Enhancement of suggestibility and imaginative ability with nitrous oxide
- 196 Downloads
Imaginative suggestibility, a trait closely related to hypnotic suggestibility, is modifiable under some circumstances. Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is commonly used for sedation in dentistry and is reported to be more effective when combined with appropriate suggestions.
The aim of this study was to determine whether nitrous oxide inhalation alters imaginative suggestibility and imagery vividness.
Thirty participants were tested twice in a within-subjects design, once during inhalation of 25% nitrous oxide and once during inhalation of air plus oxygen. Before the study, participants’ expectancies regarding the effects of nitrous oxide were assessed. Participants were blinded to drug administration. During each session, participants were verbally administered detailed measures of imagination and suggestibility: the Sheehan–Betts Quality of Mental Imagery scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale Form C, minus the hypnotic induction.
Imaginative suggestibility and imaginative ability (imagery vividness) were both elevated in the nitrous oxide condition. This effect was unrelated to participants’ expectations regarding the effects of the drug.
Nitrous oxide increased imaginative suggestibility and imaginative ability. Possible explanations of these findings are discussed with respect to the effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists and to other pharmacological effects upon suggestibility and imagination.
KeywordsSuggestibility Nitrous oxide Imagination Imaginative ability Imagery Hypnosis Hypnotisability Suggestion Vividness NMDA
The authors would like to thank David Oakley, Irving Kirsch, and Celia Morgan for their helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.
- Bertrand LD (1989) The assessment and modification of hypnotic susceptibility. In: Spanos NP, Chaves JF (eds) Hypnosis: the cognitive–behavioral perspective. Prometheus Books, Buffalo (NY), pp 18–31Google Scholar
- Betts GH (1909) The distribution and functions of mental imagery. Teachers College, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brown RJ, Oakley DA (2004) An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotisability. In: Heap M, Brown RJ, Oakley DA (eds) The highly hypnotizable person. Routledge, London, pp 152–186Google Scholar
- Cass N, Cass L (1994) Pharmacology for anaesthetists. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- de Groh M (1989) Correlates of hypnotic susceptibility. In: Spanos NP, Chaves JF (eds) Hypnosis: the cognitive–behavioural perspective. Prometheus, Buffalo, NY, pp 32–63Google Scholar
- Dienes Z, Perner J (2007) Executive control without conscious awareness: the cold control theory of hypnosis. In: Jamieson GA (ed) Hypnosis and conscious states. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Eysenck HJ, Rees WL (1945) States of heightened suggestibility: narcosis. J Ment Sci 91:301–310Google Scholar
- Gorasini DR (2004) Enhancing hypotisability. In: Heap M, Brown RJ, Oakley DA (eds) The highly hypnotizable person. Routledge, London, pp 213–239Google Scholar
- Gorassini DR, Spanos NP (1989) The Carleton Skill Training Programme for modifying hypnotic suggestibility: original version and variations. In: Kirsch I, Capafons A, Amigó S, Cardeña-Buelna E (eds) Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation therapy: a cognitive–behavioural perspective. American Psychological Association Books, Washington, DC, pp 141–77Google Scholar
- Hilgard ER (1986) Divided consciousness: multiple controls in human thought and action (expanded edition). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hilgard ER, Hilgard JR (1975) Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Brunner/Mazel, Levittown, PAGoogle Scholar
- Kihlstrom JF (2007) Modified version of the SHSS:C. Retrieved September 30th, 2008, from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/PDFfiles/Hypnotizability/SHSSC%20Script.pdf
- Lippe HT (1944) Nitrous oxide analgesia in cavity preparation. Temple Dental Review 14:7Google Scholar
- Ott U (2007) States of absorption: in search of neurobiological foundations. In: Jamieson GA (ed) Hypnosis and conscious states. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Pekala RJ, Kumar VK (2007) An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: with particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In: Jamieson GA (ed) Hypnosis and conscious states. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Perry C, Nadon R, Button J (1992) The measurement of hypnotic ability. In: Fromm E, Nash M (eds) Contemporary hypnosis research. Guilford, New York, pp 459–490Google Scholar
- Seladin HM (1947) Practical anesthesia for dentistry and oral surgery. Lea & Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Shor RE, Orne EC (1962) Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Form A. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Simons D, Potter C, Temple G (2007) Hypnosis and communication in dental practice. Quintessence, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Spanos NP (1986) Hypnosis and the modification of hypnotic susceptibility: a social psychological perspective. In: Naish P (ed) What is hypnosis? Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 85–120Google Scholar
- Vickery AR, Kirsch I (1991) The effects of brief expectancy manipulations on hypnotic responsiveness. Contemp Hypn 8:167–171Google Scholar
- Walker DJ, Zacny JP (2005) Subjective effects of nitrous oxide. In: Earlywine M (ed) Mind-altering drugs: the science of subjective experience. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER (1959) Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
- Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER (1962) Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Form C. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
- Westcott TB, Rosenstock E (1976) Reliability of two measures of imagery. Percept Mot Skills 42:1037–1038Google Scholar