Behavioral inhibition in mice bred for high vs. low levels of methamphetamine consumption or sensitization
- First Online:
Research indicates that genetics influence methamphetamine self-administration as well as sensitization to the psychomotor-stimulating effects of methamphetamine (MA). Other studies have suggested that heightened levels of impulsivity, including low levels of behavioral inhibition, are associated with the use of drugs, including MA.
The current study examined whether lines of mice selected for traits associated with a heightened risk of developing MA dependence would also exhibit low levels of drug-naïve inhibition and whether administration of MA would result in different levels of inhibition in animals selected to consume or respond more to MA.
A go/no-go task was used to assess inhibition in male and female mice selected for low or high levels of MA consumption or selected for high or low levels of locomotor sensitization to repeated injections of MA.
Mice selected for MA sensitization differed in false alarms, precue response rates (measures of behavioral inhibition), and also hits (measure of operant responding). Mice selected for MA consumption did not differ in measures of behavioral inhibition, though hits differed. When MA was administered prior to the task, false alarms, precue response rates, and hits decreased for mice from all selected lines. Female high drinking mice were particularly resistant to MA’s effects on hits, but not precue response rate or false alarms.
These data suggest a shared, but complex, genetic association between inhibition processes, general levels of operant responding, and MA sensitization or consumption.
KeywordsInhibition Go/no-go Behavioral sensitization Self-administration Selected lines Methamphetamine Impulsivity
- Loos M, Stall J, Schoffelmeer ANM, Smit A, Spijker S, Pattij T (2010) Inhibitory control and response latency differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in a go/no-go and 5-choice serial reaction time task and strain-specific responsivity to amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 214:216–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perone M (1999) Statistical inference in behavior analysis: experimental control is better. Behav Analyst 22:109–116Google Scholar
- Uhl GR, Elmer GI, Labuda MC, Pickens RW (1995) Genetic influences on drug abuse. In: Bloom F, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 1793–1806Google Scholar