, 202:497 | Cite as

Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on performance of a lateralized reaction time task in rats

Original Investigation



The ability to detect unpredictable cues can involve stimulus-elicited orienting of attention (bottom-up processing); however, in many settings, target onset is partially predictable, meaning that subjects can benefit from the rule-guided, endogenous control of attention (top-down processing). Noradrenaline has been implicated in attention per se, but it is not clear whether it differentially participates in these two dimensions of attentional function.


We sought to examine the effects of selective or nonselective inhibitors of noradrenaline reuptake on different modes of attentional performance in rats.

Materials and methods

Adult male Long–Evans rats were trained to perform a lateralized reaction time task where a variable-duration preparatory period preceded delivery of a visual target stimulus. Atomoxetine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) or methylphenidate (0.32 mg/kg, i.p.) were administered before sessions in which the preparatory period was systematically varied.


When the preparatory time was brief (0.2 s), response times were significantly longer than when the preparatory time was long (1.0 s), suggesting that rats were able to orient their attention before target onset when the longer period was imposed. Atomoxetine differentially modulated performance in these two conditions, improving response accuracy when a long preparatory period was imposed but impairing accuracy when the preparatory time was made brief. Methylphenidate did not differentially affect responding under the two conditions.


These data suggest that selective inhibition of the noradrenaline transporter may specifically benefit attentional performance of tasks that permit the controlled recruitment of attention, rather than during tests of pure stimulus-driven attention.


Norepinephrine Cognitive control Stimulant drugs ADHD Attention Dopamine 



These experiments were funded, in part, by PHS grants P50-MH77248 and P20-DA22539 to JDJ and a grant from the Tenenbaum Creativity Initiative at UCLA.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors have no competing conflicts of interest.


  1. Aston-Jones G, Rajkowski J, Cohen J (2000) Locus coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention. Prog Brain Res 126:165–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berridge CW, Waterhouse BD (2003) The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 42:33–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berridge CW, Devilbiss DM, Andrzejewski ME, Arnsten AF, Kelley AE, Schmeichel B, Hamilton C, Spencer RC (2006) Methylphenidate preferentially increases catecholamine neurotransmission within the prefrontal cortex at low doses that enhance cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry 60:1111–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blondeau C, Dellu-Hagedorn F (2007) Dimensional analysis of ADHD subtypes in rats. Biol Psychiatry 61:1340–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brasted PJ, Dunnett SB, Robbins TW (2000) Unilateral lesions of the medial agranular cortex impair responding on a lateralised reaction time task. Behav Brain Res 111:139–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown VJ, Robbins TW (1989) Deficits in response space following unilateral striatal dopamine depletion in the rat. J Neurosci 9:983–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown VJ, Bowman EM, Robbins TW (1991) Response-related deficits following unilateral lesions of the medial agranular cortex of the rat. Behav Neurosci 105:567–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9:361–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carli M, Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1985) Depletion of unilateral striatal dopamine impairs initiation of contralateral actions and not sensory attention. Nature 313:679–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole BJ, Robbins TW (1992) Forebrain norepinephrine: role in controlled information processing in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 7:129–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Connor CE, Egeth HE, Yantis S (2004) Visual attention: bottom-up versus top-down. Curr Biol 14:R850–R852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:201–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalley JW, McGaughy J, O’Connell MT, Cardinal RN, Levita L, Robbins TW (2001) Distinct changes in cortical acetylcholine and noradrenaline efflux during contingent and noncontingent performance of a visual attentional task. J Neurosci 21:4908–4914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalley JW, Theobald DE, Eagle DM, Passetti F, Robbins TW (2002) Deficits in impulse control associated with tonically-elevated serotonergic function in rat prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:716–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Robbins TW (2004) Prefrontal executive and cognitive functions in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:771–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalley JW, Fryer TD, Brichard L, Robinson ES, Theobald DE, Laane K, Pena Y, Murphy ER, Shah Y, Probst K, Abakumova I, Aigbirhio FI, Richards HK, Hong Y, Baron JC, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2007) Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement. Science 315:1267–1270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deco G, Rolls ET (2005) Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: a unifying theory. Prog Neurobiol 76:236–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eagle DM, Tufft MR, Goodchild HL, Robbins TW (2007) Differential effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on stop-signal reaction time task performance in the rat, and interactions with the dopamine receptor antagonist cis-flupenthixol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 192:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison AA, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1997) Central 5-HT depletion enhances impulsive responding without affecting the accuracy of attentional performance: interactions with dopaminergic mechanisms. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 133:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jentsch JD, Arguello PA, Anzivino LA (2003) Null mutation of the arginine-vasopressin gene in rats slows attentional engagement and facilitates response accuracy in a lateralized reaction time task. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1597–1605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milstein JA, Lehmann O, Theobald DE, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2007) Selective depletion of cortical noradrenaline by anti-dopamine beta-hydroxylase-saporin impairs attentional function and enhances the effects of guanfacine in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 190:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Navarra R, Graf R, Huang Y, Logue S, Comery T, Hughes Z, Day M (2007) Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on attention and impulsivity in the 5-choice serial reaction time test. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32(1):34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Puumala T, Ruotsalainen S, Jakala P, Koivisto E, Riekkinen P Jr, Sirvio J (1996) Behavioral and pharmacological studies on the validation of a new animal model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurobiol Learn Mem 66:198–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robbins TW (1997) Arousal systems and attentional processes. Biol Psychol 45:57–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robinson ES, Eagle DM, Mar AC, Bari A, Banerjee G, Jiang X, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2007) Similar effects of the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine on three distinct forms of impulsivity in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 33(5):1028–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Usher M, Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D, Rajkowski J, Aston-Jones G (1999) The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. Science 283:549–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Witte EA, Marrocco RT (1997) Alteration of brain noradrenergic activity in rhesus monkeys affects the alerting component of covert orienting. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 132:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. David Jentsch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shawn M. Aarde
    • 1
  • Emanuele Seu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral SciencesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations