Psychopharmacology

, Volume 229, Issue 1, pp 105–113 | Cite as

Decreased consumption of sweet fluids in mu opioid receptor knockout mice: a microstructural analysis of licking behavior

  • Sean B. Ostlund
  • Alisa Kosheleff
  • Nigel T. Maidment
  • Niall P. Murphy
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Evidence suggests that the palatability of food (i.e., the hedonic impact produced by its sensory features) can promote feeding and may underlie compulsive eating, leading to obesity. Pharmacological studies implicate opioid transmission in the hedonic control of feeding, though these studies often rely on agents lacking specificity for particular opioid receptors.

Objectives

Here, we investigated the role of mu opioid receptors (MORs) specifically in determining hedonic responses to palatable sweet stimuli.

Methods

In Experiment 1, licking microstructure when consuming sucrose solution (2 to 20 %) was compared in MOR knockout and wildtype mice as a function of sucrose concentration and level of food deprivation. In Experiment 2, a similar examination was conducted using the palatable but calorie-free stimulus sucralose (0.001 to 1 %), allowing study of licking behavior independent of homeostatic variables.

Results

In Experiment 1, MOR knockout mice exhibited several alterations in sucrose licking. Although wildtype mice exhibited a twofold increase in the burst length when food deprived, relative to the nondeprived test, this aspect of sucrose licking was generally insensitive to manipulations of food deprivation for MOR knockout mice. Furthermore, during concentration testing, their rate of sucrose licking was less than half that of wildtype mice. During sucralose testing (Experiment 2), MOR knockout mice licked at approximately half the wildtype rate, providing more direct evidence that MOR knockout mice were impaired in processing stimulus palatability.

Conclusions

These results suggest that transmission through MORs mediates hedonic responses to palatable stimuli, and therefore likely contributes to normal and pathological eating.

Keywords

Opioid Feeding Reward Motivation Knockout Mice Appetite Licking Palatability Sugar 

References

  1. Apfelbaum M, Mandenoff A (1981) Naltrexone suppresses hyperphagia induced in the rat by a highly palatable diet. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:89–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbano MF, Cador M (2006) Differential regulation of the consummatory, motivational and anticipatory aspects of feeding behavior by dopaminergic and opioidergic drugs. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:1371–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbano MF, Le Saux M, Cador M (2009) Involvement of dopamine and opioids in the motivation to eat: influence of palatability, homeostatic state, and behavioral paradigms. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 203:475–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beczkowska IW, Bowen WD, Bodnar RJ (1992) Central opioid receptor subtype antagonists differentially alter sucrose and deprivation-induced water-intake in rats. Brain Research 589:291–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodnar RJ (2004) Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30-year historical perspective. Peptides 25:697–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodnar RJ, Glass MJ, Ragnauth A, Cooper ML (1995) General, mu and kappa opioid antagonists in the nucleus accumbens alter food intake under deprivation, glucoprivic and palatable conditions. Brain Res 700:205–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleary J, Weldon DT, O'Hare E, Billington C, Levine AS (1996) Naloxone effects on sucrose-motivated behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 126:110–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D'Aquila PS (2010) Dopamine on D2-like receptors "reboosts" dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for sucrose. Neuropharmacology 58:1085–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis JD (1989) The microstructure of ingestive behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci 575:106–19, discussion 120-1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis JD, Smith GP (1988) Analysis of lick rate measures the positive and negative feedback effects of carbohydrates on eating. Appetite 11:229–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frisina PG, Sclafani A (2002) Naltrexone suppresses the late but not early licking response to a palatable sweet solution: opioid hedonic hypothesis reconsidered. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 74:163–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giraudo SQ, Grace MK, Billington CJ, Levine AS (1999) Differential effects of neuropeptide Y and the mu-agonist DAMGO on 'palatability' vs. 'energy'. Brain Res 834:160–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gosnell BA, Levine AS, Morley JE (1986) The stimulation of food intake by selective agonists of mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors. Life Sci 38:1081–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosnell BA, Majchrzak MJ (1989) Centrally administered opioid peptides stimulate saccharin intake in nondeprived rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 33:805–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH (2009) The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Publ Health 9:88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall FS, Li XF, Goeb M, Roff S, Hoggatt H, Sora I, Uhl GR (2003) Congenic C57BL/6 mu opiate receptor (MOR) knockout mice: baseline and opiate effects. Genes brain and behavior 2:114–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Han W, Hata H, Imbe H, Liu QR, Takamatsu Y, Koizumi M, Murphy NP, Senba E, Uhl GR, Sora I, Ikeda K (2006) Increased body weight in mice lacking mu-opioid receptors. Neuroreport 17:941–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgs S, Cooper SJ (1998) Evidence for early opioid modulation of licking responses to sucrose and intralipid: a microstructural analysis in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 139:342–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Islam AK, Bodnar RJ (1990) Selective opioid receptor antagonist effects upon intake of a high-fat diet in rats. Brain Res 508:293–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson AW, Sherwood A, Smith DR, Wosiski-Kuhn M, Gallagher M, Holland PC (2010) An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice. Appetite 54:320–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kas MJ, van den Bos R, Baars AM, Lubbers M, Lesscher HM, Hillebrand JJ, Schuller AG, Pintar JE, Spruijt BM (2004) Mu-opioid receptor knockout mice show diminished food-anticipatory activity. Eur J Neurosci 20:1624–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelley AE, Bakshi VP, Haber SN, Steininger TL, Will MJ, Zhang M (2002) Opioid modulation of taste hedonics within the ventral striatum. Physiol Behav 76:365–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkham TC (1990) Enhanced anorectic potency of naloxone in rats sham feeding 30 % sucrose: reversal by repeated naloxone administration. Physiol Behav 47:419–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirkham TC, Blundell JE (1984) Dual action of naloxone on feeding revealed by behavioural analysis: separate effects on initiation and termination of eating. Appetite 5:45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkham TC, Blundell JE (1987) Effects of naloxone and naltrexone on meal patterns of freely-feeding rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26:515–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laurent V, Leung B, Maidment N, Balleine BW (2012) mu- and delta-opioid-related processes in the accumbens core and shell differentially mediate the influence of reward-guided and stimulus-guided decisions on choice. J Neurosci 32:1875–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leventhal L, Kirkham TC, Cole JL, Bodnar RJ (1995a) Selective actions of central mu and kappa opioid antagonists upon sucrose intake in sham-fed rats. Brain Res 685:205–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leventhal L, Kirkham TC, Cole JL, Bodnar RJ (1995b) Selective actions of central mu-opioid and kappa-opioid antagonists upon sucrose intake in sham-fed rats. Brain Research 685:205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine AS, Weldon DT, Grace M, Cleary JP, Billington CJ (1995) Naloxone blocks that portion of feeding driven by sweet taste in food-restricted rats. Am J Physiol 268:R248–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Marks-Kaufman R (1982) Increased fat consumption induced by morphine administration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 16:949–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marks-Kaufman R, Kanarek RB (1981) Modifications of nutrient selection induced by naloxone in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 74:321–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthes HW, Maldonado R, Simonin F, Valverde O, Slowe S, Kitchen I, Befort K, Dierich A, Le Meur M, Dolle P, Tzavara E, Hanoune J, Roques BP, Kieffer BL (1996) Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature 383:819–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Millan MJ, Brocco M (2003) The Vogel conflict test: procedural aspects, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and monoamines. Eur J Pharmacol 463:67–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nogueiras R, Romero-Pico A, Vazquez MJ, Novelle MG, Lopez M, Dieguez C (2012) The opioid system and food intake: homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms. Obes Facts 5:196–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olszewski PK, Alsio J, Schioth HB, Levine AS (2011) Opioids as facilitators of feeding: can any food be rewarding? Physiol Behav 104:105–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Papaleo F, Kieffer BL, Tabarin A, Contarino A (2007) Decreased motivation to eat in mu-opioid receptor-deficient mice. Eur J Neurosci 25:3398–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pecina S, Berridge KC (2005) Hedonic hot spot in nucleus accumbens shell: where do mu-opioids cause increased hedonic impact of sweetness? J Neurosci 25:11777–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pecina S, Smith KS (2010) Hedonic and motivational roles of opioids in food reward: implications for overeating disorders. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 97:34–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pecina S, Smith KS, Berridge KC (2006) Hedonic hot spots in the brain. Neuroscientist 12:500–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Solinas M, Goldberg SR (2005) Motivational effects of cannabinoids and opioids on food reinforcement depend on simultaneous activation of cannabinoid and opioid systems. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:2035–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stromberg MF, Meister S, Volpicelli JR, Ulm RR (1997) Morphine enhances selection of both sucrose and ethanol in a two-bottle test. Alcohol 14:55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tabarin A, Diz-Chaves Y, Carmona Mdel C, Catargi B, Zorrilla EP, Roberts AJ, Coscina DV, Rousset S, Redonnet A, Parker GC, Inoue K, Ricquier D, Penicaud L, Kieffer BL, Koob GF (2005) Resistance to diet-induced obesity in mu-opioid receptor-deficient mice: evidence for a "thrifty gene". Diabetes 54:3510–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wassum KM, Cely IC, Balleine BW, Maidment NT (2011) Micro-opioid receptor activation in the basolateral amygdala mediates the learning of increases but not decreases in the incentive value of a food reward. J Neurosci 31:1591–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wassum KM, Ostlund SB, Maidment NT, Balleine BW (2009) Distinct opioid circuits determine the palatability and the desirability of rewarding events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:12512–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weijnen JA (1998) Licking behavior in the rat: measurement and situational control of licking frequency. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:751–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wise RA, Raptis L (1986) Effects of naloxone and pimozide on initiation and maintenance measures of free feeding. Brain research 368:62–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeomans MR, Blundell JE, Leshem M (2004) Palatability: response to nutritional need or need-free stimulation of appetite? Br J Nutr 92(Suppl 1):S3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yeomans MR, Gray RW (2002) Opioid peptides and the control of human ingestive behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:713–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang M, Balmadrid C, Kelley AE (2003) Nucleus accumbens opioid, GABaergic, and dopaminergic modulation of palatable food motivation: contrasting effects revealed by a progressive ratio study in the rat. Behav Neurosci 117:202–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang M, Gosnell BA, Kelley AE (1998) Intake of high-fat food is selectively enhanced by mu opioid receptor stimulation within the nucleus accumbens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:908–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang M, Kelley AE (1997) Opiate agonists microinjected into the nucleus accumbens enhance sucrose drinking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 132:350–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean B. Ostlund
    • 1
  • Alisa Kosheleff
    • 1
  • Nigel T. Maidment
    • 1
  • Niall P. Murphy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations