Psychopharmacology

, Volume 201, Issue 2, pp 249–260 | Cite as

Parametric analysis of the development and expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in female Swiss mice: effects of dose, injection schedule, and test context

  • Vincent Didone
  • Caroline Quoilin
  • Ezio Tirelli
  • Etienne Quertemont
Original Investigation
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Rationale

Repeated administrations of ethanol induce a progressive and enduring increase in its locomotor stimulant effects, a phenomenon termed behavioral sensitization that has not been systematically characterized.

Objective

The aim of the present studies was to characterize the development and expression of ethanol sensitization in female Swiss mice by examining (1) the doses of ethanol that induce behavioral sensitization, (2) the doses of acute ethanol challenges that are necessary to express behavioral sensitization, (3) the effects of the intervals between administrations, and (4) the context dependency of ethanol sensitization.

Materials and methods

Mice were i.p. injected for 8 days with various ethanol doses, and locomotion was recorded for 5 min. Two days after the last sensitization session, ethanol sensitization was tested in 30-min test sessions.

Results

Mice repeatedly injected with 2.5 g/kg ethanol showed a progressive (200–300%) increase in locomotor activity. In response to a 2.5 g/kg ethanol challenge, the mice repeatedly treated with doses above 1.5 g/kg showed a significant sensitization. Following the induction of sensitization with the maximally effective sensitizing dose (2.5 g/kg), mice showed greater activation after challenges with 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 g/kg ethanol. The intervals (24, 48, or 96 h) between ethanol injections did not affect the induction or expression of sensitization. Finally, sensitization to 2.5 g/kg ethanol was expressed regardless of the context in which it was induced.

Conclusions

Female Swiss mice develop a robust context-independent sensitization after repeated ethanol injections at all doses above 1.5 g/kg, including highly sedative doses such as 4 g/kg.

Keywords

Ethanol Behavioral sensitization Locomotor activity Mice 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) and the Fonds Spéciaux pour la Recherche de l’Université de Liège obtained by Etienne Quertemont.

References

  1. Boehm SL, Goldfarb KJ, Serio KM, Moore EM, Linsenbardt DN (2008) Does context influence the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol in female DBA/2J mice? Psychopharmacology 197:191–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broadbent J, Harless WE (1999) Differential effects of GABAA and GABAB agonists on sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology 141:197–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadbent J, Weitemier AZ (1999) Dizocilpine (MK-801) prevents the development of sensitization to ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Alcohol Alcohol 34:283–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Broadbent J, Kampmueller KM, Koonse SA (2005) Role of dopamine in behavioral sensitization to ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Alcohol 35:137–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuck TL, McLaughlin PJ, Arizzi-Lafrance MN, Salamone JD, Correa M (2006) Comparison between multiple behavioral effects of peripheral ethanol administration in rats: sedation, ataxia and bradykinesia. Life Sci 79:154–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Correa M, Arizzi MN, Betz A, Mingote S, Salamone JD (2003) Locomotor stimulant effects of intraventricular injections of low doses of ethanol in rats: acute and repeated administration. Psychopharmacology 170:368–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crabbe JC (1983) Sensitivity to ethanol in inbred mice: genotypic correlations among several behavioral responses. Behav Neurosci 97:280–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crombag HS, Badiani A, Maren S, Robinson TE (2000) The role of contextual versus discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 116:1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham CL, Noble D (1992) Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: role in sensitization and conditioned place preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43:307–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dudek BC, Phillips TJ (1990) Distinctions among sedative, disinhibitory, and ataxic properties of ethanol in inbred and selectively bred mice. Psychopharmacology 101:93–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fish EW, DeBold JF, Miczek KA (2002) Repeated alcohol: behavioral sensitization and alcohol-heightened aggression in mice. Psychopharmacology 160:39–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frye GD, Breese GR (1981) An evaluation of the locomotor stimulating action of ethanol in rats and mice. Psychopharmacology 75:372–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giknis MLA, Damjanov I (1984) Time interval between sequential exposures to ethanol is critical for the development of neural tolerance or sensitivity. Psychopharmacology 82:229–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein DB (1983) Pharmacology of alcohol. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Grahame NJ, Rodd-Henricks K, Li TK, Lumeng L (2000) Ethanol locomotor sensitization, but not tolerance correlates with selection for alcohol preference in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice. Psychopharmacology 151:252–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Hemby SE, Justice JB (1993) Environmental and pharmacological sensitization: effects of repeated administration of systemic or intra-nucleus accumbens cocaine. Psychopharmacology 111:109–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King TS, Chinchilli VM (2001) Robust estimators of the concordance correlation coefficient. J Biopharm Stat 11:83–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirk RE (1995) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  19. Lessov CN, Phillips TJ (1998) Duration of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology 135:374–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lessov CN, Risinger FO, Phillips TJ (2001) Attenuation of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in mice sensitized to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol. Behav Neurosci 115:146–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masur J, Oliveira de Souza ML, Zwicker AP (1986) The excitatory effect of ethanol: absence in rats, no tolerance and increased sensitivity in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:1225–1228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer PJ, Phillips TJ (2007) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol does not result in cross-sensitization to NMDA receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology 195:103–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer PJ, Palmer AA, McKinnon CS, Phillips TJ (2005) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol is modulated by environmental conditions, but is not associated with cross-sensitization to allopregnanolone or pentobarbital in DBA/2J mice. Neuroscience 131:263–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paivarinta P, Korpi ER (1993) Voluntary ethanol drinking increases locomotor activity in alcohol-preferring AA rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44:127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips TJ (1997) Behavior genetics of drug sensitization. Crit Rev Neurobiol 11:21–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips TJ, Lessov CN, Harland RD, Mitchell SR (1996) Evaluation of potential genetic associations between ethanol tolerance and sensitization in BXD/Ty recombinant inbred mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:613–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Quadros IMH, Hipolide DC, Frussa-Filho R, De Lucca EM, Nobrega JN, Souza-Formigoni MLO (2002) Resistance to ethanol sensitization is associated with increased NMDA receptor binding in specific brain areas. Eur J Pharmacol 442:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quadros IMH, Souza-Formigoni MLO, Fornari RV, Nobrega JN, Oliveira MGM (2003) Is behavioral sensitization to ethanol associated with contextual conditioning in mice? Behav Pharmacol 14:129–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Randall CL, Carpenter JA, Lester D, Friedman HJ (1975) Ethanol-induced mouse strain differences in locomotor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:533–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reid MS, Ho LB, Berger SP (1996) Effects of environmental conditioning on the development of nicotine sensitization: behavioral and neurochemical analysis. Psychopharmacology 126:301–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stevenson RA, Besheer J, Hodge CW (2008) Comparison of ethanol locomotor sensitization in adolescent and adult DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology 197:361–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Szumlinski KK, Allan M, Talangbayan H, Tracey A, Szechtman H (1997) Locomotor sensitization to quinpirole: environment-modulated increase in efficacy and context-dependent increase in potency. Psychopharmacology 134:193–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tambour S, Didone V, Tirelli E, Quertemont E (2006) Locomotor effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde after peripheral and intraventricular injections in Swiss and C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res 172:145–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tirelli E, Terry P (1998) Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity and sensitization: the role of habituation to the test context and the involvement of Pavlovian processes. Behav Pharmacol 9:409–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tirelli E, Laviola G, Adriani W (2003) Ontogenesis of behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference induced by psychostimulants in laboratory rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:163–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tirelli E, Michel A, Brabant C (2005) Cocaine-conditioned activity persists for a longer time than cocaine-sensitized activity in mice: implications fort he theories using pavlovian excitatory conditioning to explain the context-specificity of sensitization. Behav Brain Res 165:18–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trujillo KA (2000) Are NMDA receptors involved in opiate-induced neural and behavioral plasticity? A review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology 151:121–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vanderschuren LJMJ, Kalivas PW (2000) Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology 151:99–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zapata A, Gonzales RA, Shippenberg TS (2006) Repeated ethanol intoxication induces behavioral sensitization in the absence of a sensitized accumbens dopamine response in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:396–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Didone
    • 1
  • Caroline Quoilin
    • 1
  • Ezio Tirelli
    • 1
  • Etienne Quertemont
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives et ComportementalesUniversité de LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations