Psychopharmacology

, Volume 192, Issue 2, pp 231–241

Rapid induction of Pavlovian approach to an ethanol-paired visual cue in mice

Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Although many studies have shown Pavlovian conditioned approach to cues paired with natural reinforcers, it has been quite difficult to induce such behavior with drug reinforcers.

Objectives

This experiment tested a novel Pavlovian procedure for inducing approach to a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with ethanol.

Methods

Mice (NZB/B1NJ, DBA/2J) received intraperitoneal injections of ethanol (2 g/kg) immediately before 10-min exposure to a rectangular chamber that contained a distinctive visual cue (star) at one end (Paired group, CS+ trials). On alternate days, saline injection preceded apparatus exposure with no distinctive cues (CS− trials). Unpaired control mice received ethanol in the home cage 60–75 min after each CS+ trial.

Results

NZB/B1NJ Paired group mice spent increasing amounts of time (>85% of the session) in proximity to the star, whereas Unpaired group mice did not. DBA/2J Paired group mice spent slightly more time on the star side than Unpaired group mice but did not show an acquisition curve. Postconditioning tests showed a strong preference for the star side in Paired groups from both strains after saline injection. However, only NZB/B1NJ mice showed a preference after ethanol.

Conclusions

This study provides the first unambiguous demonstration of Pavlovian conditioned approach to an ethanol-paired visual stimulus in the absence of any contingency between the animal’s behavior and drug exposure. This effect, which is remarkable both in terms of its magnitude and the rapidity with which it was produced (within 2–3 trials), may be related to the cue-associated craving that accompanies alcohol and drug addiction.

Keywords

Ethanol Autoshaping Sign-tracking Conditioned approach Place conditioning Reward Locomotor activity Inbred mice (NZB/B1NJ, DBA/2J) 

References

  1. Broadbent J, Cunningham CL (1996) Pavlovian conditioning of morphine hyperthermia: assessment of interstimulus interval and CS–US overlap. Psychopharmacology 126:156–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cardinal RN, Everitt BJ (2004) Neural and psychological mechanisms underlying appetitive learning: links to drug addiction. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardinal RN, Parkinson JA, Lachenal G, Halkerston KM, Rudarakanchana N, Hall J, Morrison CH, Howes SR, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2002) Effects of selective excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens core, anterior cingulate cortex, and central nucleus of the amygdala on autoshaping performance in rats. Behav Neurosci 116:553–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunningham CL, Noble D (1992) Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: role in sensitization and conditioned place preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43:307–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham CL, Okorn DA, Howard CE (1997) Interstimulus interval determines whether ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice. Anim Learn Behav 25:31–42Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham CL, Dickinson SD, Grahame NJ, Okorn DM, McMullin CS (1999) Genetic differences in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice depend on conditioning trial duration. Psychopharmacology 146:73–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cunningham CL, Tull LE, Rindal KE, Meyer PJ (2002) Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect. Psychopharmacology 160:414–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham CL, Ferree NK, Howard MA (2003) Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology 170:409–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham CL, Gremel CM, Groblewski PA (2006a) Drug-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice. Nature Protocols 1:1662–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham CL, Patel P, Milner L (2006b) Spatial location is critical for conditioning place preference with visual but not tactile stimuli. Behav Neurosci 120:1115–1132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ (2004) Conditioned reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with self-administered cocaine, heroin or sucrose: implications for the persistence of addictive behaviour. Neuropharmacology 47(Suppl 1):202–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2005) Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci 8:1481–1489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Everitt BJ, Dickinson A, Robbins TW (2001) The neuropsychological basis of addictive behaviour. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36:129–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gremel CM, Cunningham CL (2007) Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice. Psychopharmacology (in press). DOI 10.1007/s00213-006-0651-5
  15. Grusser SM, Wrase J, Klein S, Hermann D, Smolka MN, Ruf M, Weber-Fahr W, Flor H, Mann K, Braus DF, Heinz A (2004) Cue-induced activation of the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex is associated with subsequent relapse in abstinent alcoholics. Psychopharmacology 175:296–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hearst E, Jenkins HM (1974) Sign tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. The Psychonomic Society, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  17. Kearns DN, Weiss SJ (2004) Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli. Learn Behav 32:463–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Krank MD (2003) Pavlovian conditioning with ethanol: sign-tracking (autoshaping), conditioned incentive, and ethanol self-administration. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27:1592–1598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ludwig AM (1988) Understanding the alcoholic’s mind: the nature of craving and how to control it. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Myrick H, Anton RF, Li X, Henderson S, Drobes D, Voronin K, George MS (2004) Differential brain activity in alcoholics and social drinkers to alcohol cues: relationship to craving. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:393–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parkinson JA, Willoughby PJ, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2000) Disconnection of the anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens core impairs Pavlovian approach behavior: further evidence for limbic cortical–ventral striatopallidal systems. Behav Neurosci 114:42–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peden BF, Browne MP, Hearst E (1977) Persistent approaches to a signal for food despite food omission for approaching. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 3:377–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2002) Limbic-striatal memory systems and drug addiction. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78:625–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive–sensitization theory of addiction. Brains Res Rev 18:247–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiffany ST, Conklin CA (2000) A cognitive processing model of alcohol craving and compulsive alcohol use. Addiction 95(Suppl 2):S145–S153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomie A (1996) Locating reward cue at response manipulandum (CAM) induces symptoms of drug abuse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20:505–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomie A, Brooks W, Zito B (1989) Sign-tracking: the search for reward. In: Klein SB, Mowrer RR (eds) Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 191–223Google Scholar
  28. Tomie A, Festa ED, Sparta DR, Pohorecky LA (2003a) Lever conditioned stimulus-directed autoshaping induced by saccharin-ethanol unconditioned stimulus solution: effects of ethanol concentration and trial spacing. Alcohol 30:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomie A, Wong K, Apor K, Patterson-Buckendahl P, Pohorecky LA (2003b) Autoshaping of ethanol drinking in rats: effects of ethanol concentration and trial spacing. Alcohol 31:125–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tomie A, Kuo T, Apor KR, Salomon KE, Pohorecky LA (2004) Autoshaping induces ethanol drinking in nondeprived rats: evidence of long-term retention but no induction of ethanol preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 77:797–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tzschentke TM (1998) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 56:613–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Uslaner JM, Acerbo MJ, Jones SA, Robinson TE (2006) The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behav Brain Res 169:320–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yokel RA (1987) Intravenous self-administration: response rates, the effects of pharmacological challenges, and drug preference. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and Portland Alcohol Research CenterOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations