Psychopharmacology

, Volume 187, Issue 1, pp 36–46

Sensorimotor effects of pergolide, a dopamine agonist, in healthy subjects: a lateralized readiness potential study

Original Investigation

Abstract

Objective

The major purpose of the present study was to further elucidate dopaminergic modulation of sensorimotor processing in healthy human subjects.

Materials and Methods

To more specifically analyze dopaminergic effects on premotor and motor stages of sensorimotor processing, lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) were obtained. In a randomized double-blind crossover design, either 0.075 mg of the D1/D2 dopamine (DA) agonist pergolide or placebo were administered to 12 healthy male volunteers ranging from 19 to 25 years in age. The subjects performed a two-choice visual reaction time task. In addition to behavioral measures, such as response speed and error rate, stimulus-locked LRP (S-LRP) and response-locked LRP (LRP-R) latencies were determined. To better dissociate potential central and peripheral motor effects, measures of response dynamics and response-locked electromyogram (EMG-R) recordings were also obtained.

Observations

Pergolide reliably enhanced speed of stimulus-related information processing as indicated by shorter S-LRP latencies while LRP-R latencies, reaction time, and indicators of response dynamics were not influenced by DA agonistic treatment. Furthermore, lower EMG-R amplitudes and an increased number of wrong-hand responses were observed under pergolide compared to placebo.

Conclusion

The results indicate that dopaminergic neurotransmission effectively modulates early perceptual and cognitive stages of information processing as suggested by neural network models of the functional role of prefrontal DA. The lack of an effect on aspects of motor processing may be due to a higher capacity of the nigrostriatal compared to the mesocortical DA system to compensate pharmacologically induced changes in dopaminergic activity.

Keywords

Pergolide Healthy subjects Sensorimotor processing LRP Reaction time 

References

  1. Agid Y (1991) Parkinson’s disease: pathophysiology. Lancet 337:1321–1324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander G, DeLong M, Strick P (1986) Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 9:357–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR (1980) Cognitive psychology and its implications. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnott WL, Chenery HJ, Murdoch,BE, Silburn PA (2001) Semantic priming in Parkinson’s disease: evidence for delayed spreading activation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 23:502–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barch DM (2004) Pharmacological manipulation of human working memory. Psychopharmacology 174:126–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloxham CA, Dick DJ, Moore M (1987) Reaction times and attention in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:1178–1783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brogden RN, Carmine AA, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS (1982) Domperidone. A review of its pharmacological activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of chronic dyspepsia and as an antiemetic. Drugs 24:360–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boraud T, Bezard E, Bioulac B, Gross CE (2002) From single extracellular unit recording in experimental and human Parkinsonism to the development of a functional concept of the role played by the basal ganglia in motor control. Prog Neurobiol 66:265–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brumaghim JT, Klorman R, Strauss J, Lewine JD, Goldstein MG (1987) Does methylphenidate affect information processing? Findings from two studies on performance and p3b latency. Psychophysiology 24:361–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castner SA, Goldman-Rakic PS, Williams GV (2004) Animal models of working memory: insights for targeting cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 174:111–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coles MGH (1989) Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 26:251–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper JA, Sagar HJ, Tidswell P, Jordan N (1994) Slowed central processing in simple and go/no-go reaction time tasks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 117:517–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costall B, Fortune DH, Naylor RJ (1979) Neuropharmacological studies on the neuroleptic potential of domperidone (R33812). J Pharm Pharmacol 31:344–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crofts HS, Dalley JW, Collins P, van Denderen JC, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2001) Differential effects of 6-OHDA lesions of the frontal cortex and caudate nucleus on the ability to acquire an attentional set. Cereb Cortex 11:1015–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deco G, Rolls ET (2003) Attention and working memory: a dynamical model of neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 18:2374–2390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evarts EV, Teräväinen H, Calne DB (1981) Reaction time in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 104:167–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick P, Klorman R, Brumaghim JT, Keefover RW (1988) Effects of methylphenidate on stimulus evaluation and response processes: evidence from performance and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 25:292–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank MJ (2005) Dynamic dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia: a neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in medicated and non-medicated Parkinsonism. J Cogn Neurosci 17:51–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giray M, Ulrich R (1993) Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1278–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldman-Rakic PS, Bergson C, Mrzljak L, Williams GV (1997) Dopamine receptors and cognitive functions. In: KA Neve, RL Neve (eds) The dopamine receptors. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp 499–522Google Scholar
  21. Gratton G, Coles MHG, Sirevaag EJ, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1988) Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:331–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grübel-MathylU (1986) Effects of neuroleptics on aspects relevant to driving fitness. In: JF O’Hanlon, LL de Gier (eds) Drugs and driving. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 241–247Google Scholar
  23. Harden DG, Grace AA (1995) Activation of dopamine cell firing by repeated l-dopa administration to dopamine-depleted rats: its potential role in mediating the therapeutic response to l-dopa treatment. J Neurosci 15:6157–6166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Heffner TG, Zigmond MJ, Stricker EM (1977) Effects of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists on feeding in intact and 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 14:380–399Google Scholar
  25. Heilman KM, Bowers D, Watson RT, Greer M (1976) Reaction times in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 33:139–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jahanshahi M, Brown RGB, Marsden CD (1992) Simple and choice reaction time and the use of partial information for motor preparation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 115:539–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jasper HH (1958) Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 86:176–182Google Scholar
  28. Jenner P (1995) The rationale for the use of dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 45(Suppl 3):S86–S112Google Scholar
  29. Kahkonen S, Ahveninen J, Jaaskelainen IP, Kaakkola S, Näätänen R, Huttunen J, Pekkonen E (2001) Effects of haloperidol on selective attention: a combined whole-head MEG and high-resolution EEG study. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:498–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kutas M, Donchin E (1980) Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Res 202:95–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Low KA, Miller J, Vierck E (2002) Response slowing in Parkinson’s disease. A psychophysiological analysis of premotor and motor processes. Brain 125:1980–1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luthringer R, Rinaudo G, Toussaint M, Bailey P, Muller G, Muzet A Macher J (1999) Electroencephalographic characterization of brain dopaminergic stimulation by apomorphine in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychobiology 39:49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mandir AS, Vaughan C (2000) Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Int Rev Psychiatry 12:270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markham A, Benfield P (1997) Pergolide. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 7:328–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsden CD (1992) Dopamine and basal ganglia disorders in humans. Semin Neurosci 4:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller J (1988) Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychol 67:191–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller J, Patterson T, Ulrich R (1998) Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 35:99–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mink JW (1996) The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol 50:381–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Müller U, von Cramon Y, Pollmann S (1998) D1- versus D2-receptor modulation of visuospatial working memory in humans. J Neurosci 18:2720–2728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mueller-Gethmann H, Rinkenauer G, Stahl J, Ulrich R (2000) Preparation of response force and movement direction: onset effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 37:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Näätänen R (1971) Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time. Acta Psychol 35:316–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naylor H, Halliday R, Callaway E (1985) The effect of methylphenidate on information processing. Psychopharmacology 86:90–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Niemi P, Näätänen R (1981) Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychol Bull 89:133–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oades RD (1985) The role of noradrenaline in turning and dopamine in switching between signals in the CNS. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:261–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oertel WH, Quinn NP (1996) Parkinsonism. In: Brandt T, Caplan LR, Dichgans J, Diener HC, Kennard C (eds) Neurological disorders: course and treatment. Academic, San Diego, pp 715–772Google Scholar
  46. Olanow CW, Fahn S, Muenter M, Klawans H, Hurtig H, Stern M, Shoulson I, Kurlan R, Grimes JD, Jankovic J (1994) A multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pergolide as an adjunct to Sinemet in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 9:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Osman A, Moore CM (1993) The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1–21Google Scholar
  48. Osman A, Moore CM, Ulrich R (1995) Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychol 90:111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osman A, Moore CM, Ulrich R (2003) Temporal organization of covert motor processes during response selection and preparation. Biol Psychol 64:47–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Piercey MF, Hoffmann WE, Smith MW, Hyslop DK (1996) Inhibition of dopamine neuron firing by pramipexole, a dopamine D3 receptor-preferring agonist: comparison to other dopamine receptor agonists. Eur J Pharmacol 312:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Picton TW, Lins OG, Scherg M (1995) The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. In: Boller F, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–73Google Scholar
  52. Rafal RD, Inhoff AW, Friedman JH, Bernstein E (1987) Programming and execution of sequential movements in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:1267–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rammsayer T (1989) Is there a common dopaminergic basis of time perception and reaction time? Neuropsychobiology 21:37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rammsayer T (1997) Are there dissociable roles of the mesostriatal and mesolimbocortical dopamine systems on temporal information processing in humans? Neuropsychobiology 35:36–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rihet P, Possamaï C-A, Micallef-Roll J, Blin O, Hasbroucq T (2002) Dopamine and human information processing: a reaction-time analysis of the effect of levodopa in healthy subjects. Psychopharmacology 163:62–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robbins TW (2000) Chemical neuromodulation of frontal-executive functions in humans and other animals. Exp Brain Res 133:130–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saint-Cyr JA (2003) Frontal–striatal circuit functions: context, sequence, and consequence. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 9:103–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanders AF (1977) Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In: Dornic S (ed) Attention and performance VI. Erlbaum, New York, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  59. Sanders AF (1983) Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychol 53:61–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schück S, Bentué-Ferrer D, Kleinermans D, Reymann J-M, Polard E, Gandon J-M, Allain H (2002) Psychomotor and cognitive effects of piribedil, a dopamine agonist, in young healthy volunteers. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 16:57–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seamans JK, Yang CR (2003) The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex. Prog Neurobiol 74:1–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seiss E, Praamstra P (2004) The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 127:330–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Servan-Schreiber D, Prinz H, Cohen JD (1990) A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. Science 249:892–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Servan-Schreiber D, Carter CS, Bruno RM, Cohen JD (1998a) Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part I. A neural network model predicting dopamine effects on selective attention. Biol Psychiatry 43:713–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Servan-Schreiber D, Carter CS, Bruno RM, Cohen JD (1998b) Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part II. d-Amphetamine effects in human subjects performing a selective attention task. Biol Psychiatry 43:723–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stahl J, Gibbons H (2004) The application of jackknife-based onset detection of lateralized readiness potential in correlative approaches. Psychophysiology 41:845–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sternberg S (1969) The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donder’s method. Acta Psychol 30:276–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sternberg S (2001) Separate modifiability of mental modules and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychol 106:147–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stricker EM, Zigmond MJ (1986) Brain monoamines, homeostasis, and adaptive behavior. In: American Physiological Society (ed) Handbook of physiology, section 1. The nervous system, vol IV. Intrinsic regulatory systems of the brain. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 677–700Google Scholar
  70. Ulrich R, Mattes S, Miller J (1999) Donder’s assumption of pure insertion: an evaluation on the basis of response dynamics. Acta Psychol 102:43–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van der Molen MW, Bashore TR, Halliday R, Callaway E (1991) Chronopsychophysiology: mental chronometry augmented by psychophysiological time markers. In: Jennings JR, Coles MGH (eds) Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: central and automatic nervous system approaches. Wiley, Chichester, pp 9–178Google Scholar
  72. Volkow ND, Gur RC, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Moberg PJ, Ding Y-S, Hitzemann R, Smith G, Logan J (1998) Association between decline in brain dopamine activity with age and cognitive and motor impairment in healthy individuals. Am J Psychiatr 155:344–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Wascher E, Verleger R, Vieregge P, Jaskowski P, Koch S, Kompf D (1997) Responses to cued signals in Parkinson’s disease: distinguishing between disorders of cognition and of activation. Brain 120:1355–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Winterer G, Weinberger DR (2004) Genes, dopamine and cortical signal-to-noise ratio in schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci 27:683–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zigmond MJ, Heffner TG, Stricker EM (1980) The effect of altered dopaminergic activity on food intake in the rat: evidence for an optimal level of dopaminergic activity for behavior. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol 4:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georg-Elias-Müller-Institut für PsychologieUniversität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations