a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, within-subjects cross-over design, 12 heavy, social drinkers performed an fMRI task designed to probe amygdala response to socio-emotional stimuli (angry, fearful, and happy faces) following acute ingestion of alcohol or placebo. Functional connectivity between the amygdala and PFC was examined and compared between alcohol and placebo sessions using a conventional generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) analysis.
Relative to placebo, alcohol reduced functional coupling between the amygdala and the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) during processing of both angry and fearful faces. Alcohol also reduced functional coupling between the amygdala and left OFC during processing of happy faces.
These preliminary findings suggest that alcohol’s effects on social behavior may be mediated by alternations in functional connectivity between the amygdala and OFC during processing of emotional faces.
KeywordsAlcohol Amygdala Functional connectivity Social threat
- Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Saunders J, Grant M (1989) The Alcohol Use Identification Test: guidelines for use in primary health care. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Beauregard M, Levesque J, Bourgouin P (2001) Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion. J Neurosci 21:6993–7000Google Scholar
- First MB, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M (1995) Structured clinical interview for DSMIV—patient edition (SCID-P). American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Fridlund AJ (1994) Human facial expression: an evolutionary view. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Fusar-Poli P, Placentino A, Carletti F, Landi P, Allen P, Surguladze S, Benedetti F, Abbamonte M, Gasparotti R, Barale F, Perez J, McGuire P, Politi P (2009) Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Psychiat Neurosci 34:418–32Google Scholar
- Gur RC, Sara R, Hagendoorn M, Marom O, Hughett P, Macy L, Turner T, Bajcsy R, Posner A, Gur RE (2002) A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies. J Neurosci Meth 115:137–143. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00006-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holmes AP, Friston KJ (1998) Generalisability, random effects and population inference. Neuroimage: Abstracts of the Fourth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain 7:S754Google Scholar
- Hull JG (1987) Self-awareness model. In: Blane HT, Leonard KE (eds) Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism. Guilford Press, New York, pp 272–304Google Scholar
- Lévesque J, Eugène F, Joanette Y, Paquette V, Mensour B, Beaudoin G, Leroux JM, Pierre Bourgouin, Beauregard M (2003) Neural circuitry underlying voluntary suppression of sadness. Biol Psychiat 53:502–510. doi:10.1016/S0002-3223(03)01817-6
- McLaren D, Ries M, Xu G, Fitzgerald M, Kastman E, Gliori G, Jabbar B, Johnson S (2008) A method for improved sensitivity and flexibility of psychophysiological interactions in event-related fMRI experiments. Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain MappingGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell JP, Mason MF, Macrae CN, Banaji MR (2006) Thinking about others: the neural substrates of social cognition. In: Cacioppo JT, Visser PS, Pickett CL (eds) Social Neuroscience: people thinking about thinking people. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 63–82Google Scholar
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA; 2005a) Helping patients with alcohol problems: a clinician’s guide. NIH Pub No. 05–3769. Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA; (2005b) Recommended council guidelines on ethyl alcohol administration in human experimentation. National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- Nomura M, Ohira H, Haneda K, Iidaka T, Sadato N, Okada T, Yonekura Y (2004) Functional association of the amygdale and ventral prefrontal cortex during cognitive evaluation of facial expressions primed by masked angry faces: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 21:352–363. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.021 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Daly OG, Trick L, Scaife J, Marshall J, Ball D, Phillips ML, Williams SC, Stephens DN, Duka T (2012) Withdrawal-associated increases and decreases in functional neural connectivity associated with altered emotional regulation in alcoholism. Neuropsychopharmacol 37:2267–2276. doi:10.1038/npp.2012.77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parent MB, Krebs-Kraft DL, Ryan JP, Wilson JS, Harenski C, Hamann S (2011) Glucose administration enhances fMRI brain activation and connectivity related to episodic memory encoding for neutral and emotional stimuli. Neuropsychologia 49:1052–1066. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pitel AL, Chanraud S, Müller-Oehring EM, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2012) Modulation of limbic–cerebellar functional connectivity enables alcoholics to recognize who is who. Brain Struct Funct 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00429-012-0421-6
- SAMHSA (2005) National survey on drug use and health. Office of Applied Studies, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- Sobell LC, Sobell MB (1995) Alcohol timeline follow-back users’ manual. Addiction Research Foundation, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Luschene R (1970) Test manual for the state–trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- Stenger VA, Boada FE, Noll DC (2000) Three–dimensional tailored RF pulses for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in T(*)(2)–weighted functional MRI. Mag Reson Med 44:525–531. doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<525::AID-MRM5>3.0.CO;2-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tebartz van Elst L, Hesslinger B, Thiel T, Geiger E, Haegele K, Lemieux L, Lieb K, Bohus M, Henning J, Ebert D (2003) Frontolimbic brain abnormalities in patients with borderline personality disorder: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiat 54:163–171. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01743-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Urry HL, van Reekum CM, Johnstone T, Kalin NH, Thurow ME, Schaefer HS et al (2006) Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predict the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults. J Neurosci 26:4415–25. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3215-05.2006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar