Reasoning deficits in ecstasy (MDMA) polydrug users
- 128 Downloads
Previous research has shown that ecstasy users are impaired in thinking and reasoning. The present study sought to explore the possibility that syllogistic reasoning errors in ecstasy users were due to an inability to construct a model of the premises due to working memory limitations.
Twenty-nine ecstasy users and 25 nonecstasy user controls completed abstract syllogistic reasoning problems varying in difficulty. Pairs of premises were provided, and participants were required to generate conclusions that followed necessarily from them.
On the easier problems, both groups performed at well above chance although nonusers achieved significantly more correct responses. Consistent with existing research, on the more difficult problems, errors by nonusers were characterised by incorrect conclusions suggesting that while nonusers have the working memory capacity to construct a single model of the premises, this is not an exhaustive representation and usually results in an erroneous conclusion. On the other hand, for all problem types, ecstasy users, rather than produce incorrect responses, were more likely to fail to generate a conclusion.
The present results are consistent with the possibility that ecstasy users with their reduced working memory capacity may experience difficulty in constructing even a single model of the premises. While this might be attributable to the effects of 3,4-methlylenedioxymethamphetamine neurotoxicity, many of the ecstasy users in the present study were polydrug users. Thus, the possibility that other drugs including cannabis and cocaine might contribute to the present results cannot be excluded.
KeywordsCocaine Incorrect Response Ecstasy Work Memory Capacity Stereotype Threat
- Cole J, Sumnall H, Grob C (2002) Sorted: ecstasy facts and fiction. Psychologist 15:464–467Google Scholar
- Fisk JE, Sharp C (2002) Syllogistic reasoning and cognitive ageing. Q J Exp Psychol 55A:1273–1293Google Scholar
- Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Fischermann T, Rezk M, Thimm B, Hensen G, Daumann J (in press) Memory performance in polyvalent MDMA (ecstasy) users who continue or discontinue MDMA use. Drug Alcohol DependGoogle Scholar
- Handley SJ, Dennis I, Evans JSBT, Capon A (2000) Individual differences and the search for counterexamples in syllogistic reasoning. In: Schaeken W, De Vooght G, Vandierendonck A, d'Ydewalle G (eds) Deductive reasoning and strategies. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
- Howell DC (1997) Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edn. Duxbury, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
- Inhelder B, Piaget J (1958) The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Montgomery C, Fisk JE, Newcombe R, Murphy PN (2005) The differential effects of MDMA (“ecstasy”) on executive components: shifting, inhibition, updating and access to semantic memory. (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
- Montgomery C, Fisk JE, Newcombe R, Wareing M, Murphy P (in press) Syllogistic reasoning performance in MDMA (Ecstasy) users. Exp Clin PsychopharmacolGoogle Scholar
- Newstead SE, Handley SJ, Buck E (1999) Falsifying mental models: testing the predictions of theories of syllogistic reasoning. Mem Cogn 27:344–354Google Scholar
- Newstead SE, Thompson VA, Handley SJ (2002) Generating alternatives: a key component in human reasoning? Mem Cogn 30:129–137Google Scholar
- Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH (1998) Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Stanovich KE, West RF (1998) Who uses base rates and P(D|∼H)? An analysis of individual differences. Mem Cogn 26:161–179Google Scholar
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Wareing M (2005) Working memory and executive deficits among MDMA (‘ecstasy’) users. Unpublished Ph.D. thesisGoogle Scholar
- Wareing M, Fisk JE, Murphy P (2002) Little evidence for central executive impairment among light/moderate users of MDMA. Proc Br Psychol Soc 10:107Google Scholar