A triazolam/amphetamine dose–effect interaction study: dissociation of effects on memory versus arousal
- 107 Downloads
In addition to producing robust memory impairment, benzodiazepines also induce marked sedation. Thus, it is possible that the observed amnestic effects are secondary to more global sedative effects and do not reflect a specific primary benzodiazepine effect on memory mechanisms.
The objective was to use the nonspecific stimulant d-amphetamine to dissociate the sedative and memory-impairing effects of the benzodiazepine triazolam.
Materials and methods
Single oral doses of placebo, triazolam alone (0.25, 0.50 mg/70 kg), d-amphetamine sulfate alone (20, 30 mg/70 kg), and triazolam (0.25, 0.50 mg/70 kg) and d-amphetamine sulfate (20, 30 mg/70 kg) conjointly (at all dose combinations) were administered to 18 healthy adult participants across nine sessions in a double-blind, staggered-dosing, crossover design. In addition to standard data analyses, analyses were also conducted on z-score standardized data, enabling effects to be directly compared across measures.
Relative to the sedative measures, the memory measures generally exhibited a pattern of less reversal of triazolam’s effects by d-amphetamine. The memory measures ranged in degree of reversal such that the most reversal was observed for reaction time on the n-back working memory task, and the least reversal was observed for accuracy on the Sternberg working memory task, with most measures showing an overall pattern of partial reversal.
Benzodiazepines have specific effects on memory that are not merely a by-product of the drugs’ sedative effects, and the degree to which sedative effects contribute to the amnestic effects varies as a function of the particular memory process being assessed.
KeywordsTriazolam Amphetamine Memory Arousal Sedative
- Baddeley AD (1992) Working memory: the interface between memory and cognition. J Cogn Neurosci 4:281–288Google Scholar
- Curran HV (2000) Psychopharmacological approaches to human memory. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd edn. Boston, MIT, pp 797–804Google Scholar
- Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a research’s handbook, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- McLeod DR, Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Yingling J (1982) An automated version of the digit symbol substitution test (DSST). Behav Res Meth Instrum 14:463–466Google Scholar
- Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP (1994) Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MITGoogle Scholar
- Thorndike EL, Lorge I (1944) The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. Teacher’s College, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds) Organization of memory. New York, Academic, pp 381–403Google Scholar
- Tulving E (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Williams EJ (1949) Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 2:149–168Google Scholar