The differential effects of ecstasy/polydrug use on executive components: shifting, inhibition, updating and access to semantic memory
- 481 Downloads
Recent theoretical models suggest that the central executive may not be a unified structure. The present study explored the nature of central executive deficits in ecstasy users.
In study 1, 27 ecstasy users and 34 non-users were assessed using tasks to tap memory updating (computation span; letter updating) and access to long-term memory (a semantic fluency test and the Chicago Word Fluency Test). In study 2, 51 ecstasy users and 42 non-users completed tasks that assess mental set switching (number/letter and plus/minus) and inhibition (random letter generation).
MANOVA revealed that ecstasy users performed worse on both tasks used to assess memory updating and on tasks to assess access to long-term memory (C- and S-letter fluency). However, notwithstanding the significant ecstasy group-related effects, indices of cocaine and cannabis use were also significantly correlated with most of the executive measures. Unexpectedly, in study 2, ecstasy users performed significantly better on the inhibition task, producing more letters than non-users. No group differences were observed on the switching tasks. Correlations between indices of ecstasy use and number of letters produced were significant.
The present study provides further support for ecstasy/polydrug-related deficits in memory updating and in access to long-term memory. The surplus evident on the inhibition task should be treated with some caution, as this was limited to a single measure and has not been supported by our previous work.
KeywordsEcstasy MDMA Cannabis Cocaine Memory updating Switching Inhibition Executive function
- Cole J, Sumnall H, Grob C (2002b) Sorted: ecstasy facts and fiction. Psychologist 15(9):464–467Google Scholar
- Fisk JE, Sharp C (2004) Age-related impairment in executive functioning: updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 26Google Scholar
- Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (1994) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (1985) Fundamentals of human neuropsychology, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McDowell DM, Kleber HD (1994) MDMA: its history and pharmacology. Psychiatr Ann 24:127–130Google Scholar
- Montgomery C, Fisk JE, Newcombe R (2004) Further evidence for deficits in the updating executive component process of working memory in users of MDMA (Ecstasy). Proc Br Psychol Soc 12:70Google Scholar
- Montgomery C, Fisk JE, Newcombe R, Wareing M, Murphy PN (2005) Syllogistic reasoning performance in MDMA (ecstasy) users. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 13Google Scholar
- Montgomery C, Fisk JE, Newcombe R (in press) The nature of ecstasy-group related differences in associative learning. PsychopharmacologyGoogle Scholar
- Morris N, Jones DM (1990) Memory updating in working memory: the role of the central executive. Br J Psychol 81:111–121Google Scholar
- Moulden DJA, Picton TW, Meiran N, Stuss DT, Riera JJ, Valdes-Sosa P (1998) Event-related potentials when switching attention between task-sets. Brain Cogn 37:186–190Google Scholar
- Nelson HE (1982) National Adult Reading Test (NART) test manual. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, BerkshireGoogle Scholar
- Ng Cheong Ton JM, Gardner EL (1986) Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on dopamine release in the brain: intracranial microdialysis experiments. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13:135Google Scholar
- Posner MI, Raichle ME (1994) Images of mind. Scientific American, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH (1998) Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford Psychologists Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Reneman L, Booij J, Lavalaye J, de Bruin K, Reitsma JB, Gunning BW, den Heeten GJ, van der Brink W (2002) Use of amphetamine by recreational users of ecstasy (MDMA) is associated with reduced striatal dopamine transporter densities: a [123I]beta-CIT SPECT study—preliminary report. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 159:335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner JJD, Godolphin M, Parrot AC (1999) Cognitive performance profiles of current and former “ecstasy” (MDMA) users. J Psychopharmacol 13:A24Google Scholar
- Verdejo-Garcia AJ, Lopez-Torrecillas F, de Arcos AF, Perez-Garcia M (2005) Differential effects of MDMA, cocaine, and cannabis use severity on distinctive components of the executive functions in polysubstance abusers: a multiple regression analysis. Addict Behav 30:89–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar