, Volume 191, Issue 2, pp 195–202

Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice

  • Christina M. Gremel
  • Christopher L. Cunningham
Original Investigation



Reduced expression of a drug-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) may reflect a decrease in the drug’s conditioned rewarding effects. However, CPP is also open to disruption by processes unrelated to the underlying motivation. In unpublished studies, we previously observed that ethanol pretreatment before testing disrupted expression of ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. We hypothesized that this interference effect was due to large ethanol-induced increases in activity.


The present studies were designed to examine the relationship between test activity and expression of ethanol-induced CPP both in the presence and absence of ethanol. To assess the generality of this relationship, we examined these effects both in DBA/2J (which are highly activated by ethanol) and in NZB/B1NJ mice (which show similar CPP, but less ethanol-induced activation).

Materials and methods

In separate experiments, inbred mice from each strain underwent ethanol (2 g/kg) place conditioning. Saline or ethanol was then administered immediately before the test.


Ethanol, given immediately before the test, blocked the expression of ethanol CPP in DBA/2J, but not in NZB/B1NJ mice. Moreover, ethanol significantly increased test activity levels in DBA/2J and to a much lesser degree in NZB/B1NJ mice. Correlation analyses showed an inverse phenotypic relationship between preference and test activity, reflecting stronger preferences in less active mice.


Disruption of ethanol-CPP observed in DBA/2J mice may be a consequence of high ethanol-induced activity levels. More generally, these studies suggest that competing behaviors can affect expression of a drug-induced CPP independent of affecting the conditioned rewarding effects of the drug.


Conditioned place preference Ethanol Locomotor activity DBA/2J mice NZB/B1NJ mice Inbred mice 


  1. Bammer G, Chesher GB (1982) An analysis of some effects of ethanol on performance in a passive avoidance task. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 77:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardo MT, Bevins RA (2000) Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardo MT, Rowlett JK, Harris MJ (1995) Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 19:39–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevins RA, Cunningham CL (2006) Place conditioning: a methodological analysis. In: Anderson MJ (ed) Tasks and techniques: a sampling of methodologies for the investigation of animal learning, behavior, and cognition. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Carr GD, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1989) Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 264–319Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham CL (1979) Flavor and location aversions produced by ethanol. Behav Neural Biol 27:362–322Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham CL (1995) Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 120:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham CL, Niehus DR, Malott DH, Prather LK (1992) Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 107:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham CL, Dickinson SD, Okorn DB (1995) Naloxone facilitates extinction but does not affect acquisition or expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 3:330–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham CL, Okorn DA, Howard CE (1997) Interstimulus interval determines whether ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice. Anim Learn Behav 25:31–42Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham CL, Henderson CM, Bormann NM (1998) Extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and conditioned place aversion: effects of naloxone. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 139:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham CL, Dickinson SD, Grahame NJ, Okorn DM, McMullin CS (1999) Genetic differences in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice depend on conditioning trial duration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham CL, Tull LE, Rindal KE, Meyer PJ (2002) Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 160:414–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham CL, Ferree NK, Howard MA (2003) Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 170:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham CL, Gremel CM, Groblewski PA (2006a) Drug-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice. Nature Protocols 1:1662–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunningham CL, Patel P, Milner L (2006b) Spatial location is critical for conditioning place preference with visual but not tactile stimuli. Behav Neurosci 120:1115–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitchett AE, Barnard CJ, Cassaday HJ (2006) There’s no place like home: cage odours and place preference in subordinate CD-1 male mice. Physiol Behav 87:955–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchison HC, Tuchtie M, Gray KG, Steinberg D (1964) A study of the effects of alcohol on mental functions. Can Psychiatr Assoc J 9:33–42Google Scholar
  19. Kuzmin A, Sandin J, Terenius L, Ogren SO (2003) Acquisition, expression, and reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice: effects of opioid receptor-like 1 receptor agonists and naloxone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304:310–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Middaugh LD, Bandy AL (2000) Naltrexone effects on ethanol consumption and response to ethanol conditioned cues in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neisewander JL, Pierce RC, Bardo MT (1990) Naloxone enhances the expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 100:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Malley SS, Jaffe AJ, Chang G, Schottenfeld RS, Meyer RE, Rounsaville B (1992) Naltrexone and coping skills therapy for alcohol dependence. A controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49:881–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Overton DA (1972) State-dependent learning produced by alcohol and its relevance to alcoholism. In: Kissen B, Begleiter H (eds) The biology of alcoholism, vol 2. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips TJ, Dickinson S, Burkhart-Kasch S (1994) Behavioral sensitization to drug stimulant effects in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice. Behav Neurosci 108:789–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryabinin AE (1998) Role of hippocampus in alcohol-induced memory impairment: implications from behavioral and immediate early gene studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 139:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryback RS (1970) Alcohol amnesia: observations on seven inpatient alcoholics. Q J Stud Alcohol 31:616–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sora I, Hall FS, Andrews AM, Itokawa M, Li XF, Wei HB, Wichems C, Lesch KP, Murphy DL, Uhl GR (2001) Molecular mechanisms of cocaine reward: combined dopamine and serotonin transporter knockouts eliminate cocaine place preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5300–5305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tzschentke TM (1998) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 56:613–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vezina P, Stewart J (1987) Morphine conditioned place preference and locomotion: the effect of confinement during training. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 98:257–260Google Scholar
  30. Volpicelli JR, Alterman AI, Hayashida M, O’Brien CP (1992) Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49:876–880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987) A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94:469–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina M. Gremel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher L. Cunningham
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, L470Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Portland Alcohol Research CenterOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations