Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 226, Issue 2, pp 241–246 | Cite as

Discriminative stimulus effects of N,N-diisopropyltryptamine

  • Theresa M Carbonaro
  • Michael J Forster
  • Michael B Gatch
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Serotonergic hallucinogens such as (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and dimethyltryptamine (DMT) produce distinctive visual effects, whereas the synthetic hallucinogen N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (DiPT) is known for its production of auditory distortions.

Objective

This study compares the discriminative stimulus effects of DiPT to those of visual hallucinogens.

Methods

Adult male rats were trained to discriminate DiPT (5 mg/kg, 15 min) from saline under a FR10 schedule. A dose–effect and time course of DiPT's discriminative stimulus effects were established. DMT, (−)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), LSD, (±)-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and (+)-methamphetamine were tested for cross-substitution in DiPT-trained animals.

Results

Rats learned to discriminate DiPT from saline in an average of 60 training sessions (30 drug and 30 saline). DiPT (0.5–5 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent increases in drug-appropriate responding (DAR) to 99 % (ED50 = 2.47 mg/kg). Onset of the discriminative stimulus effects was within 5 min, and the effects dissipated within 4 h. Full substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of DiPT occurred with LSD, DOM, and MDMA. DMT only partially substituted for DiPT (65 % DAR), whereas (+)-methamphetamine failed to substitute for DiPT (29 % DAR).

Conclusions

The discriminative stimulus effects of DiPT were similar those of a number of synthetic hallucinogens, only partially similar to those of DMT, but not similar to (+)-methamphetamine. The putative DiPT-induced auditory distortions do not lead to discriminative stimulus effects distinguishable from other hallucinogens.

Keywords

N,N-Diisopropyltryptamine Hallucinogens Drug discrimination Rat 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the Addiction Treatment Discovery Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH N01DA-7-8872) and by T32 AG020494.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Appel JB, West WB, Rolandi WG, Alici T, Pechersky K (1999) Increasing the selectivity of drug discrimination procedures. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:353–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckholtz NS, Boggan WO (1977) Monoamine oxidase inhibition in brain and liver produced by beta-carbolines: structure–activity relationships and substrate specificity. Biochem Pharmacol 26:1991–1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cozzi NV, Gopalakrishnan A, Anderson LL, Feih JT, Shulgin AT, Daley PF, Ruoho AE (2009) Dimethyltryptamine and other hallucinogenic tryptamines exhibit substrate behavior at the serotonin uptake transporter and the vesicle monoamine transporter. J Neural Transm 116:1591–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gatch MB, Rutledge MA, Carbonaro T, Forster MJ (2009) Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of dimethyltryptamine with different classes of psychoactive compounds in rats. Psychopharmacology 204:715–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gatch MB, Forster MJ, Janowsky A, Eshleman AJ (2011) Abuse liability profile of three substituted tryptamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 338:280–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glennon RA (1986) Discriminative stimulus properties of phenylisopropylamine derivatives. Drug Alcohol Depend 17:119–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glennon RA (1988) Site-selective serotonin agonists as discriminative stimuli. Psychopharmacol Ser 4:15–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Glennon RA (1999) Arylalkylamine drugs of abuse: an overview of drug discrimination studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:251–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glennon RA, Young R, Jacyno JM, Slusher M, Rosecrans JA (1983) DOM-stimulus generalization to LSD and other hallucinogenic indolealkylamines. Eur J Pharmacol 86:453–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helsley S, Fiorella D, Rabin RA, Winter JC (1998) A comparison of N, N-dimethyltryptamine, harmaline, and selected congeners in rats trained with LSD as a discriminative stimulus. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 22:649–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jarbe TU (1980) LSD-25 as a discriminative stimulus for response selection by pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:549–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nagai F, Nonaka R, Satoh K, Kamimura H (2007) The effects of non-medically used psychoactive drugs on monoamine neurotransmission in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol 559:132–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Research Council (2003) Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research. The National Academies, Washington (DC)Google Scholar
  14. Nichols DE (2004) Hallucinogens. Pharmacol Ther 101:131–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pierce PA, Peroutka SJ (1989) Hallucinogenic drug interactions with neurotransmitter receptor binding sites in human cortex. Psychopharmacology 97:118–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shulgin AT, Carter MF (1980) N, N-Diisopropyltryptamine (DIPT) and 5-methoxy-N, N-diisopropyltryptamine (5-MeO-DIPT). Two orally active tryptamine analogs with CNS activity. Commun Psychopharmacol 4:363–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shulgin AT, Shulgin A (1997) TiHKAL: The continuation. Transform, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Strassman RJ, Qualls CR, Berg LM (1996) Differential tolerance to biological and subjective effects of four closely spaced doses of N, N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. Biol Psychiatry 39:784–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Titeler M, Lyon RA, Glennon RA (1988) Radioligand binding evidence implicates the brain 5-HT2 receptor as a site of action for LSD and phenylisopropylamine hallucinogens. Psychopharmacology 94:213–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Winter JC (2009) Hallucinogens as discriminative stimuli in animals: LSD, phenethylamines, and tryptamines. Psychopharmacology 203:251–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theresa M Carbonaro
    • 1
  • Michael J Forster
    • 1
  • Michael B Gatch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and NeuroscienceUniversity of North Texas Health Science CenterFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations