Brain mu-opioid receptor binding: relationship to relapse to cocaine use after monitored abstinence
Cocaine users have increased regional brain mu-opioid receptor (mOR) binding which correlates with cocaine craving. The relationship of mOR binding to relapse is unknown.
To evaluate regional brain mOR binding as a predictor of relapse to cocaine use is the objective of the study.
Materials and methods
Fifteen nontreatment-seeking, adult cocaine users were housed on a closed research ward for 12 weeks of monitored abstinence and then followed for up to 1 year after discharge. Regional brain mOR binding was measured after 1 and 12 weeks using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C]carfentanil (a selective mOR agonist). Time to first cocaine use (lapse) and to first two consecutive days of cocaine use (relapse) after discharge was based on self-report and urine toxicology.
A shorter interval before relapse was associated with increased mOR binding in frontal and temporal cortical regions at 1 and 12 weeks of abstinence (Ps < 0.001) and with a lesser decrease in binding between 1 and 12 weeks (Ps < 0.0008). There were significant positive correlations between mOR binding at 12 weeks and percent days of cocaine use during first month after relapse (Ps < 0.002). In multiple linear regression analysis, mOR binding contributed significantly to the prediction of time to relapse (R2 = 0.79, P < 0.001), even after accounting for clinical variables.
Increased brain mOR binding in frontal and temporal cortical regions is a significant independent predictor of time to relapse to cocaine use, suggesting an important role for the brain endogenous opioid system in cocaine addiction.
KeywordsCocaine Mu-opioid receptor Positron emission tomography Relapse Carfentanil Frontal cortex Temporal cortex
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Derogatis LR (1983) SCL-90R administration, scoring and procedures. Manual II. Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson, MDGoogle Scholar
- Gorelick DA (2003) Pharmacologic interventions for cocaine, crack, and other stimulant addiction. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, Mayo-Smith MF, Ries RK, Wilford BB (eds) Principles of addiction medicine. American Society of Addiction Medicine, Chevy Chase, MD, pp 785–800Google Scholar
- Grusser SM, Wrase J, Klein S, Hermann D, Smolka MN, Ruf M, Weber-Fahr W, Flor H, Mann K, Braus DF, Heinz A (2004) Cue-induced activation of the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex is associated with subsequent relapse in abstinent alcoholics. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 175:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guardia J, Catafau AM, Batlle F, Martin JC, Segura L, Gonzalvo B, Prat G, Carrio I, Casas M (2000) Striatal dopaminergic D(2) receptor density measured by [(123)I]iodobenzamide SPECT in the prediction of treatment outcome of alcohol-dependent patients. Am J Psychiatry 157:127–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrison LD (1995) The validity of self-reported data on drug use. J Drug Issues 25(1):91–111Google Scholar
- Knapp WP, Soares BG, Farrel M, Lima MS (2007) Psychosocial interventions for cocaine and psychostimulant amphetamines related disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 3, Art. No. CD003023Google Scholar
- Milby JB, Schumacher JE, Vuchinich RE, Wallace D, Plant MA, Freedman MJ, McNamara C, Ward CL (2004) Transitions during effective treatment for cocaine-abusing homeless persons: establishing abstinence, lapse, and relapse, and reestablishing abstinence. Psychol Addict Behav 18:250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson DB, Kotranski L, Semaan S, Collier K, Lauby J, Feighan K, Halbert J (1998) The validity of self-reported opiate and cocaine use by out-of-treatment drug users. J Drug Issues 28(2):483–494Google Scholar
- Sobell LC, Sobell MB (1992) Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen J (eds) Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biological methods. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp 41–72Google Scholar