, 207:325

A verification of previously identified QTLs for cocaine-induced activation using a panel of B6.A chromosome substitution strains (CSS) and A/J x C57Bl/6J F2 mice

Original Investigation



The objective of this study was to confirm provisional quantitative trait loci (QTL) for cocaine-induced locomotor activation, on chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, and 18, previously identified in the AXB/BXA recombinant inbred (RI) and AcB/BcA recombinant congenic (RC) strains of mice derived from A/J (A) and C57BL/6J (B6) progenitors. This was accomplished through a genetic analysis of cocaine-induced activity in an AxB6 F2 cross and a phenotypic survey across a panel of B6.A chromosome substitution strains (CSS) mice. Mice were tested for cocaine-induced activity, following administration of saline and cocaine (20 mg/kg), utilizing an open-field procedure.


Among AxB6 F2 mice, differences in cocaine-induced activity were associated with loci on chromosome 1 (D1Mit305), 5 (D5Mit409), 16 (D16Mit131), and 18 (D18Mit189). A survey of the CSS panel confirmed cocaine QTLs on chromosomes 5 and 15, previously identified in RI or RC strains. Overall, the regions on chromosomes 5 and 18 represent verification of QTL previously identified in both the RC and RI strains. Additionally, the B6 allele for these QTL was consistently associated with greater relative cocaine activation.


Collectively, chromosome 5 and 18 QTL have now been replicated in multiple independent crosses derived from the A/J and C57BL/6J progenitors. The use of an in silico analysis highlighted potential candidate genes on chromosomes 5 and 18. The present results complement the targeted gene approach currently prevalent in the study of cocaine and provide a broader empirically based focus for subsequent candidate gene studies.


Cocaine F2 CSS QTL Activity Mice 


  1. Ammons AD, Hunt GJ (2008) Identification of quantitative trait loci and candidate genes influencing ethanol sensitivity in honey bees. Behav Genet 38(5):531–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barallobre MJ, Pascual M, Del Río JA, Soriano E (2005) The Netrin family of guidance factors: emphasis on Netrin-1 signalling. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 49(1):22–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Belknap JK (2003) Chromosome substitution strains: some quantitative considerations for genome scans and fine mapping. Mamm Genome 14(11):723–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Belknap JK, Mitchell SR, O’Toole LA, Helms ML, Crabbe JC (1996) Type l and type ll error rates for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies using recombinant inbred mouse strains. Behav Genet 26:149–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett B, Carosone-Link P, Beeson M, Gordon L, Phares-Zook N, Johnson TE (2008) Genetic dissection of quantitative trait locus for ethanol sensitivity in long- and short-sleep mice. Genes Brain Behav 7(6):659–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boone EM, Hawks BW, Li W, Garlow SJ (2008) Genetic regulation of hypothalamic cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) in BxD inbred mice. Brain Res 1194:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyle AE, Gill K (2001) Sensitivity of AXB/BXA recombinant inbred lines of mice to the locomotor activating effects of cocaine: a quantitative trait loci analysis. Pharmacogenetics 11(3):255–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunk I, Blex C, Sanchis-Segura C, Sternberg J, Perreau-Lenz S, Bilbao A, Hörtnagl H, Baron J, Juranek J, Laube G, Birnbaumer L, Spanagel R, Ahnert-Hilger G (2008) Deletion of Go2alpha abolishes cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization by disturbing the striatal dopamine system. FASEB J 22(10):3736–3746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryant CD, Chang HP, Zhang J, Wiltshire T, Tarantino LM, Palmer AA (2009) A major QTL on chromosome 11 influences psychostimulant and opioid sensitivity in mice. Genes Brain Behav (in press). doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00525.x
  10. DiPetrillo K, Wang X, Stylianou IM, Paigen B (2005) Bioinformatics toolbox for narrowing rodent quantitative trait loci. Trends Genet 21(12):683–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle GA, Furlong PJ, Schwebel CL, Smith GG, Lohoff FW, Buono RJ, Berrettini WH, Ferraro TN (2008) Fine mapping of a major QTL influencing morphine preference in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice using congenic strains. Neuropsychopharmacology 33(12):2801–2809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudek BC, Underwood KA (1993) Selective breeding, congenic strains, and other classical genetic approaches to the analysis of alcohol-related polygenic pleiotropisms. Behav Genet 23:179–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Flint J, Valdar W, Shifman S, Mott R (2005) Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents. Nat Rev Genet 6(4):271–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Flores C, Manitt C, Rodaros D, Thompson KM, Rajabi H, Luk KC, Tritsch NX, Sadikot AF, Stewart J, Kennedy TE (2005) Netrin receptor deficient mice exhibit functional reorganization of dopaminergic systems and do not sensitize to amphetamine. Mol Psychiatry 10(6):606–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. George FR, Ritz C (1990) Cocaine produces locomotor stimulation in SS but not LS mice: relationship to dopaminergic function. Psychopharmacology 101:18–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gill KJ, Boyle AE (2003) Confirmation of quantitative trait loci for cocaine-induced activation in the AcB/BcA series of recombinant congenic strains. Pharmacogenetics 13(6):329–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill KJ, Boyle AE (2008) Genetic influences on drug-induced psychomotor activation in mice. Genes Brain Behav 7(8):859–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Grant A, Hoops D, Labelle-Dumais C, Prévost M, Rajabi H, Kolb B, Stewart J, Arvanitogiannis A, Flores C (2007) Netrin-1 receptor-deficient mice show enhanced mesocortical dopamine transmission and blunted behavioural responses to amphetamine. Eur J NeuroSci 26(11):3215–3228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hitzemann R, Edmunds S, Wu W, Malmanger B, Walter N, Belknap J, Darakjian P, McWeeney S (2008) Detection of reciprocal quantitative trait loci for acute ethanol withdrawal and ethanol consumption in heterogeneous stock mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 203(4):713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofstetter JR, Zhang A, Mayeda AR, Guscar T, Nurnberger JI Jr et al (1997) Genomic DNA from mice: a comparison of recovery methods and tissue sources. Biochem Mol Med 62(2):197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Imbesi M, Yildiz S, Dirim Arslan A, Sharma R, Manev H, Uz T (2009) Dopamine receptor-mediated regulation of neuronal “clock” gene expression. Neuroscience 158(2):537–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Janowsky A, Mah C, Johnson RA, Cunningham CL, Phillips TJ, Crabbe JC, Eshleman AJ, Belknap JK (2001) Mapping genes that regulate density of dopamine transporters and correlated behaviors in recombinant inbred mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:634–643PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones BC, Tarantino LM, Rodriguez LA, Reed CL, McClearn GE, Plomin R, Erwin VG (1999) Quantitative-trait loci analysis of cocaine-related behaviors and neurochemistry. Pharmacogenetics 9:607–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koob GF, Le Moal M (2008) Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annu Rev Psychol 59:29–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lander ES, Kruglyak L (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11:241–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Leshner AI, Koob GF (1999) Drugs of abuse and the brain. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 111(2):99–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Leussis MP, Frayne ML, Saito M, Berry EM, Aldinger KA, Rockwell GN, Hammer RP Jr, Baskin-Hill AE, Singer JB, Nadeau JH, Sklar P, Petryshen TL (2009) Genomic survey of prepulse inhibition in mouse chromosome substitution strains. Genes Brain Behav (in press). doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00526.x
  28. Mackiewicz M, Paigen B, Naidoo N, Pack AI (2008) Analysis of the QTL for sleep homeostasis in mice: Homer1a is a likely candidate. Physiol Genomics 33(1):91–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Manly DK, Cudmore RH, Meer JM (2001) Map manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 12:930–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McClearn GE, Tarantino LM, Rodriguez LA, Jones BC, Bizard DA, Plomin R (1997) Genotypic selection provides experimental confirmation for an alcohol consumption quantitative trait locus in mouse. Mol Psychiatry 2(6):486–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Miner LL, Marley RJ (1995) Chromosomal mapping of the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in BXD recombinant inbred strains of mice. Psychopharmacology 122:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) (2009) The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME. Available at:
  33. Mouse Phenome Database (MPD) (2009) Available at:
  34. Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Matin A, Lander ES (2000) Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet 24(3):221–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips TJ, Belknap JK, Buck KJ, Cunningham CL (1998) Genes on mouse chromosomes 2 and 9 determine variation in ethanol consumption. Mamm Genome 9:936–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pulipparacharuvil S, Renthal W, Hale CF, Taniguchi M, Xiao G, Kumar A, Russo SJ, Sikder D, Dewey CM, Davis MM, Greengard P, Nairn AC, Nestler EJ, Cowan CW (2008) Cocaine regulates MEF2 to control synaptic and behavioral plasticity. Neuron 59(4):621–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Radcliffe RA, Bludeau P, Deng XS, Erwin VG, Deitrich RA (2007) Short-term selection for acute ethanol tolerance and sensitization from an F2 population derived from the high and low alcohol-sensitive selectively bred rat lines. Alcohol 41(8):557–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shao H, Burrage LC, Sinasac DS, Hill AE, Ernest SR, O’Brien W, Courtland HW, Jepsen KJ, Kirby A, Kulbokas EJ, Daly MJ, Broman KW, Lander ES, Nadeau JH (2008) Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 16,105(50):19910–19914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shuster L, Yu G, Bates A (1977) Sensitization to cocaine stimulation in mice. Psychopharmacology 52:185–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Singer JB, Hill AE, Burrage LC, Olszens KR, Song J, Justice M et al (2004) Genetic dissection of complex traits with chromosome substitution strains of mice. Science 304:445–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tolliver BK, Belknap JK, Woods WE, Carney JM (1994) Genetic analysis of sensitization and tolerance to cocaine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270:1230–1238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng Z-B (2006) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  43. Youngren KK, Nadeau JH, Matin A (2003) Testicular cancer susceptibility in the 129.MOLF-Chr19 mouse strain: additive effects, gene interactions and epigenetic modifications. Hum Mol Genet 12:389–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryResearch Institute, McGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Addictions UnitMcGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations