Complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli reveal multiple roles for nicotine in reinforcement
- 612 Downloads
Although considerable progress has been made, we do not yet fully understand the behavioral and neurobiological basis of nicotine reinforcement, and without this knowledge, treatment strategies aimed at reducing smoking remain deficient.
This review describes an original perspective on nicotine reinforcement, which arises from substantial evidence of complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli. We hypothesize that nicotine reinforcement derives from at least two sources: (1) primary reinforcement, an action that requires response-dependent drug administration and is capable of conveying secondary reinforcing effects on associated stimuli, and (2) the reinforcement-enhancing effect of nicotine, which directly enhances behavior maintained by salient nonnicotine stimuli and does not require a contingent relationship between drug administration and reinforced operant responding. Although novel for nicotine, this hypothesis has origins in an extensive literature on the reinforcing effects of psychostimulants. Empirical support for this hypothesis, based largely on animal models of reinforcement, will be presented.
Animal models of drug reinforcement have evolved to reflect our growing awareness of the multidimensional nature of drug dependence in humans. Investigating the interaction between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli within the context of the drug self-administration paradigm in rats has generated new insights into the paradox of how nicotine, an apparently weak primary reinforcer, can sustain the robust behavior observed in self-administration and in smoking. The hypothesis presented in this paper—that nicotine acts as both a primary reinforcer and an enhancer of other nonnicotine reinforcers—provides important direction for future investigations into the neurobiology of nicotine reinforcement and treatments for smoking cessation.
KeywordsNicotine Self-administration Nonpharmacological stimuli Pychostimulants Conditioned reinforcement Smoking Tobacco
The authors would like to acknowledge the excellent technical skills of Sheri Booth, Maysa Gharib, Laure Craven, Prema Chaudhary, Donna Pacelli, and Caroline Bouris. Preparation of this manuscript was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse research grants DA-10464 and DA-12655, and by a Howard Hughes Predoctoral Research Fellowship awarded to N. Chaudhri.
- Bugelski R (1938) Extinction with or without sub-goal reinforcement. J Comp Psychol 26:121Google Scholar
- Chaudhri N (2005) Complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli reveal a novel role for nicotine in reinforcement. http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-04222005-010521/
- Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Donny EC, Booth S, Gharib MA, Clements LA, Allen SS, Sved AF (2003) Enhancement of reinforced operant responding by nicotine and cocaine in rats: analysis of dose and drug-contingency. Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
- Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Donny EC, Palmatier MI, Xiu L, Sved AF (2005b) A dual role for nicotine in reinforcement. Experimental Biology, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
- Clark MS (1969) Self-administered nicotine solutions preferred to placebo by the rat. Br J Pharmacol 35:367PGoogle Scholar
- Dallery J, Houtsmuller EJ, Pickworth WB, Stitzer ML (2003) Effects of cigarette nicotine content and smoking pace on subsequent craving and smoking. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 165:172–180Google Scholar
- Deneau GA, Inoki R (1967) Nicotine self-administration in monkeys. Ann NY Acad Sci 142:277–279Google Scholar
- Donny EC, Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Evans-Martin FF, Booth S, Gharib MA, Clements LA, Sved AF (2003) Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 169:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism for psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamines and related compound. Proceedings of the Mario Negri Institute of Pharmacological Research. Raven Press, New York, pp 781–795Google Scholar
- Kenny PJ, Paterson NE, Boutrel B, Semenova S, Harrison AA, Gasparini F, Koob GF, Skoubis PD, Markou A (2003) Metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor antagonist MPEP decreased nicotine and cocaine self-administration but not nicotine and cocaine-induced facilitation of brain reward function in rats. Ann NY Acad Sci 1003:415–418 (November)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meisch RA, Lemaire GA (1993) Drug self-administration. In: van Haren F (ed) Methods in behavioral pharmacology. Elsevier, New York, pp 257–300Google Scholar
- Palmatier MI, Evans-Martin FF, Hoffman A, Caggiula AR, Chaudhri N, Donny EC, Liu X, Booth S, Gharib MA, Craven L, Sved AF (2005) Dissociating the primary reinforcing and reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine using a rat self-administration paradigm with concurrently available drug and environmental reinforcers. Psychopharmacology (in press)Google Scholar
- Parkinson JA, Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Bamford A, Fehnert B, Lachenal G, Rudarakanchana N, Halkerston KM, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2002) Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion impairs both acquisition and performance of appetitive Pavlovian approach behaviour: implications for mesoaccumbens dopamine function. Behav Brain Res 137:149–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1986) 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens, but not of the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 90:390–397Google Scholar
- USDHHS (1988) Nicotine addiction: a report of the surgeon general. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office on Smoking and Health, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar