Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 183, Issue 1, pp 81–91 | Cite as

Methylphenidate effects in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: electrodermal and ERP measures during a continuous performance task

  • Carlie A. Lawrence
  • Robert J. BarryEmail author
  • Adam R. Clarke
  • Stuart J. Johnstone
  • Rory McCarthy
  • Mark Selikowitz
  • Samantha J. Broyd
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Previous research investigating the effects of stimulants, such as methylphenidate (MPH), on children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) has rarely included autonomic measures of arousal.

Objective

Our aim was to clarify the effects of MPH on central and autonomic measures in AD/HD children during a continuous performance task (CPT) using a naturalistic open-label study.

Method

Thirty-six boys (18 AD/HD and 18 control) participated in a CPT over two trial periods, allowing a more valid estimate of the effects of medication, rather than assuming that retesting per se has no substantial impact. MPH was administered to the AD/HD group 1 h prior to the second trial. Errors and reaction time (RT) were recorded as measures of performance, electrodermal activity as an autonomic nervous system measure and event-related potentials (ERPs) as an index of central nervous system activity.

Results

AD/HD children made more errors than controls in the first session, but no group differences were found after medication. No significant differences were observed for RT. Skin conductance level was found to be lower in AD/HD children than controls, but this difference was also ameliorated after medication. Conversely, mean skin conductance response to target stimuli was found not to differ between groups during the initial test phase but became significantly different in phase 2. ERP data showed topographic differences between groups in N1, P2, N2 and P3 at the initial test phase, which were reduced at the second test.

Conclusion

Stimulant medication ameliorated some of the dysfunctions in AD/HD children, which are reflected in behavioural and ERP measures. These results, in combination with general differences in electrodermal activity, support a hypoarousal model of AD/HD, which can explain the action of MPH in these children.

Keywords

AD/HD Stimulants Event-related potentials Skin conductance CPT Boys Children Hypoarousal 

References

  1. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C (eds) (2001) Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist and revised child behaviour profile. University of Vermont, Burlington, VTGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1994) DSM-IV Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry RJ (1990) Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in electrodermal research: a study in the context of the OR. Psychophysiology 27:94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry RJ, O'Gorman JG (1989) Methods and mechanisms in electrodermal studies of omission responding. Biol Psychol 28:271–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry RJ, Sokolov EN (1993) Habituation of phasic and tonic components of the orienting reflex. Int J Psychophysiol 15:39–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry RJ, Johnstone S, Clarke AR (2003) A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. Event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 114:184–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry RJ, Clarke AR, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Rushby JA, Ploskova E (2004) EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level. Clin Neurophysiol 115:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke A, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Croft RJ (2002) EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate in boys with the inattentive type of attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1191–1198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen NJ, Douglas VI (1972) Characteristics of the orienting response in hyperactive and normal children. Psychophysiology 9:238–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen NJ, Douglas VI, Morgenstern G (1971) The effect of methylphenidate on attentive behaviour and autonomic activity in hyperactive children. Psychopharmacologica 22:282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank Y, Seiden JA, Napolitano B (1994) Event-related potentials to an “oddball” auditory paradigm in children with learning disabilities with or without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Electroencephalogr 25:136–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon M (1986) How is a computerised attention test used in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder? J Child Contemp Soc 19:53–64Google Scholar
  13. Graetz BW, Sawyer MG, Hazell PL, Arney F, Baghurst P (2001) Validity of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes in a nationally representative sample of Australian children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 40:1410–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna GL, Ornitz EM, Hariharan M (1996) Urinary epinephrine excretion during intelligence testing in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal boys. Biol Psychiatry 40:553–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Holcomb PJ, Ackerman PT, Dykman R (1985) Cognitive event-related brain potentials in children with attention and reading deficits. Psychophysiology 22:656–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holcomb PJ, Ackerman PT, Dykman R (1986) Auditory event-related potentials in attention and reading disabled boys. Int J Psychophysiol 3:263–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Humphreys DG, Kramer AF (1994) Toward a psychophysiological assessment of dynamic changes in mental workload. Hum Factors 36:3–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Anderson JW (2001) Topographic distribution and developmental timecourse of auditory event-related potentials in two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 42:73–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonkman LM, Kemner C, Verbaten MN, Van Engeland H, Kenemans JL, Camfferman G et al (1999) Perceptual and response interference in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and the effects of methylphenidate. Psychophysiology 36:419–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonkman LM, Kemner C, Verbaten MN, Van Engeland H, Camfferman G, Buitelaar JK et al (2000) Attentional capacity, a probe ERP study: differences between children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal control children and effects of methylphenidate. Psychophysiology 37:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karayanidis F, Robaey P, Bourassa M, De Koning D, Geoffroy G, Pelletier G (2000) ERP differences in visual attention processing between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys in the absence of performance differences. Psychophysiology 37:319–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klorman R (1991) Cognitive event-related potentials in attention deficit disorder. J Learn Disabil 24:130–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klorman R, Salzman LF, Pass HL, Borgstedt AD, Dainer KB (1979) Effects of methylphenidate on hyperactive children's evoked response during passive and active attention. Psychophysiology 16:23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klorman R, Salzman LF, Borgstedt AD, Dainer KB (1981) Normalising effects of methylphenidate on hyperactive children's vigilance performance and evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 18:665–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klorman R, Salzman LF, Bauer LO, Coons HW, Borgstedt AD, Halpern WI (1983) Effects of two doses of methylphenidate on cross-situational and borderline hyperactive children's evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 56:169–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klorman R, Brumaghim JF, Salzman LF, Strauss J, Borgstedt AD, McBride MC, Loeb S (1990) Effects of methylphenidate on processing negativities in patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychophysiology 27:328–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kok A (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38(3):557–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McCracken JT, Hinshaw SP, Henker B, Whalen CK, Zupran B (1990) Urinary catecholamine differences in ADHD versus normal children and effects of methylphenidate. Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael RL, Klorman R, Salzman LF, Borgstedt AD, Dainer KB (1981) Normalising effects of methylphenidate on hyperactive children's vigilance performance and evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 18:665–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neale MD (1999) Neale analysis of reading ability manual, 3rd edn. Australian Council for Educational Research Limited, Melbourne, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  31. Oades RD (2005) The roles of norepinephrine and serotonin in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In: Gozal D, Molfese DL (eds) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: from genes to patients. Humana Press Inc, Totowa, New Jersey, pp 97–130Google Scholar
  32. Oades RD, Dittmann-Balcar A, Schepke R, Eggers C, Zerbin B (1996) Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention deficit or tourette/tic symptoms. Biol Psychol 43:163–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Okazaki S, Maekawa H, Ozaki H, Futakami S (2002) Topographic changes of ERP during CPT-AX task at pre- and post-medication of methylphenidate in children with ADHD. Int Congr Ser 1232:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O'Toole K, Abramowitz A, Morris R, Dulcan M (1997) Effects of methylphenidate on attention and nonverbal learning in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 36:531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Overtoom CE, Verbaten MN, Kemner C, Kenemans JL, van Engeand H, Buitelaar JK, Camfferman G, Koelega HS (1998) Associations between event-related potentials and measures of attention and inhibition in the continuous performance task in children with ADHD and normal controls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 37:977–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pribram KH, McGuiness D (1975) Arousal activation and effort in the control of attention. Psychol Rev 2:116–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pribram KH, McGuiness D (1992) Attention and para-attentional processing: event-related brain potentials as tests of a model. In: Friedman D, Bruder GE (eds) Psychophysiology and experimental psychopathology: a tribute to Samuel Sutton, vol. 658. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York Academy of the Sciences, New York, NY, pp 65–92Google Scholar
  38. Prichep LS, Sutton S, Hakerem G (1976) Evoked potentials in hyperkinetic and normal children under certainty and uncertainty: a placebo and methylphenidate study. Psychophysiology 13:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rapoport JL, Buchsbaum MS, Weingartner H, Zahn TP, Ludlow C, Mikkelsen EJ (1980) Dextroamphetamine: its cognitive and behavioural effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:933–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Riccio CA, Reynolds CR, Lowe PA (eds) (2001) Clinical applications of continuous performance tests: measuring attention and impulsive responding in children and adults. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Satterfield JH, Cantwell DP (1974) CNS function and response to methylphenidate in hyperactive children. Psychopharmacol Bull 10:36–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Satterfield JH, Dawson ME (1971) Electrodermal correlates of hyperactivity in children. Psychophysiology 8:191–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Satterfield JH, Satterfield BT, Cantwell DP (1974) Pathophysiology of the hyperactive child syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 31:839–844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Satterfield JH, Schell AM, Nicholas TW, Satterfield BT, Freese TH (1990) Ontogeny of selective attention effects on event-related potentials in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal boys. Biol Psychiatry 28:879–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Seifert J, Scheuerpflug P, Zillensen KE, Fallgatter A, Warnke A (2003) Electrophysiological investigation of the effectiveness of methylphenidate in children with and without AD/HD. J Neural Transm 110:821–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Semlitsch H-V, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O (1986) A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artefact, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23:695–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sergeant JA, Oosterlaan J, van der Meere J (1999) Information processing and energetic factors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In: Quay HC, Hogan AE (eds) Handbook of disruptive behaviour disorders. Kluver Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 75–104Google Scholar
  48. Shibigaki M, Yamanaka T (1990) Attention of hyperactive preschool children—electrodermal activity during auditory stimulation. Percept Mot Skills 70:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shibigaki M, Yamanaka T, Furuya T (1993) Attention state in electrodermal activity during auditory stimulation of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Percept Mot Skills 77:331–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Spring C, Greenberg L, Scott J, Hopwood J (1974) Electrodermal activity in hyperactive boys who are methylphenidate responders. Psychophysiology 11:436–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strandburg RJ, Marsh J, Brown W, Asarnow RF, Higa J, Harper R et al (1996) Continuous-processing-related event-related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 40:964–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sunohara GA, Malone MA, Rovet J, Humphries TD, Roberts W, Taylor MJ (1999) Effect of methylphenidate on attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): ERP evidence. Neuropsychopharmacology 21(2):218–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (eds) (1989) Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor MJ, Voros JG, Logan WJ, Malone MA (1993) Changes in event-related potentials with stimulant medication in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychol 36:139–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Teicher MH, Lowen SB, Polcari A, Foley M, McGreenery CE (2004) Novel strategy for the analysis of CPT data provides new insight into the effects of methylphenidate on attentional states in children with ADHD. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 14:219–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Winsberg BG, Javitt DC, Silipo GS (1997) Electrophysiological indices of information processing in methylphenidate responders. Biol Psychiatry 42:434–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zahn TP, Abate F, Little B, Wender PH (1975) Minimal brain dysfunction, stimulant drugs, and autonomic nervous system activity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32:381–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zillesen KE, Scheuerpflug P, Fallgatter AJ, Strik WK, Warnke A (2001) Changes of the brain electrical fields during the continuous performance test in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder—boys depending on methylphenidate medication. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1166–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlie A. Lawrence
    • 1
  • Robert J. Barry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adam R. Clarke
    • 1
  • Stuart J. Johnstone
    • 1
  • Rory McCarthy
    • 2
  • Mark Selikowitz
    • 2
  • Samantha J. Broyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Brain & Behaviour Research InstituteUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Sydney Developmental ClinicSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations