, Volume 207, Issue 3, pp 391–400 | Cite as

Extended access to amphetamine self-administration increases impulsive choice in a delay discounting task in rats

Original Investigation



d-Amphetamine (AMPH) is a widely prescribed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication, but little is known about its effects on impulsive choice with escalated use.


The current study examined the effects of short and long access to AMPH self-administration on impulsive choice in a delay discounting task in which rats chose between a small immediate reward (one sucrose pellet immediately) and a larger delayed reward (three sucrose pellets after an adjusting delay).


Following choice stability in delay discounting, all rats received 15 1-h sessions of AMPH self-administration (0.1 or 0.03 mg/kg/infusion); self-administration sessions began 45 min after each delay discounting session. Rats were then either maintained on the short access (ShA) self-administration session or were switched to a long access (LgA) 6-h session for 21 days, followed by a 7-day withdrawal phase in which only the delay discounting task continued.


LgA rats in the 0.03 mg/kg/infusion dose group escalated in total number of infusions across sessions, although rats in the 0.1 mg/kg/infusion dose group did not. LgA groups at both unit doses showed decreased mean adjusted delays across sessions compared to the ShA groups, indicating that long access to AMPH increases impulsive choice. During the AMPH withdrawal phase, LgA groups returned back to baseline mean adjusted delays, indicating that the effect on impulsive choice was reversible.


These results show that extended AMPH self-administration produces a transient loss of inhibitory control, which may play a role in the escalating pattern of drug intake that characterizes the addiction process.


Delay discounting d-Amphetamine Escalation Impulsivity 



Supported by NIH grants P50 DA05312 and T32 DA007304.


  1. Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1998) Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1999) Long-lasting increase in the set point for cocaine self-administration after escalation in rats. Psychopharmacology 146:303–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed SH, Koob GF (2004) Changes in response to a dopamine receptor antagonist in rats with escalating cocaine intake. Psychopharmacology 172:450–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed SH, Koob GF (2005) Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function. Psychopharmacology 180:473–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmed SH, Walker JR, Koob GF (2000) Persistent increase in the motivation to take heroin in rats with a history of drug escalation. Neuropsychopharmacology 22:413–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed SH, Lin D, Koob GF, Parsons LH (2003) Escalation of cocaine self-administration does not depend on altered cocaine-induced nucleus accumbens dopamine levels. J Neurochem 86:102–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen RM, Dykstra LA, Carelli RM (2007) Continuous exposure to the competitive N-methyl-D aspartate receptor antagonist, LY235959, facilitates escalation of cocaine consumption in Sprague–Dawley rats. Psychopharmacology 191:341–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Berman SM, Kuczenski R, McCracken JT, London ED (2000) Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review. Mol Psychiatry 14:123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:447–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Biederman J, Wilens T, Mick E, Spencer T, Faraone SV (1999) Pharmacotherapy of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder reduces risk for substance use disorder. Pediatrics 104:e20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabeza de Vaca S, Carr KD (1998) Food restriction enhances the central rewarding effect of abused drugs. J Neurosci 18:7502–7510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll ME, Meisch RA (1984) Increased drug-reinforced behavior due to food deprivation. In: Thompson T, Dews PB, Barrett JE (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology. Academic, New York, pp 47–88Google Scholar
  13. Coffey SF, Gudleski GD, Saladin ME, Brady KT (2003) Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacology 11:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dallery J, Locey ML (2005) Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats. Behav Pharmacol 16:15–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. de Wit H (2009) Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addiction Biol 14:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-Amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworkin SI, Porrino LJ, Smith JE (1992) Importance of behavioral controls in the analysis of ongoing events. Neurological Approaches to Brain-Behavior Interactions, NIDA Res Monogr 124:173–188Google Scholar
  18. Evans KR, Vaccarino FJ (1987) Effects of d- and 1-amphetamine on food intake: evidence for a dopaminergic substrate. Pharmal Biochem Behav 27:649–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evenden JL, Ryan CN (1996) The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 128:161–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grasing K, Szeto H (1993) EEG changes with different levels of morphine self-administration. Neuropharmacology 32:543–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD, Slevin JR, Estle SJ (2004) Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect? J Exp Anal Behav 81:39–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobs EH, Smit AB, de Vries TJ, Schoffelmeer ANM (2003) Neuroadaptive effects of active versus passive drug administration in addiction research. Trends Pharmacol Sci 24:566–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitamura O, Wee S, Specio SE, Koob GF, Pulvirenti L (2006) Escalation of methamphetamine self-administration in rats: a dose-effect function. Psychopharmacology 186:48–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koob GF, Kreek MJ (2007) Stress, dysregulation of drug reward pathways, and the transition to drug dependence. Am J Psychiatry 164:1149–1159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lambert NM, Hartsough CS (1998) Prospective study of tobacco smoking and substance dependencies among samples of ADHD and non-ADHD participants. J Learn Disabil 31:533–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Logue AW, Peña-Correal TE, Rodriguez ML, Kabela E (1986) Self control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay. J Exp Anal Behav 46:159–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mandyam C, Wee S, Eisch AJ, Richardson HN, Koob GF (2007) Methamphetamine self administration and voluntary exercise have opposing effects on medial prefrontal cortex gliosis. J Neurosci 27:11442–11450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mandyam C, Wee S, Crawford E, Eisch A, Richardson H, Koob GF (2008) Varied access to intravenous methamphetamine self-administration differentially alters adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Biol Psychiatry 64:958–965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazur JE, Logue AW (1978) Choice in a “self-control” paradigm: Effects of a fading procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 30:11–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Perry JL, Stairs DJ, Bardo MT (2008) Impulsive choice and environmental enrichment: effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate. Behav Brain Res 193:48–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Reynolds B (2006) A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behav Pharmacol 17:651–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Robbins TW (2002) ADHD and addiction. Nature Medicine 8:24–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sills TL, Vaccarino FJ (1996) Individual differences in sugar consumption following systemic or intraaccumbens administration of low doses of amphetamine in nondeprived rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 54:665–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith JE, Dworkin SI (1986) Neurobiological substrates of drug self-administration. In: Brown RM, Clouet D (eds) Opiate receptor subtypes and brain function. NIDA Res Monogr 71:127–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanis JJ, Avila HM, White MD, Gulley JM (2008) Dissociation between long-lasting behavioral sensitization to d-amphetamine and impulsive choice in rats performing a delay-discounting task. Psychopharmacology 199:539–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vitiello B (2001) Long-term effects of stimulant medications on the brain: possible relevance to the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 11:25–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Volkow ND, Chang L, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Franceschi D, Sedler M, Gatley SJ, Miller E, Hitzemann R, Ding YS, Logan J (2001) Loss of dopamine transporters in methamphetamine abusers recovers with protracted abstinence. J Neurosci 21:9414–9418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wade TR, deWit H, Richards JB (2000) Effects of dopaminergic drugs on delayed rewards as a measure of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 15:90–101Google Scholar
  39. Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Chang L, Miller E, Sedler M, Hitzemann R, Zhu W, Logan J, Ma Y, Fowler JS (2004) Partial recovery of brain metabolism in methamphetamine abusers after protracted abstinence. Am J Psychiatry 161:242–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR (2001) The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers Individ Differ 30:669–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilens TE, Spencer TJ, Biederman J (2001) A review of the pharmacotherapy of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Atten Disord 5:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilens TE, Faraone SV, Biederman J, Gunawardene S (2003) Does stimulant therapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder beget later substance abuse? A meta-analytic review of the literature. Pediatrics 111:179–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations