Effects of the mGluR2/3 agonist LY354740 on computerized tasks of attention and working memory in marmoset monkeys
- 264 Downloads
LY354740 is a recently developed metabotropic glutamatergic receptor 2 and 3 (mGluR2/3) agonist. A high density of mGluR2 has been reported in terminal fields of the perforant path in rodents and humans, suggesting its involvement in cognitive functions mediated by the temporal lobe, including memory. A small number of in vivo studies in rodents have assessed the effects of LY354740 on memory tasks, reporting the induction of impaired memory for spatial orientation in a water maze task and for delayed match and non-match to position in an operant version of these tasks.
In the present primate study, we used radioautography to describe the distribution and intensity of 3H-LY354740 binding in the hippocampal formation of the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) relative to the rat. In the major, in vivo part of the study, the effects of systemic LY354740 on computerized tasks of attention and memory were investigated.
Adult common marmosets were trained to perform a five-choice serial reaction time (5-CSRT) task and a concurrent delayed match-to-position (CDMP) task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Automated test Battery (CANTAB). Filter tests of LY354740 effects on motor dexterity and motivation for reward revealed high inter-individual variation in sensitivity; therefore, on the 5-CSRT, subjects were tested at a dose range of 3–10 mg/kg, and on the CDMP, subjects were tested at 1–3 or 3–10 mg/kg.
Radioautography revealed a relatively low level of 3H-LY354740 binding in the marmoset hippocampal formation compared to the rat. Despite low binding, LY354740 reduced sustained-attention accuracy in the 5-CSRT, and reduced accuracy in two stages of the CDMP.
The current study provides novel evidence for the importance of mGluR2/3 in the regulation of primate cognitive functioning.
KeywordsMetabotropic glutamatergic receptor LY354740 Primate Marmoset CANTAB Attention Working memory
We are extremely grateful to Silvana Ressegatti and Jeanne Michel for marmoset care, Guy Higgins for insightful discussions, and to Giancarlo Tomio for writing the PERL computer programmes for analysis of the results output generated by the CANTAB software. We are also extremely grateful to Dr. Huguenin, Jurg Messer, Jennifer Beck and Petra Paszkiewicz for technical support in neuroanatomical studies. Simona Spinelli was in receipt of a Studentship funded by F. Hoffmann La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, and additional support was provided by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
- Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9:361–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunnett SB (1993) Operant delayed matching and non-matching to position in rats. In: Sahgal A (ed) Behavioural Neuroscience: a practical approach, Vol. 1 (The practical approach series). IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 149–163Google Scholar
- Easton A, Parker K, Derrington AM, Parker A (2003) Behaviour of marmoset monkeys in a T-maze: comparison with rats and macaque monkeys on a spatial delayed non-match to sample task. Exp Brain Res 150:114–116Google Scholar
- Mutel V, Adam G, Chaboz S, Kemp JA, Klingelschmidt A, Messer J, Wichmann J, Woltering T, Richards JG (1998) Characterization of (2S,2′R,3′R)-2-(2′,3′-[3H]-dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine binding in rat brain. J Neurochem 71:2558–2564Google Scholar
- Ohishi H, Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S, Mizuno N (1993a) Distribution of the messenger RNA for a metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR2, in the central nervous system of the rat. Neuroscience 53:1009–1018Google Scholar
- Pilc A (2003) LY-354740 (Eli Lilly). IDrugs 6:66–71Google Scholar
- Robbins TW, Semple J, Kumar R, Truman MI, Shorter J, Ferraro A, Fox B, McKay G, Matthews K (1997) Effects of scopolamine on delayed-matching-to-sample and paired associates tests of visual memory and learning in human subjects: comparison with diazepam and implications for dementia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 134:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sahakian BJ, Coull JT (1993) Tetrahydroaminoacridine (THA) in Alzheimer’s disease: an assessment of attentional and mnemonic function using CANTAB. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 149:29–35Google Scholar
- Schaffhauser H, Richards JG, Cartmell J, Chaboz S, Kemp JA, Klingelschmidt A, Messer J, Stadler H, Woltering T, Mutel V (1998) In vitro binding characteristics of a new selective group II metabotropic glutamate receptor radioligand, [3H]LY354740, in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol 53:228–233Google Scholar
- Shigemoto R, Kinoshita A, Wada E, Nomura S, Ohishi H, Takada M, Flor PJ, Neki A, Abe T, Nakanishi S, Mizuno N (1997) Differential presynaptic localization of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 17:7503–7522Google Scholar
- Skelton RW, McNamara RK (1992) Bilateral knife cuts to the perforant path disrupt spatial learning in the Morris water maze. Hippocampus 2:73–80Google Scholar
- Spinelli S (2004) A neuropsychopharmacological study of attention and memory in the marmoset monkey. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Squire LR, Knowlton B (1995) Memory, hippocampus, and brain systems. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 825–837Google Scholar
- Tanabe Y, Nomura A, Masu M, Shigemoto R, Mizuno N, Nakanishi S (1993) Signal transduction, pharmacological properties, and expression patterns of two rat metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR3 and mGluR4. J Neurosci 13:1372–1378Google Scholar
- Taylor JR, Elsworth JD, Roth RH, Sladek JR Jr, Redmond DE Jr (1990) Cognitive and motor deficits in the acquisition of an object retrieval/detour task in MPTP-treated monkeys. Brain 113:617–637Google Scholar