Associative blocking to reward-predicting cues is attenuated in ketamine users but can be modulated by images associated with drug use
- 575 Downloads
Blocking is an associative learning process that is attenuated in schizophrenia, can be modulated by cue salience and is accompanied by changes in selective attention. Repeated exposure to ketamine can model aspects of schizophrenia, and frequent users selectively attend to images of the drug.
This study aimed to establish whether (1) ketamine users show attenuated blocking to reward-predicting cues and (2) drug cues can modulate blocking and cause overshadowing of neutral cues that are equally predictive of reward in these individuals.
Ketamine users (n = 18) and polydrug controls (n = 16) were assessed on the Drug Cue Reward Prediction Error Task, which indexes blocking and overshadowing to neutral and drug-related cues following Pavlovian reward conditioning. Schizotypy, depression, drug history and ketamine dependence were also assessed.
Compared to controls, ketamine users showed elevated delusional, schizotypal and depressive symptoms, and a reduction in blocking as evidenced by higher accuracy to blocked cues. Drug-related cues were resistant to blocking and seen as more important for earning money by ketamine users compared to controls. Both groups showed overshadowing of neutral cues by drug cues, and ketamine users gave both of these cues higher importance ratings than controls.
These findings provide the first evidence that (1) glutamatergic perturbation is linked to a reduction in blocking and (2) blocking can be modulated by the presence of drug-related cues. The ability of drug cues to bias selective learning about ‘alternative rewards’ has implications for contingency management based addiction treatments.
KeywordsAttention Learning and memory Glutamate Schizophrenia Addiction Reward
This study was funded by an interdisciplinary MRC/ESRC studentship to TP Freeman. We would like to thank Tom Beesley and Beatriz Orgaz for their assistance and all volunteers for taking part.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- Bender S, Muller B, Oades RD, Sartory G (2001) Conditioned blocking and schizophrenia: a replication and study of the role of symptoms, age, onset-age of psychosis and illness duration. Schizophr Res 49:157–170Google Scholar
- Cassaday HJ, Moran PM (2010) Latent inhibition and other salience modulation effects: Same neural substrates? In: Lubow RE, Weiner I (eds) Latent inhibition: Cognition, neuroscience, and applications to schizophrenia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Corlett PR, Honey GD, Aitken MR, Dickinson A, Shanks DR, Absalom AR, Lee M, Pomarol-Clotet E, Murray GK, McKenna PJ, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET, Fletcher PC (2006) Frontal responses during learning predict vulnerability to the psychotogenic effects of ketamine: linking cognition, brain activity, and psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:611–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heckler AF, Kaminski JA, Sloutsky VM (2006). Differential cue salience, blocking, and learned inattention. In: R. Sun, N. Miyake (Eds.) Proceedings of the XXVIII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
- Kamin LJ (1969) Selective association and conditioning. In: Mackintosh NJ, Honig WK (eds) Fundamental issues in associative learning. Dalhousie University Press, Halifax, pp 42–64Google Scholar
- Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF (eds) Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 64–99Google Scholar
- Stone JM, Dietrich C, Edden R, Mehta MA, De Simoni S, Reed LJ, Krystal JH et al (2012) Ketamine effects on brain GABA and glutamate levels with 1H-MRS: relationship to ketamine-induced psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.171