Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 219, Issue 3, pp 823–834 | Cite as

Gβ5-RGS complexes are gatekeepers of hyperactivity involved in control of multiple neurotransmitter systems

  • Keqiang Xie
  • Shencheng Ge
  • Victoria E. Collins
  • Christy L. Haynes
  • Kenneth J. Renner
  • Robert L. Meisel
  • Rafael Lujan
  • Kirill A. MartemyanovEmail author
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

Our knowledge about genes involved in the control of basal motor activity that may contribute to the pathology of the hyperactivity disorders, e.g., attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is limited. Disruption of monoamine neurotransmitter signaling through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) is considered to be a major contributing factor to the etiology of the ADHD. Genetic association evidence and functional data suggest that regulators of G protein signaling proteins of the R7 family (R7 RGS) that form obligatory complexes with type 5 G protein beta subunit (Gβ5) and negatively regulate signaling downstream from monoamine GPCRs may play a role in controlling hyperactivity.

Methods

To test this hypothesis, we conducted behavioral, pharmacological, and neurochemical studies using a genetic mouse model that lacked Gβ5, a subunit essential for the expression of the entire R7 RGS family.

Results

Elimination of Gβ5-RGS complexes led to a striking level of hyperactivity that far exceeds activity levels previously observed in animal models. This hyperactivity was accompanied by motor learning deficits and paradoxical behavioral sensitization to a novel environment. Neurochemical studies indicated that Gβ5-RGS-deficient mice had higher sensitivity of inhibitory GPCR signaling and deficits in basal levels, release, and reuptake of dopamine. Surprisingly, pharmacological treatment with monoamine reuptake inhibitors failed to alter hyperactivity. In contrast, blockade of NMDA receptors reversed the expression of hyperactivity in Gβ5-RGS-deficient mice.

Conclusions

These findings establish that Gβ5-RGS complexes are critical regulators of monoamine-NMDA receptor signaling cross-talk and link these complexes to disorders that manifest as hyperactivity, impaired learning, and motor dysfunctions.

Keywords

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Basal ganglia Motor control Hyperactivity Synaptic transmission G protein-coupled receptors Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Ching-Kang Jason Chen (VCU) for providing Gβ5−/− mouse line and Dr. William Simonds (NIH) for the generous gift of anti-Gβ5 antibodies. This work was supported by NIH grants DA021743 (K.A.M.), DA026405 (K.A.M.), DA019921 (K.J.R.), and DA13680 (R.L.M.); McKnight Land-Grant Professorship award (K.A.M.), NSF 0921874 (K.J.R); grants from the Spanish Ministry Science and Innovation (BFU2009-08404/BFI and CONSOLIDER-Ingenio CSD2008-00005; RL); and Searle Scholars Award (C.L.H.).

Disclosure

The authors declare that except for the income received from the primary employers and NIH grants listed in the “Acknowledgements” section, no financial compensation has been received from any individual or corporate entity over the past 3 years of research or professional service that could be perceived as constituting a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

213_2011_2409_MOESM1_ESM.doc (262 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1 Pattern of ambulatory activities of mice in the open field. Movements of mice of both genotypes were tracked in the open field chamber for 180 min. Grid represents the position of the infrared beams. Beam crossings are represented by the red lines. Red circle is the position of the mouse at the end of tracking. Please note significantly greater activity of Gβ5−/− with preservation of the locomotor activity pattern (DOC 262 kb)
213_2011_2409_MOESM2_ESM.doc (162 kb)
Supplemental Figure 2 Time course of ambulatory activity following administration of mGluR2/3 agonist LY379628 in Gβ5−/− and Gβ5+/+ mice. Activity of mice was tracked in 5-min bins over 180 min following administration of the drug. LY379628 does not cause measurable inhibition of the locomotor activity in Gβ5+/+ mice. Following initial habituation, mice maintained low but consistent level of motor unaffected by the drug administration. In contrast, Gβ5−/− mice failed to exhibit habituation behavior, but their activity was strongly inhibited by the drug (DOC 161 kb)
213_2011_2409_MOESM3_ESM.doc (136 kb)
Supplemental Figure 3 Effects of amphetamine on activity of Gβ5−/− mice. Total distance travelled by wild-type Gβ5+/+ (n = 6) and Gβ5−/− (n = 6) mice was measured in the open field chamber for 3 h following i.p. amphetamine administration. ANOVA showed significant effect of amphetamine on activity of both Gβ5+/+ (F (2,15) = 92.085, p < 0.001) and Gβ5−/− mice (F (2,15) = 6.785, p < 0.01). Post hoc Tukey's test confirmed significant difference (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. saline control) where indicated. Error bars represent SEM values (DOC 135 kb)
213_2011_2409_MOESM4_ESM.doc (148 kb)
Supplemental Table 1 Tissue content of dopamine (DA) and its major metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) (DOC 148 kb)

References

  1. Allen-Brady K, Robison R, Cannon D, Varvil T, Villalobos M, Pingree C, Leppert MF, Miller J, McMahon WM, Coon H (2010) Genome-wide linkage in Utah autism pedigrees. Mol Psychiatry 15:1006–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson GR, Lujan R, Semenov A, Pravetoni M, Posokhova EN, Song JH, Uversky V, Chen CK, Wickman K, Martemyanov KA (2007) Expression and localization of RGS9-2/G 5/R7BP complex in vivo is set by dynamic control of its constitutive degradation by cellular cysteine proteases. J Neurosci 27:14117–14127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson GR, Posokhova E, Martemyanov KA (2009) The R7 RGS protein family: multi-subunit regulators of neuronal G protein signaling. Cell Biochem Biophys 54:33–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson GR, Cao Y, Davidson S, Truong HV, Pravetoni M, Thomas MJ, Wickman K, Giesler GJ Jr, Martemyanov KA (2010) R7BP complexes with RGS9-2 and RGS7 in the striatum differentially control motor learning and locomotor responses to cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:1040–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnsten AF (2009) Toward a new understanding of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pathophysiology: an important role for prefrontal cortex dysfunction. CNS Drugs 23(Suppl 1):33–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker SC, van der Meulen EM, Buitelaar JK, Sandkuijl LA, Pauls DL, Monsuur AJ, van't Slot R, Minderaa RB, Gunning WB, Pearson PL, Sinke RJ (2003) A whole-genome scan in 164 Dutch sib pairs with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: suggestive evidence for linkage on chromosomes 7p and 15q. Am J Hum Genet 72:1251–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Battaglia A (2005) The inv dup(15) or idic(15) syndrome: a clinically recognisable neurogenetic disorder. Brain Dev 27:365–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Battaglia A, Parrini B, Tancredi R (2010) The behavioral phenotype of the idic(15) syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C:448–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackmer T, Larsen EC, Takahashi M, Martin TF, Alford S, Hamm HE (2001) G protein betagamma subunit-mediated presynaptic inhibition: regulation of exocytotic fusion downstream of Ca2+ entry. Science 292:293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blundell J, Hoang CV, Potts B, Gold SJ, Powell CM (2008) Motor coordination deficits in mice lacking RGS9. Brain Res 1190:78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouhamdan M, Yan HD, Yan XH, Bannon MJ, Andrade R (2006) Brain-specific regulator of G-protein signaling 9–2 selectively interacts with alpha-actinin-2 to regulate calcium-dependent inactivation of NMDA receptors. J Neurosci 26:2522–2530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheever ML, Snyder JT, Gershburg S, Siderovski DP, Harden TK, Sondek J (2008) Crystal structure of the multifunctional Gbeta5-RGS9 complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:155–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen H, Lambert NA (2000) Endogenous regulators of G protein signaling proteins regulate presynaptic inhibition at rat hippocampal synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12810–12815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen CK, Eversole-Cire P, Zhang HK, Mancino V, Chen YJ, He W, Wensel TG, Simon MI (2003) Instability of GGL domain-containing RGS proteins in mice lacking the G protein beta-subunit Gb5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6604–6609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark D, White FJ (1987) D1 dopamine receptor—the search for a function: a critical evaluation of the D1/D2 dopamine receptor classification and its functional implications. Synapse 1:347–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. David HN, Ansseau M, Abraini JH (2005) Dopamine-glutamate reciprocal modulation of release and motor responses in the rat caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens of “intact” animals. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 50:336–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeLong MR, Wichmann T (2007) Circuits and circuit disorders of the basal ganglia. Arch Neurol 64:20–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Matteo V, Pierucci M, Esposito E, Crescimanno G, Benigno A, Di Giovanni G (2008) Serotonin modulation of the basal ganglia circuitry: therapeutic implication for Parkinson's disease and other motor disorders. Prog Brain Res 172:423–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diana G, Sagratella S (1994) Different capability of N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists to affect locomotor/exploratory activity of mice in a computerized on-line open field test. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:291–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Druhan JP, Rajabi H, Stewart J (1996) MK-801 increases locomotor activity without elevating extracellular dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens. Synapse 24:135–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faraone SV, Sergeant J, Gillberg C, Biederman J (2003) The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American condition? World Psychiatry 2:104–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Faraone SV, Perlis RH, Doyle AE, Smoller JW, Goralnick JJ, Holmgren MA, Sklar P (2005) Molecular genetics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57:1313–1323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faraone SV, Doyle AE, Lasky-Su J, Sklar PB, D'Angelo E, Gonzalez-Heydrich J, Kratochvil C, Mick E, Klein K, Rezac AJ, Biederman J (2008) Linkage analysis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B:1387–1391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farmer CJ, Isakson TR, Coy DJ, Renner KJ (1996) In vivo evidence for progesterone dependent decreases in serotonin release in the hypothalamus and midbrain central grey: relation to the induction of lordosis. Brain Res 711:84–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Findling RL, McNamara NK, Stansbrey RJ, Maxhimer R, Periclou A, Mann A, Graham SM (2007) A pilot evaluation of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and effectiveness of memantine in pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined type. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 17:19–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gainetdinov RR (2008) Dopamine transporter mutant mice in experimental neuropharmacology. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 377:301–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gainetdinov RR, Wetsel WC, Jones SR, Levin ED, Jaber M, Caron MG (1999) Role of serotonin in the paradoxical calming effect of psychostimulants on hyperactivity. Science 283:397–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gainetdinov RR, Mohn AR, Bohn LM, Caron MG (2001) Glutamatergic modulation of hyperactivity in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11047–11054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gainetdinov RR, Premont RT, Bohn LM, Lefkowitz RJ, Caron MG (2004) Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors and neuronal functions. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:107–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerfen CR, Engber TM, Mahan LC, Susel Z, Chase TN, Monsma FJ Jr, Sibley DR (1990) D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-regulated gene expression of striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons. Science 250:1429–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ginski MJ, Witkin JM (1994) Sensitive and rapid behavioral differentiation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 114:573–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giros B, Jaber M, Jones SR, Wightman RM, Caron MG (1996) Hyperlocomotion and indifference to cocaine and amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Nature 379:606–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graybiel AM (2000) The basal ganglia. Curr Biol 10:R509–R511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greengard P, Allen PB, Nairn AC (1999) Beyond the dopamine receptor: the DARPP-32/protein phosphatase-1 cascade. Neuron 23:435–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Groenewegen HJ (2003) The basal ganglia and motor control. Neural Plast 10:107–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Han J, Mark MD, Li X, Xie M, Waka S, Rettig J, Herlitze S (2006) RGS2 determines short-term synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons by regulating Gi/o-mediated inhibition of presynaptic Ca2+ channels. Neuron 51:575–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heal DJ, Cheetham SC, Smith SL (2009) The neuropharmacology of ADHD drugs in vivo: insights on efficacy and safety. Neuropharmacology 57:608–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hochstetler SE, Puopolo M, Gustincich S, Raviola E, Wightman RM (2000) Real-time amperometric measurements of zeptomole quantities of dopamine released from neurons. Anal Chem 72:489–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hollinger S, Hepler JR (2002) Cellular regulation of RGS proteins: modulators and integrators of G protein signaling. Pharmacol Rev 54:527–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hooks SB, Waldo GL, Corbitt J, Bodor ET, Krumins AM, Harden TK (2003) RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11 stimulate GTPase activity of Gi family G-proteins with differential selectivity and maximal activity. J Biol Chem 278:10087–10093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jensen V, Rinholm JE, Johansen TJ, Medin T, Storm-Mathisen J, Sagvolden T, Hvalby O, Bergersen LH (2009) N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit dysfunction at hippocampal glutamatergic synapses in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroscience 158:353–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirley A, Hawi Z, Daly G, McCarron M, Mullins C, Millar N, Waldman I, Fitzgerald M, Gill M (2002) Dopaminergic system genes in ADHD: toward a biological hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:607–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kovoor A, Seyffarth P, Ebert J, Barghshoon S, Chen CK, Schwarz S, Axelrod JD, Cheyette BN, Simon MI, Lester HA, Schwarz J (2005) D2 dopamine receptors colocalize regulator of G-protein signaling 9–2 (RGS9-2) via the RGS9 DEP domain, and RGS9 knock-out mice develop dyskinesias associated with dopamine pathways. J Neurosci 25:2157–2165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kreitzer AC, Malenka RC (2008) Striatal plasticity and basal ganglia circuit function. Neuron 60:543–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kristensen EW, Wilson RL, Wightman RM (1986) Dispersion in flow injection analysis measured with microvoltammetric electrodes. Anal Chem 58:986–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kristiansen K (2004) Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function. Pharmacol Ther 103:21–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liljequist S, Ossowska K, Grabowska-Anden M, Anden NE (1991) Effect of the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801, on locomotor activity and on the metabolism of dopamine in various brain areas of mice. Eur J Pharmacol 195:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu XY, Chu XP, Mao LM, Wang M, Lan HX, Li MH, Zhang GC, Parelkar NK, Fibuch EE, Haines M, Neve KA, Liu F, Xiong ZG, Wang JQ (2006) Modulation of D2R-NR2B interactions in response to cocaine. Neuron 52:897–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lujan R, Nusser Z, Roberts JD, Shigemoto R, Somogyi P (1996) Perisynaptic location of metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR1 and mGluR5 on dendrites and dendritic spines in the rat hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 8:1488–1500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mancuso JJ, Qian Y, Long C, Wu GY, Wensel TG (2010) Distribution of RGS9-2 in neurons of the mouse striatum. J Neurochem 112:651–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mazei-Robinson MS, Blakely RD (2006) ADHD and the dopamine transporter: are there reasons to pay attention? Handb Exp Pharmacol (175):373–415Google Scholar
  52. Missale C, Fiorentini C, Busi C, Collo G, Spano PF (2006) The NMDA/D1 receptor complex as a new target in drug development. Curr Top Med Chem 6:801–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murray MJ (2010) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the context of autism spectrum disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 12:382–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nayate A, Bradshaw JL, Rinehart NJ (2005) Autism and Asperger's disorder: are they movement disorders involving the cerebellum and/or basal ganglia? Brain Res Bull 67:327–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nijmeijer JS, Arias-Vasquez A, Rommelse NN, Altink ME, Anney RJ, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Buschgens CJ, Fliers EA, Gill M, Minderaa RB, Poustka L, Sergeant JA, Buitelaar JK, Franke B, Ebstein RP, Miranda A, Mulas F, Oades RD, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Steinhausen HC, Faraone SV, Hartman CA, Hoekstra PJ (2010) Identifying loci for the overlap between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder using a genome-wide QTL linkage approach. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 49:675–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Oades RD (2008) Dopamine-serotonin interactions in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Prog Brain Res 172:543–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Offermanns S (2003) G-proteins as transducers in transmembrane signalling. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 83:101–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pliszka SR (2007) Pharmacologic treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: efficacy, safety and mechanisms of action. Neuropsychol Rev 17:61–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Porter MY, Xie K, Pozharski E, Koelle MR, Martemyanov KA (2010) A conserved protein interaction interface on the type 5 G protein beta subunit controls proteolytic stability and activity of R7 family regulator of G protein signaling proteins. J Biol Chem 285:41100–41112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Prince J (2008) Catecholamine dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an update. J Clin Psychopharmacol 28:S39–S45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahman Z, Schwarz J, Gold SJ, Zachariou V, Wein MN, Choi KH, Kovoor A, Chen CK, DiLeone RJ, Schwarz SC, Selley DE, Sim-Selley LJ, Barrot M, Luedtke RR, Self D, Neve RL, Lester HA, Simon MI, Nestler EJ (2003) RGS9 modulates dopamine signaling in the basal ganglia. Neuron 38:941–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Renner KJ, Krey LC, Luine VN (1987) Effect of progesterone on monoamine turnover in the brain of the estrogen-primed rat. Brain Res Bull 19:195–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rommelse NN, Franke B, Geurts HM, Hartman CA, Buitelaar JK (2010) Shared heritability of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19:281–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ruano D, Abecasis GR, Glaser B, Lips ES, Cornelisse LN, de Jong AP, Evans DM, Davey Smith G, Timpson NJ, Smit AB, Heutink P, Verhage M, Posthuma D (2010) Functional gene group analysis reveals a role of synaptic heterotrimeric G proteins in cognitive ability. Am J Hum Genet 86:113–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shen EH, Phillips TJ (1998) MK-801 potentiates ethanol's effects on locomotor activity in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 59:135–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stahl SM (2010) Mechanism of action of stimulants in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 71:12–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tripp G, Wickens JR (2009) Neurobiology of ADHD. Neuropharmacology 57:579–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Viggiano D (2008) The hyperactive syndrome: metanalysis of genetic alterations, pharmacological treatments and brain lesions which increase locomotor activity. Behav Brain Res 194:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang X, Zhong P, Gu Z, Yan Z (2003) Regulation of NMDA receptors by dopamine D4 signaling in prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 23:9852–9861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987) A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94:469–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xie K, Allen KL, Kourrich S, Colon-Saez J, Thomas MJ, Wickman K, Martemyanov KA (2010) Gbeta5 recruits R7 RGS proteins to GIRK channels to regulate the timing of neuronal inhibitory signaling. Nat Neurosci 13:661–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zachariou V, Georgescu D, Sanchez N, Rahman Z, DiLeone R, Berton O, Neve RL, Sim-Selley LJ, Selley DE, Gold SJ, Nestler EJ (2003) Essential role for RGS9 in opiate action. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13656–13661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang JH, Lai ZN, Simonds WF (2000) Differential expression of the G protein *5 gene: analysis of mouse brain, peripheral tissues, and cultured cell lines. J Neurochem 75:393–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhou QY, Palmiter RD (1995) Dopamine-deficient mice are severely hypoactive, adipsic, and aphagic. Cell 83:1197–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhuang X, Oosting RS, Jones SR, Gainetdinov RR, Miller GW, Caron MG, Hen R (2001) Hyperactivity and impaired response habituation in hyperdopaminergic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1982–1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zigmond MJ, Stricker EM (1989) Animal models of parkinsonism using selective neurotoxins: clinical and basic implications. Int Rev Neurobiol 31:1–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keqiang Xie
    • 1
  • Shencheng Ge
    • 3
  • Victoria E. Collins
    • 4
  • Christy L. Haynes
    • 3
  • Kenneth J. Renner
    • 4
  • Robert L. Meisel
    • 2
  • Rafael Lujan
    • 5
  • Kirill A. Martemyanov
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PharmacologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  5. 5.Departamento de Ciencias Médicas, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de Castilla-La ManchaAlbaceteSpain
  6. 6.Department of NeuroscienceThe Scripps Research InstituteJupiterUSA

Personalised recommendations