Psychopharmacology

, Volume 191, Issue 2, pp 287–295 | Cite as

Long-term cocaine self-administration under fixed–ratio and second-order schedules in monkeys

  • Paul W. Czoty
  • Beth A. Reboussin
  • Tonya L. Calhoun
  • Susan H. Nader
  • Michael A. Nader
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Studies in rodents have demonstrated that increased access to cocaine can result in increases in drug intake per unit time.

Objectives

The present studies characterized long-term changes in cocaine self-administration associated with quantitatively and qualitatively different conditions of cocaine availability in monkeys.

Materials and methods

Separate groups of rhesus monkeys (n = 6/group) self-administered cocaine (0.2 mg/kg per injection) under a fixed ratio (FR) 30 schedule for 3 h twice daily for two consecutive days each week for 1 year, or responded under a second-order FR 10 (fixed interval 3-min:S) schedule of 0.2 mg/kg per injection cocaine during daily sessions. After 18 weeks, probe sessions were conducted once per week, in which responding was maintained under a fixed interval (FI) 30-min schedule in the presence of distinct stimuli.

Results

Weekly cocaine intakes under the FR schedule were stable in three subjects, but increased progressively in three monkeys over 1 year. In contrast, response rates under the second-order schedule were low and stable over time. Responding under the FI 30-min schedule was higher for monkeys in the FR group and pattern of responding was not indicative of FI performance, perhaps due to experimental history.

Conclusions

These data suggest that increases in cocaine intake can be observed under ratio schedules in monkeys. The use of an FI 30-min “probe” to assess changes in “drug seeking” appeared to be influenced by experimental history. These data may aid in the development of behavioral models of cocaine abuse, which focus on the compulsive nature of drug taking.

Keywords

Cocaine Fixed ratio schedule Fixed interval schedule Second-order schedule Rhesus monkeys 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIDA grants DA 14637 (MAN) and DA 016279 (BAR).

References

  1. Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1998) Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed SH, Lutjens R, van der Stap LD, Lekic D, Romano-Spica V, Morales M, Koob GF, Repunte-Canonigo V, Sanna PP (2005) Gene expression evidence for remodeling of lateral hypothalamic circuitry in cocaine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11533–11538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aigner TG, Balster RL (1978) Choice behavior in rhesus monkeys: cocaine versus food. Science 201:534–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouton ME (2004) Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learn Mem 11:485–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1985) Toxicity associated with long-term intravenous heroin and cocaine self-administration in the rat. J Am Med Assoc 254:81–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catania AC, Reynolds GS (1968) A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 24:657–665Google Scholar
  7. Claytor R, Lile JA, Nader MA (2006) The effects of eticlopride and the selective D3-antagonist PNU 99194-A on food- and cocaine-maintained responding in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 83: 456–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czoty PW, Martelle JL, Nader MA (2006) Influence of abstinence and conditions of cocaine access on the reinforcing strength of cocaine in nonhuman primates. Drug Alcohol Depend 85(3):213–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dackis CA, O’Brien CP (2001) Cocaine dependence: a disease of the brain’s reward centers. J Subst Abuse Treat 21:111–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De La Garza R 2nd (2005) Endotoxin- or pro-inflammatory cytokine-induced sickness behavior as an animal model of depression: focus on anhedonia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deneau G, Yanagita T, Seevers MH (1969) Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey. Psychopharmacologia 16:30–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW, (2000) Second-order schedules of drug reinforcement in rats and monkeys: measurement of reinforcing efficacy and drug-seeking behaviour. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrario CR, Gorny G, Crombag HS, Li Y, Kolb B, Robinson TE (2005) Neural and behavioral plasticity associated with the transition from controlled to escalated cocaine use. Biol Psychiatry 58:751–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitch TE, Roberts DC (1993) The effects of dose and access restrictions on the periodicity of cocaine self-administration in the rat. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:119–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gawin FH (1991) Cocaine addiction: psychology and neurophysiology. Science 251:1580–1586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gawin FH, Ellinwood EH Jr (1988) Cocaine and other stimulants. Actions, abuse, and treatment. N Engl J Med 318:1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gawin FH, Kleber HD (1986) Abstinence symptomatology an psychiatric diagnosis in cocaine abusers. Clinical observations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:107–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg SR, Gardner ML (1981) Second-order schedules: extended sequences of behavior controlled by brief environmental stimuli associated with drug self-administration. NIDA Res Monogr 37:241–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg SR, Tang AH (1977) Behavior maintained under second-order schedules of intravenous morphine injection in squirrel and rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 51:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND (2002) Drug addiction and its underlying neurological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 159:1642–1652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grigson PS, Twining RC (2002) Cocaine-induced suppression of saccharin intake: a model of drug-induced devaluation of natural rewards. Behav Neurosci 116:321–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johanson CE, Balster RL, Bonese K (1976) Self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs: the effects of unlimited access. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 4:54–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz JL (1980) Second-order schedules of intramuscular cocaine injection in the squirrel monkey: comparisons with food presentation and effects of d-amphetamine and promazine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 212:405–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mantsch JR, Yuferov V, Mathieu-Kia AM, Ho A, Kreek MJ (2003) Neuroendocrine alterations in a high-dose, extended-access rat self-administration model of escalating cocaine use. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28:836–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morgan D, Roberts DC (2004) Sensitization to the reinforcing effects of cocaine following binge-abstinent self-administration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:803–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nader MA, Bowen CA (1995) Effects of different food-reinforcement histories on cocaine self-administration by rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 118:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nader MA, Reboussin DM (1994) The effects of behavioral history on cocaine self-administration by rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 115:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nader MA, Morgan D, Gage HD, Nader SH, Calhoun TL, Buchheimer N, Ehrenkaufer R, Mach RH (2006) PET imaging of dopamine D2 receptors during chronic cocaine self-administration in monkeys. Nat Neurosci 9:1050–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Brien CP, Childress AR, Ehrman R, Robbins SJ (1998) Conditioning factors in drug abuse: can they explain compulsion? J Psychopharmacol 12:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Porrino LJ, Lyons D, Letchworth SR, Freedland CS, Nader MA (2002) Structural and functional neuroimaging of the effects of cocaine in human and nonhuman primates. In: Massaro EJ (ed) Handbook of neurotoxicology, vol. 2 Press Humana I, Totowa, NJ, pp 413–435Google Scholar
  32. Roberts DC, Brebner K, Vincler M, Lynch WJ (2002) Patterns of cocaine self-administration in rats produced by various access conditions under a discrete trials procedure. Drug Alcohol Depend 67:291–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schindler CW, Panlilio LV, Goldberg SR (2002) Second-order schedules of drug self-administration in animals. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 163:327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Self DW, Choi KH, Simmons D, Walker JR, Smagula CS (2004) Extinction training regulates neuroadaptive responses to withdrawal from chronic cocaine self-administration. Learn Mem 11:648–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J (2003) The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tornatzky W, Miczek KA (2000) Cocaine self-administration “binges”: transition from behavioral and autonomic regulation toward homeostatic dysregulation in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 148:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vanderschuren LJ, Everitt BJ (2004) Drug seeking becomes compulsive after prolonged cocaine self-administration. Science 305:1017–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Hitzemann R, Logan J, Schlyer DJ, Dewey SL, Wolf AP (1993) Decreased dopamine D2 receptor availability is associated with reduced frontal metabolism in cocaine abusers. Synapse 14:169–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiss F, Markou A, Lorang MT, Koob GF (1992) Basal extracellular dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens are decreased during cocaine withdrawal after unlimited-access self-administration. Brain Res 593:314–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willner P, Muscat R, Papp M (1992) An animal model of anhedonia. Clin Neuropharmacol 15 (Suppl 1 Pt A):550A–551APubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul W. Czoty
    • 1
  • Beth A. Reboussin
    • 2
  • Tonya L. Calhoun
    • 1
  • Susan H. Nader
    • 1
  • Michael A. Nader
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and PharmacologyWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston-SalemUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biostatistical SciencesWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston-SalemUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations