Psychopharmacology

, Volume 195, Issue 1, pp 103–115 | Cite as

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol does not result in cross-sensitization to NMDA receptor antagonists

Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Behavioral sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol may be related to neuroadaptations within glutamatergic systems. Previous research has suggested that the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) subclass of glutamate receptors is critical for the development of ethanol sensitization. We hypothesized that sensitization to ethanol would be associated with changes in sensitivity to NMDA receptor ligands.

Materials and methods

DBA/2J and heterogeneous stock (HS) mice were injected with ethanol or saline for 12 days and tested for their acute and sensitized responses to the locomotor effects of ethanol in automated activity monitors. After this treatment phase, mice were challenged with MK-801, ethanol, or ketamine, and locomotor activity was measured for 20 to 60 min. Other ethanol-sensitized and nonsensitized mice were assessed for sensitivity to the effects of NMDA after tail-vein infusions.

Results

There was no evidence for cross-sensitization to MK-801 or ketamine, or altered sensitivity to NMDA in ethanol-sensitized animals, in any experiment. In one experiment, previously ethanol-treated HS mice developed tolerance to the locomotor stimulant effects of ketamine.

Conclusions

These results indicate that ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization is not associated with increased behavioral sensitivity to NMDA receptor antagonists or altered sensitivity to NMDA receptor agonists. To the extent that changes in sensitivity to these ligands reflect changes in NMDA receptors, these results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that ethanol sensitization is associated with alterations in NMDA receptor-mediated processes.

Keywords

Activation Glutamate receptor Motor activity Adaptation Addiction Alcohol Excitatory amino acid Psychostimulant Drug abuse Reverse tolerance 

References

  1. Becker HC, Veatch LM, Diaz-Granados JL (1998) Repeated ethanol withdrawal experience selectively alters sensitivity to different chemoconvulsant drugs in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 139:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Shahar O, Moscarello JM, Jacob B, Roarty MP, Ettenberg A (2005) Prolonged daily exposure to i.v. cocaine results in tolerance to its stimulant effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 82:411–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biala G, Weglinska B (2004) Calcium channel antagonists attenuate cross-sensitization to the rewarding and/or locomotor effects of nicotine, morphine and MK-801. J Pharm Pharmacol 56:1021–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers MS, McFarland K, Lake RW, Peterson YK, Lapish CC, Gregory ML, Lanier SM, Kalivas PW (2004) Activator of G protein signaling 3: a gatekeeper of cocaine sensitization and drug seeking. Neuron 42:269–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breese GR, Coyle S, Frye GD, Mueller RA (1985) Effects of TRH, ethanol, and TRH-ethanol combination on activity in rats with altered monoamine content. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:1013–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadbent J, Kampmueller KM, Koonse SA (2003) Expression of behavioral sensitization to ethanol by DBA/2J mice: the role of NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 167:225–234Google Scholar
  7. Broadbent J, Weitemier AZ (1999) Dizocilpine (MK-801) prevents the development of sensitization to ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Alcohol Alcohol 34:283–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Camarini R, Frussa-Filho R, Monteiro MG, Calil HM (2000) MK-801 blocks the development of behavioral sensitization to the ethanol. Alcohol, Clin Exp Res 24:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chester JA, Cunningham CL (1999) GABA(A) receptors modulate ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and taste aversion in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 144:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crabbe JC (1983) Sensitivity to ethanol in inbred mice: genotypic correlations among several behavioral responses. Behav Neurosci 97:280–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crabbe JC, Kosobud A, Young ER (1983) Genetic selection for ethanol withdrawal severity: differences in replicate mouse lines. Life Sci 33:955–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crabbe JC, Merrill CD, Belknap JK (1991) Effects of convulsants on handling-induced convulsions in mice selected for ethanol withdrawal severity. Brain Res 550:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham CL, Tull LE, Rindal KE, Meyer PJ (2002) Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 160:414–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Wit H, Uhlenhuth EH, Pierri J, Johanson CE (1987) Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses to alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 11:52–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demarest K, Hitzemann B, Mahjubi E, McCaughran J Jr, Hitzemann R (1998) Further evidence that the central nucleus of the amygdala is associated with the ethanol-induced locomotor response. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22:1531–1537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudek BC, Phillips TJ (1983) Locomotor stimulant and intoxicant properties of methanol, ethanol, tertiary butanol and pentobarbital in Long-Sleep and Short-Sleep mice. Subst Alcohol Actions/Misuse 4:31–36Google Scholar
  17. El-Fakahany EF, Miller ER, Abbassy MA, Eldefrawi AT, Eldefrawi ME (1983) Alcohol modulation of drug binding to the channel sites of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 224:289–296Google Scholar
  18. Erickson CK, Kochhar A (1985) An animal model for low dose ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation: behavioral characteristics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 9:310–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrario CR, Robinson TE (2007) Amphetamine pretreatment accelerates the subsequent escalation of cocaine self-administration behavior. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17:352–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finn DA, Crabbe JC (1999) Chronic ethanol differentially alters susceptibility to chemically induced convulsions in withdrawal seizure-prone and -resistant mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 288:782–790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gale K (1988) Progression and generalization of seizure discharge: anatomical and neurochemical substrates. Epilepsia 29(Suppl 2):S15–S34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Grahame NJ, Rodd-Henricks K, Li TK, Lumeng L (2000) Ethanol locomotor sensitization, but not tolerance correlates with selection for alcohol preference in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gulya K, Grant KA, Valverius P, Hoffman PL, Tabakoff B (1991) Brain regional specificity and time-course of changes in the NMDA receptor–ionophore complex during ethanol withdrawal. Brain Res 547:129–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holdstock L, King AC, de Wit H (2000) Subjective and objective responses to ethanol in moderate/heavy and light social drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24:789–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoshaw BA, Lewis MJ (2001) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol in rats: evidence from the Sprague–Dawley strain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:685–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iijima Y, Asami T, Kuribara H (1996) Modification by MK-801 (dizocilpine), a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, of morphine sensitization: evaluation by ambulation in mice. Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi 16:11–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito K, Abekawa T, Koyama T (2006) Relationship between development of cross-sensitization to MK-801 and delayed increases in glutamate levels in the nucleus accumbens induced by a high dose of methamphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 187:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Itzhak Y, Martin JL (1999) Effects of cocaine, nicotine, dizocipline and alcohol on mice locomotor activity: cocaine-alcohol cross-sensitization involves upregulation of striatal dopamine transporter binding sites. Brain Res 818:204–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalivas PW, Pierce RC, Cornish J, Sorg BA (1998) A role for sensitization in craving and relapse in cocaine addiction. J Psychopharmacol 12:49–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kosobud AE, Crabbe JC (1993) Sensitivity to N-methyl-D-aspartic acid-induced convulsions is genetically associated with resistance to ethanol withdrawal seizures. Brain Res 610:176–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kotlinska J, Bochenski M, Danysz W (2006) N-methyl-D-aspartate and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors are involved in the expression of ethanol-induced sensitization in mice. Behav Pharmacol 17:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lessov CN, Phillips TJ (2003) Cross-sensitization between the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol and those of morphine and cocaine in mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27:616–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lessov CN, Palmer AA, Quick EA, Phillips TJ (2001a) Voluntary ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice before and after sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 155:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lessov CN, Risinger FO, Phillips TJ (2001b) Attenuation of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in mice sensitized to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol. Behav Neurosci 115:146–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lovinger DM, White G, Weight FF (1989) Ethanol inhibits NMDA-activated ion current in hippocampal neurons. Science 243:1721–1724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manley SJ, Little HJ (1997) Enhancement of amphetamine- and cocaine-induced locomotor activity after chronic ethanol administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281:1330–1339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McClearn GE, Kakihana R (1981) Selective breeding for alcohol sensitivity: short-sleep and long-sleep mice. In: McClearn GE, Deitrich RA, Erwin VG (eds) Development of animal models as a pharmacogenetic tool (NIAAA Research Monograph no. 6). NIAAA, Rockville, MD, pp 147–159Google Scholar
  38. Messing RO, Carpenter CL, Diamond I, Greenberg DA (1986) Ethanol regulates calcium channels in clonal neural cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:6213–6215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer PJ, Phillips TJ (2003a) Bivalent effects of MK-801 on ethanol-induced sensitization do not parallel its effects on ethanol-induced tolerance. Behav Neurosci 117:641–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyer PJ, Phillips TJ (2003b) Sensitivity to ketamine, alone or in combination with ethanol, is altered in mice selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol’s locomotor effects. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27:1701–1709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyer PJ, Palmer AA, McKinnon CS, Phillips TJ (2005) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol is modulated by environmental conditions, but is not associated with cross-sensitization to allopregnanolone or pentobarbital in DBA/2J mice. Neuroscience 131:263–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nagy GG, Watanabe M, Fukaya M, Todd AJ (2004) Synaptic distribution of the NR1, NR2A and NR2B subunits of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor in the rat lumbar spinal cord revealed with an antigen-unmasking technique. Eur J Neurosci 20:3301–3312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nestby P, Vanderschuren LJ, De Vries TJ, Hogenboom F, Wardeh G, Mulder AH, Schoffelmeer AN (1997) Ethanol, like psychostim-ulants and morphine, causes long-lasting hyperreactivity of dopamine and acetylcholine neurons of rat nucleus accumbens: possible role in behavioural sensitization. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 133:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newlin DB, Thomson JB (1991) Chronic tolerance and sensitization to alcohol in sons of alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 15:399–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phillips TJ, Shen EH (1996) Neurochemical bases of locomotion and ethanol stimulant effects. Int Rev Neurobiol 39:243–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips TJ, Dickinson S, Burkhart-Kasch S (1994) Behavioral sensitization to drug stimulant effects in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice. Behav Neurosci 108:789–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phillips TJ, Huson M, Gwiazdon C, Burkhart-Kasch S, Shen EH (1995) Effects of acute and repeated ethanol exposures on the locomotor activity of BXD recombinant inbred mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:269–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pillai G, Brown NA, McAllister G, Milligan G, Seabrook GR (1998) Human D2 and D4 dopamine receptors couple through betagamma G-protein subunits to inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRK1) in a Xenopus oocyte expression system: selective antagonism by L-741,626 and L-745,870 respectively. Neuropharmacology 37:983–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quadros IM, Hipolide DC, Frussa-Filho R, De Lucca EM, Nobrega JN, Souza-Formigoni ML (2002) Resistance to ethanol sensitization is associated with increased NMDA receptor binding in specific brain areas. Eur J Pharmacol 442:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberto M, Bajo M, Crawford E, Madamba SG, Siggins GR (2006) Chronic ethanol exposure and protracted abstinence alter NMDA receptors in central amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:988–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18:247–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Samaha AN, Li Y, Robinson TE (2002) The rate of intravenous cocaine administration determines susceptibility to sensitization. J Neurosci 22:3244–3250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanchez FP, Dickenson L, George FR (1996) Ethanol self-administration is genetically independent of locomotor stimulation in fast and slow mice. Alcohol 13:79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schuckit MA (1984) Subjective responses to alcohol in sons of alcoholics and control subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41:879–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schuckit MA (1994) Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 151:184–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheela Rani CS, Ticku MK (2006) Comparison of chronic ethanol and chronic intermittent ethanol treatments on the expression of GABA(A) and NMDA receptor subunits. Alcohol 38:89–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shen EH, Phillips TJ (1998) MK-801 potentiates ethanol’s effects on locomotor activity in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 59:135–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tindell AJ, Berridge KC, Zhang J, Pecina S, Aldridge JW (2005) Ventral pallidal neurons code incentive motivation: amplification by mesolimbic sensitization and amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 22:2617–2634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Trujillo KA (2002) The neurobiology of opiate tolerance, dependence and sensitization: mechanisms of NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity. Neurotox Res 4:373–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tzschentke TM, Schmidt WJ (2000) Functional relationship among medial prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, and ventral tegmental area in locomotion and reward. Crit Rev Neurobiol 14:131–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Vanderschuren LJ, Kalivas PW (2000) Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vanderschuren LJ, Schoffelmeer AN, De Vries TJ (1997) Does dizocilpine (MK-801) inhibit the development of morphine-induced behavioural sensitization in rats? Life Sci 61:PL 427–PL 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Velardo MJ, Simpson VJ, Zahniser NR (1998) Differences in NMDA receptor antagonist-induced locomotor activity and [3H]MK-801 binding sites in short-sleep and long-sleep mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22:1509–1515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wise RA, Munn E (1993) Effects of repeated amphetamine injections on lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward and subsequent locomotion. Behav Brain Res 55:195–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright JM, Peoples RW, Weight FF (1996) Single-channel and whole-cell analysis of ethanol inhibition of NMDA-activated currents in cultured mouse cortical and hippocampal neurons. Brain Res 738:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu X, Domino EF (1999) A further study on asymmetric cross-sensitization between MK-801 and phencyclidine-induced ambulatory activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63:413–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research ServiceVeterans Affairs Medical CenterPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral NeuroscienceOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and Portland Alcohol Research CenterOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations