Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers
Dependent smokers exhibit deficits in attentional and memory processes when smoking abstinent as compared to when satiated. While nicotine replacement therapy improves attention during abstinence, it is unclear whether this is due to the alleviation of withdrawal-related deficits or inherent beneficial effects of nicotine.
The primary aim of these studies was to test whether nicotine exerts a beneficial effect on novelty detection and whether such effects occur in nonsmokers as well as habitual smokers.
Materials and methods
In two parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 24 smokers (study 1) and 24 nonsmokers (study 2) were tested in two counterbalanced sessions: once while wearing a nicotine patch (smokers = 14 mg; nonsmokers = 7 mg) and once while wearing a placebo patch. On each day, participants performed three content-specific oddball tasks (perceptual, semantic, and emotional) that required them to press a button whenever they saw a novel target (20% of stimuli) embedded in a stream of common nontarget stimuli (80% of stimuli). Recognition memory for targets was subsequently tested. Reports of mood, smoking withdrawal, patch side effects, and blind success were collected in each session.
Among smokers, compared to placebo, nicotine decreased target reaction time during all oddball tasks. Among nonsmokers, nicotine increased target detection accuracy and subsequent memory recognition. Nicotine’s enhancement on each respective measure was not task-content specific in either sample.
These data suggest that acute nicotine administration may exert direct beneficial effects on novelty detection and subsequent memory recognition in both smokers and nonsmokers. Moreover, these effects are not content-specific.
KeywordsNicotine Smoking Nonsmoker Smoker Novelty Memory Cognition Dopaminergic Human
- Andreassi JL (2000) Psychophysiology human behavior and physiological response, 4th edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
- Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1999) Affective norms for English words (ANEW): instruction manual and affective ratings. In: F. U. o. F. Gainesville, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology (ed.)Google Scholar
- Gilbert DG, Rabinovich N, Rosenberger SR (2003) Effects of fast and slow blood-rise nicotine patches on nausea and feeling states in never-smokers. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert DG, McClernon J, Rabinovich N, Sugai C, Plath L, Asgaard G et al (2004) Effects of quitting smoking on EEG activation and attention last for more than 31 days and are more severe with stress, dependence, DRD2 A1 allele, and depressive traits. Nicotine Tob Res 6(2):249–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kucera H, Francis WN (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
- Scoville WB, Milner B (1957) Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurochem 20(1):11–21Google Scholar
- Sokolov EN (1963) Perception and the conditioned reflex. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Spielberger CD (1986) Psychological determinants of smoking behavior. In: Tollinson RD (ed) Smoking and society: toward a more balanced assessment. Heath, Lexington, MAGoogle Scholar
- Tulving E, Kroll N (1995) Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term-memory encoding. Annu Rev Neurosci 2(3):387–390Google Scholar