Escalated aggression as a reward: corticosterone and GABAA receptor positive modulators in mice
- First Online:
- 393 Downloads
Individuals seek out the opportunity to fight, but the mechanisms behind this positively reinforcing effect of aggression have yet to be understood.
The aims of this study were to (1) describe behavioral and corticosterone elevations that occur in aggressive mice conditioned to respond for the opportunity to fight another mouse, (2) determine if corticosterone elevations are necessary for operant responding and escalated aggression, and (3) determine if corticosterone elevations alter the aggression-heightening effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor positive modulators.
Methods and results
Aggressive male CFW mice were conditioned to respond under the control of a fixed-interval 10-min (FI10) schedule that reinforced their operant behavior by the presentation of an intruder mouse into their home cage. After the FI10, aggressive behavior was ca. 75% higher than the species-typical levels of fighting and plasma corticosterone was more than twice as high after briefly fighting and/or responding on the FI10 schedule. Inhibition of corticosterone synthesis by metyrapone (30–100 mg/kg) reduced both conditioned responding as well as the aggressive behavior after the FI. Although the benzodiazepine midazolam (0.3–3 mg/kg) heightened species-typical aggressive behavior, it did not increase the high level of aggression engendered by the FI schedule. However, midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone (17 mg/kg) both heightened aggression when given after corticosterone synthesis inhibition by metyrapone (56 mg/kg).
These data suggest that corticosterone elevations are required for responding that is motivated by aggressive behavior and for escalated aggression that follows this responding. Corticosterone elevations also appear to inhibit the aggression heightening effect of GABAA receptor positive modulators.
KeywordsBenzodiazepines Neurosteroids Alcohol HPA activity Reinforcement schedule Anxiety Intruder
- Cherek DR, Heistad GT (1971) Fixed-interval induced aggression. Psychon Sci 25:7–8Google Scholar
- Deuschle M, Lecei O, Stalla GK, Landgraf R, Hamann B, Lederbogen F, Uhr M, Luppa P, Maras A, Colla M, Heuser I (2003) Steroid synthesis inhibition with ketoconazole and its effect upon the regulation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal system in healthy humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:379–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dollard J, Doob L, Miller N, Mowrer O, Sears R (1939) Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Falk JL (1977) The origin and functions of adjunctive behavior. Anim Learn Behav 5:325–335Google Scholar
- Ginsburg B, Allee WC (1942) Some effects of conditioning on social dominance and subordination in inbred strains of mice. Physiol Zool 15:485–506Google Scholar
- Gourley SL, DeBold JF, Yin W, Cook J, Miczek KA (2005) Benzodiazepines and heightened aggressive behavior in rats: reduction by GABAA/alpha1 receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology (in press)Google Scholar
- Grant EC, Mackintosh JH (1963) A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. Behaviour 21:246–295Google Scholar
- Krsiak M (1975) Tail rattling in aggressive mice as a measure of tranquilizing activity of drugs. Act Nerv Super 17:225–226Google Scholar
- Lagerspetz K (1964) Studies on the aggressive behaviour of mice. Ann Acad Sci Fenn 131:1–131Google Scholar
- Legrand R (1970) Successful aggression as the reinforcer for runway behavior of mice. Psychon Sci 20:303–305Google Scholar
- Scott JP (1958) Aggression. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Tellegen A, Horn JM, Legrand RG (1969) Opportunity for aggression as a reinforcer in mice. Psychon Sci 14:104–105Google Scholar
- Thompson T (1969) Aggressive behaviour of Siamese fighting fish. In: Garattini S, Sigg EB (eds) Aggressive behaviour. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 15–31Google Scholar
- Van Hemel PE, Myer JS (1970) Satiation of mouse killing by rats in an operant situation. Psychon Sci 21:129–130Google Scholar